My own biggest gripe, often mentioned, is what exactly is “full fibre”?
Most people think it means FTTP. Others claim that FTTB also qualifies (often, these people are providers of FTTB). I have searched long and hard to find an ITU or similar definition of “Full Fibre“, and failed to find one. Yet there it is, in everyday adverts (though admittedly, this one does clarify they mean FTTP).
Arguably, “full fibre” would mandate glass cables to replace ethernet, but when copper STP can support 1Gbps and more, would there be any point? Electrical signals in copper ethernet already travel at speeds comparable to “speed of light”.
“Full fibre”, seems to me, would also preclude WiFi as your tablets, phones and laptops would need to be connected via a physical glass cable rather than wireless, which might well take the wind from the sails of those who worship the phrase.
I would love to be proven wrong about all that, by a reference to an authoritative definition of “Full Fibre”.