Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[NewtronStar]

Early this morning went onto G.Inp. Slight reduction in latency 10% increase in sync DS no change U/S as to be expected. ES DS gone to zero after daily average of circa 650.

All this bonus and still using SP06 firmware.

Long wait but initially seems worth it

Being on a long line the DS errored seconds is the enemy and G.INP does a great job to eliminate them almost by 99.6% 

[skyeci]

skyeci before you was g.inp you was interleaved, so a sync speed increase is no surprise, it will very likely also see an increase on the 8800nl, but by the same amount? you wont know until you try it.

Its very important to check for and specify here if its apple vs apple comparison, apple vs apple been fast path vs g.inp.

Managed to try the billion out tonight. It synced lower than the eci but latency was the same. Some difference in snrm values between the 2 modems.

Billion synced at 62 where as the eci synced at 66mb. Went back to the eci 40 mins later and it synced higher than the 8800nl, just shy of 66mb. Maybe the eci modems do sync higher....

So far for me the billion synced faster than eci pre g.inp but with high latency. Eci wins after g.inp for sync speed. Latency appears to be the same post g.inp at 11ms

[daveesh1]

My #CI not unlocked so I can only go of sync speed and IP profile. To me the eci sync about the same down as my billion but up was. 6.5 instead of around 7.9 with billion. So for me waited all this time for G.inp on ECI and apart from lot lower ES errors sync speed is slightly worse oh well better speed than some.

[skyeci]

My #CI not unlocked so I can only go of sync speed and IP profile. To me the eci sync about the same down as my billion but up was. 6.5 instead of around 7.9 with billion. So for me waited all this time for G.inp on ECI and apart from lot lower ES errors sync speed is slightly worse oh well better speed than some.

How far from cab - I am about 330m

[S.Stephenson]

skyeci before you was g.inp you was interleaved, so a sync speed increase is no surprise, it will very likely also see an increase on the 8800nl, but by the same amount? you wont know until you try it.

Its very important to check for and specify here if its apple vs apple comparison, apple vs apple been fast path vs g.inp.

Managed to try the billion out tonight. It synced lower than the eci but latency was the same. Some difference in snrm values between the 2 modems.

Billion synced at 62 where as the eci synced at 66mb. Went back to the eci 40 mins later and it synced higher than the 8800nl, just shy of 66mb. Maybe the eci modems do sync higher....

So far for me the billion synced faster than eci pre g.inp but with high latency. Eci wins after g.inp for sync speed. Latency appears to be the same post g.inp at 11ms

Well my line is basically the same length as yours 320-350m(14.2dB) and I sync at 62mbps on the HG612 and 65mbps on an ECI modem.

[Chrysalis]

skyeci before you was g.inp you was interleaved, so a sync speed increase is no surprise, it will very likely also see an increase on the 8800nl, but by the same amount? you wont know until you try it.

Its very important to check for and specify here if its apple vs apple comparison, apple vs apple been fast path vs g.inp.

But when the billion first got g.inp I lost sync speed both ways hence getting bt out.

yes but different pair, on this pair you was interleaved. hence the large jump.

[Chrysalis]

My #CI not unlocked so I can only go of sync speed and IP profile. To me the eci sync about the same down as my billion but up was. 6.5 instead of around 7.9 with billion. So for me waited all this time for G.inp on ECI and apart from lot lower ES errors sync speed is slightly worse oh well better speed than some.

shame as now us ECI users choose between max sync speed or having a proper chipset for monitoring.  Not just for monitoring either, I dont know of any ECI device other than the openreach one that can be used in bridge mode.

if chaos calmer is stable I guess I will be paying someone to put that on one of my ECI modems.

[skyeci]

I would accept a small drop in ds(was about 4mb)if the latency is as good as the eci as I am more bothered about latency for gaming. Going to do some more tests with the billion at some point to see if it can keep the better latency at the acceptance of a small drop in ds. Would like to keep the monitoring so it might be an option I can live with. More tests later in the week...

[daveesh1]

Around 450 - 500m from cab

[skyeci]

Around 450 - 500m from cab

How much did you lose on ds or us out of interest. Mine on 8800 was just under 4mb on ds only with g.inp and on the new pair. Cheers

[Chrysalis]

activations seem to have slowed to a cruel now. Quite possibly due to the bank holiday.

[gazaai]

I wonder how an unlocked ECU modem performs on an a huawei cabinet, I would like to know if it would perform better than a billion 8800nl.

[daveesh1]

Skyeci with the ECI I lost 1.5MB upstream and around 2 MB Downstream but don't know what attainable sync was. With the billion I get 7.5MB upstream and 40MB Downstream but I am one BT infinity 1. The attainable rate on the Billion is 46134 and 7999 which have reduced by 2MB and just over .5MB Upstream.

[markg33]

My HH5A lost sync/rebooted not long ago and it looks like I have G.INP enabled.

The Home Hub 5 reads now:

Data rate: 20000 / 79906
Maximum data rate: 32961 / 111252

*My data rate used to be 20000/79995 before the resync/reboot.*

On the BRAS checker it reports the following:

Downstream BRAS rate is: 77.35 Mbps
Upstream BRAS rate is: 20 Mbps

*My downstream BRAS used to be 77.44 Mbps.*

So it looks like all is well and follows the general ECI G.INP outcomes as of late.

Mark.

[daveesh1]

Just trying a Links dsl n66u and my Downstream has dropped to 33MB but upstream has increased to 9994 with attainable rates of 46MB down and 10590 UP. Shame it wont run on DSLstats so easy to monitor then