I'm trying to get my head around this, and not doing well.
We the people (represented by UKFI on behalf of our government) own a lot of shares in "bailed-out" banks.
The idea is that these shares will, in due course when those banks are "sorted out", be sold commercially to cover the costs "we" have incurred.
If a proportion are "sold" at a cut price to "us" (or a sub-set of "us") then "we" get less money back.
That money has to be found somewhere, so presumably more taxes or more cuts.
Robbing Peter to pay Paul?
Or has someone, somewhere re-invented the perpetual-motion money machine again?