Oh, right. Then off (1) which is the current profile, as a result of the recalc presumably.
I deliberately didn't include [1] because that was a result of a DLM reset, rather than DLM action.
So that will just keep happening?
From the pre ASSIA info I had, it should reverse the steps in the same way they were applied. It looks like DLM was doing this on BS's line.
I don't know what changes have been applied since the ASSIA case, but I suspect those changes may be related to capping which Openreach uses in favour of target SNRM for NGA DLM.
On the Huawei cabs & 3db, they appear in part to have reverted back to the more familiar
Target SNRM that is used on the adsl2+ 21CN (& 20CN) system only the steps are 1dB per step rather than 3dB per step. From scanning through the court case notes it would appear that most of the complaints that ASSIA had involved the NGA DLM. It was the NGA (FTTC) DLM that BT had to change.
Because I dont have any info on what they changed since ASSIA, I have been trying to observe what happens & when.
Based on my observations, for INP and G.INP they appear to be using the familiar 20CN/12CN penalty system ie
First offence takes one full day of ILQ green to clear
2nd offence takes 10 full days of ILQ green to clear
3rd offence takes 14 full days of ILQ green to clear
etcAs regards to capping, I haven't got a clue - that now seems 'stuck' until god knows when
The other thing I haven't been able to fathom out fully on the Huawei cabs, is once a line has been reset, how long it takes for G.INP to be reapplied. NS has also been trying to find a pattern. This is why I am particularly interested in BS's line because we know when he did the DLM reset, so I would be really interested in knowing when it re-applies G.INP to his line.
Back to your question and the TLDR; answer.
No I don't believe it would. It was currently doing the only 1 day thing.
I believe it would have kicked in to the familiar penalty offence system. Next time it happened it would have taken a longer period of stability before it tried to lower it again after the next offence.
However, because BS has done a full reset.. the next time it happens (and it probably will) it will be back to the 1st offence and it will go back down to 3dB fairly quickly once it kicks back into the cycle thing.
Actually the penalty system usually works quite well - does do on 20CN/21CN.
Perhaps BS should have left it a bit longer to sort itself out... but actually I'm glad he didn't, because it is giving me an opportunity to see what is actually happening for sure. It was only after I had a full DLM reset on my own line that I could clearly see that they were using the penalty system for INP
I suspect something else is happening with BS's line. It's the upstream I'm watching.
I've yet to decide whether he does have something causes issues on the upstream - why else would DLM be changing those params which are supposed to be independent of the downstream Target SNRM params?
atm I'm undecided if perhaps he has an emerging HR fault...
or probably more likely in view of the fact of the other complaints on the BT forums by other HH5A users after the f/w update, that they may have attempted to make the HH5A fully G.INP compatible. TP-link did it with the TD-W9980 which has the same chip. ejs has always maintained it should be possible on the ECI modems and apparently the hacked ECI's with custom f/w supposedly does. So it is a possibility that they may have... but not got something quite right and it is causing some weird instability issues. From what I saw on the BT forums some of the modems were doing a full power cycle - not just a resync.