No, I don't own their hardware, but if I were well enough I would love to do so. I have a commercial SkyScan unit, which has extremely badly designed software - dangerously so - because if you do not configure it correctly, or if you ever get a power cut, the defaults are dangerous in that it just doesn't warn you. This caused £900 of damage when the device was asleep on the job. But now I have it by my bed so I can see it and check that it is running, not asleep and I also have the Blitzortunglive app running on two iPads, and that warns me if their detectors pick up an event inside a circle that I can choose on a map. They do have sensors in Scotland but none near me. Even so, the range of these things is very very impressive as I have just proved to myself, so I think that I can probably trust their data feed. My own unit picked up spikes that were an enormous distance away, >100 mi because it was set to max range, which was probably a bad idea. Blitzortunglive then gave me the position of the strike straight away, otherwise I would not have had any idea what it was or even if it was some kind of red herring. Electrical disturbances in the house can trigger my lightning unit, for example, light switches. Turning the sensitivity down to something reasonable like 50 mi might be an idea. The thing is, I am thinking about the nightmare case where a storm is approaching and the only strike that happens is one at extreme range, then nothing until it is right upon us, so in that case I need to be woken up to look at the map, never mind the fact that the strike is too far away to be a problem in itself.
It would be a nice software feature if the Blitzortunglive app could track the storms, differentiate their positions and then see if the velocity vectors brought them into your chosen circle, giving a time to intercept plus radius of approach. I would write it myself. I would need to work out how to get hold of the live data.