Kitz ADSL Broadband Information
adsl spacer  
Support this site
Home Broadband ISPs Tech Routers Wiki Forum
 
     
   Compare ISP   Rate your ISP
   Glossary   Glossary
 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Author Topic: G.INP - Upstream  (Read 2341 times)

mlmclaren

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
G.INP - Upstream
« on: April 18, 2016, 11:17:07 PM »
Where's upstream G.INP gone, I could really do with it right now :(
Logged

loonylion

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 723
Re: G.INP - Upstream
« Reply #1 on: April 19, 2016, 07:59:30 PM »
I could too, but mine has been off ever since G.INP MK1 became MK2.
Logged

underzone

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 442
Re: G.INP - Upstream
« Reply #2 on: April 19, 2016, 08:07:13 PM »
He got it back  ;)

Logged

Dray

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2361
Re: G.INP - Upstream
« Reply #3 on: April 19, 2016, 08:11:57 PM »
The noise must be crazy bad to get upstream ginp on  :crazy:
Logged

Dray

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2361
Re: G.INP - Upstream
« Reply #4 on: April 19, 2016, 08:23:34 PM »
There is an interesting absence of the familiar V shape on the Bits/Tone graph which I thought was the ADSL psd mask  ???
Logged

burakkucat

  • Respected
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 38300
  • Over the Rainbow Bridge
    • The ELRepo Project
Re: G.INP - Upstream
« Reply #5 on: April 19, 2016, 09:21:35 PM »
Quote from: Dray on April 19, 2016, 08:23:34 PM
There is an interesting absence of the familiar V shape on the Bits/Tone graph which I thought was the ADSL psd mask  ???

I can think of one case were such an absence could be observed in the bits per tone graph. That is the case where PCP and DSLAM cabinets are installed directly outside of an exchange building, provided as the solution for EO lines.
Logged
:cat:  100% Linux and, previously, Unix. Co-founder of the ELRepo Project.

Please consider making a donation to support the running of this site.

mlmclaren

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
Re: G.INP - Upstream
« Reply #6 on: April 20, 2016, 12:53:53 AM »
Oh yeah sorry guys, forgot to update this...

Yes, funny enough a few hours after posting this (4am) G.INP was activated on Upstream and it has done exactly what I'd hoped it would.

The line is a lot more stable now as you can see, no more errored seconds unlike the the days following... I'm not sure but I would say that even the downstream (which already had G.INP) seems to have improved a bit more with the additions of the error correction on the downstream.
Logged

mlmclaren

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
Re: G.INP - Upstream
« Reply #7 on: April 21, 2016, 11:10:28 AM »
What the hell is the deal with DLM.... I'm at the end of mytether with this stupid {censored} connection now  :no:

G.INP has been disabled on my connection early hours this morning, now my errored seconds are back....
Logged

licquorice

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 977
Re: G.INP - Upstream
« Reply #8 on: April 21, 2016, 11:55:09 AM »
Quote from: mlmclaren on April 21, 2016, 11:10:28 AM
What the hell is the deal with DLM.... I'm at the end of mytether with this stupid {censored} connection now  :no:


As Churchill said 'It is a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma'
Logged
 

anything