Don't know about individual router stats and what they show, but when I get a classic BT circuit subject to REIN, I can view it via Rambo and yes, the INP count will show a figure. I've personally only seen the highest DS INP set to '4', and the US set to '2'.
Whether there are greater depths, I wouldn't know, but when it's already at the levels quoted, there's usually action already being taken by the ISP/OR engineers.
Hmm. A recent resync changed my FTTC stats from (DS/US) INP 3/0, Delay 8/0 to INP 8/0, Delay 16/0 (INPRein remained 0/0). Does that mean I can expect some action to be taken, even if I do not complain?
Presumably the fact that US is not affected means the interference must be somewhere near my end of the line?
Greybeard ...... I don't know mate. I would very much doubt it. I think you are perhaps reading my earlier post, and I may have given the impression the DLM will alert someone if the INP is raised ?? that's not what I meant.
I was trying to infer that
if DS and US INP levels are as high as they can go, then there's a chance there could be REIN in the area and others may too be affected. It was kind of aimed at ryant, after he mused over wether REIN is detected and flagged to us.
That's the problem with remote-faulting, graph-faulting, EU's diagnosis, .......... it's never as easy as that.
Our test systems, Brandenburg in particular, reports almost anything it sees as REIN, when the issue will be found to be a 2-3dB profile causing the problem, or star-wiring, or a HR, or ...... anything else !!
Our 'Diagnostic Centre of Excellence' were adamant that there was a fault on a E-side cable after the EU had had over 40 (i kid you not) engineering visits. They were using hLog or something, from where they were based in London, and no amount of protestations would budge them. A 'Computer says' mentality. The circuit in question had had about 4 E-side changes previously, the fault was the Exchange DSL equipment on the SNR US. Whenever the phone was rung the broadband dropped out, and this bespoke fault was traced to Fujitsu Mark 2 equipment being the culprit. The DCoE had to raise the US SNR manually and apply a 'cap' to resolve the issue. Only until a port was found on Fuji Mk3 equipment.
Don't get me wrong, graphical analysis has it's place, i use it all the time, especially when REIN faulting to get a wider picture of what's going on. But why your circuit has been imposed with an INP of 3, I wouldn't know. My statement was made under the assumption the MPF tests perfect, against all 'normal' interference. If your circuit was then to ramp up to high levels of INP, then there's a good chance REIN may be lurking ??