Here you go
It looks from MDWS there are several others that have also had this cack handed attempt of a fix applied where it wasn't needed i use a huawei , So that may blow the theory about the DSLAM being able see what brand of chip the modem is using and apply the profile accordingly, they would appear to have blundered yet again and rolled it out to all regardless wrong again BTOR As my us does generate errors when fast path my concern is ending up with the borked ECI profile interleave on the us when G.inp on both did it's job as it was supposed to do,
Maybe people power will get BT to listen to what it's customers what, a petition so the customer gets control via isp of how their connection is set up, because it's clear bt don't have any clue "opt out of DLM"
I haven't rebooted the modem to clear all the errors from before the change, and as a result of the change
Also due to the dlm action and modem re syncing very quickly it's difficult to say if my BTW IP profile has changed, as it still shows 77.35 but it would if it hadn't been updated, as i have encountered before,following DLM action, i have had to power off the modem wait a short time and power it back on again ,to get the BTW ip profile to update,
I noticed that the Zen radius servers detected the re sync, where as in the past plusnets often did not as you would be on the same Gateway, and router had nothing in its log to say it lost pppoe session due to not getting a response for 6 seconds