Kitz ADSL Broadband Information
adsl spacer  
Support this site
Home Broadband ISPs Tech Routers Wiki Forum
 
     
   Compare ISP   Rate your ISP
   Glossary   Glossary
 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 ... 22

Author Topic: FTTC woes  (Read 64660 times)

GigabitEthernet

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2243
Re: FTTC woes
« Reply #165 on: July 17, 2015, 07:36:18 PM »

How do they connect the JDSU to the line when they're tracing a fault a long a line? I've always wondered this.
Logged

GigabitEthernet

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2243
Re: FTTC woes
« Reply #166 on: July 17, 2015, 07:49:28 PM »

I want this line! :(

Logged

NewtronStar

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4898
Re: FTTC woes
« Reply #167 on: July 17, 2015, 07:54:11 PM »

How do they connect the JDSU to the line when they're tracing a fault a long a line? I've always wondered this.

Via the Master Socket thats all it's supposed to connect to  :-\
Logged

GigabitEthernet

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2243
Re: FTTC woes
« Reply #168 on: July 17, 2015, 07:54:44 PM »

Via the Master Socket thats all it's supposed to connect to  :-\

No I meant if they're out repairing a fault can they not connect equipment to the line at a joint or something?
Logged

NewtronStar

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4898
Re: FTTC woes
« Reply #169 on: July 17, 2015, 08:00:43 PM »

Via the Master Socket thats all it's supposed to connect to  :-\

No I meant if they're out repairing a fault can they not connect equipment to the line at a joint or something?

As far as i can see the JDSU will show a fault on the line when connected to your master socket it should show where on the circuit be it 0.5 meters or 1km away and further.
Logged

GigabitEthernet

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2243
Re: FTTC woes
« Reply #170 on: July 17, 2015, 08:03:11 PM »

And how does it do that? :)
Logged

NewtronStar

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4898
Re: FTTC woes
« Reply #171 on: July 17, 2015, 08:12:43 PM »

And how does it do that? :)

Reflected Pulse you need to talk to Burakkucat for more information  :)
Logged

GigabitEthernet

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2243
Re: FTTC woes
« Reply #172 on: July 17, 2015, 10:52:45 PM »

I know FECs aren't important in terms of DLM but I'm wondering if the amount on my line might be yet another indication of an underlying issue?

Is 348514 FECs in nearly 9 hours excessive? In that time we've also had 76 CRCs and 28 ES - this is on the downstream.

The upstream reports 76221 FECs in the same time period.
Logged

les-70

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1254
Re: FTTC woes
« Reply #173 on: July 18, 2015, 04:09:59 PM »

  I remain of the view that it is hard to be sure whether your line has a mild fault that Openreach has not picked up or whether you just have a rather noisy environment influencing the line.  Could you post the bit loading per tone when the SNRM is a max - typically in the day and also when it is a minimum say ~21:00 in the evening.  I am wondering whether it is possible to spot any signature in the change in bits per tone.

 It would also be good to see what happens if you use the RF3 and what difference, if any, it makes.   From my own experience i suspect that you won't be able to better the HG612 for error rates.   Other modems may give a better sync but they can also give higher error rates.
Logged

GigabitEthernet

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2243
Re: FTTC woes
« Reply #174 on: July 18, 2015, 04:23:42 PM »

The thing is that we're in a very quiet semi-rural area.

There is nothing between us and the cabinet that immediately pops out as being a source of interference. There is a pub but since the interference appears to be there all the time, not just when the pub is open, would seem to indicate that that isn't the cause.

The fact that previous fault tests have picked up a seemingly intermittent fault that magically goes away would seem to indicate an issue of some kind. The telephone line has been crackly in the past (I didn't actually know about this but other family members have indicated this) so this would seem to indicate some external issue.

I remain puzzled by the missing upstream tones because as has been said by others, the graph is looking quite healthy when suddenly all the tones just vanish.
Logged

tbailey2

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1245
Re: FTTC woes
« Reply #175 on: July 18, 2015, 04:32:35 PM »

Could you post the bit loading per tone when the SNRM is a max - typically in the day and also when it is a minimum say ~21:00 in the evening.  I am wondering whether it is possible to spot any signature in the change in bits per tone.

Here you go .. anyone can do this if they want....
Logged
Tony
My Books!
Plusnet 80/20 - DSLstats - HG612/TG582n - ECI

GigabitEthernet

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2243
Re: FTTC woes
« Reply #176 on: July 18, 2015, 04:49:35 PM »

The strange thing about my line is that with only half (?) the tones for the upstream being available, the upstream is still syncing at almost 8Mb.

Looking at other lines with similar attenuations, some achieve lower upstream syncs with more tones available.

Can the modem dedicate more power to the tones that are available? I remember previously it was stated that the bitloading is better on the tones that are available.
Logged

les-70

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1254
Re: FTTC woes
« Reply #177 on: July 18, 2015, 05:46:04 PM »

  Tony's helpful addition has both educated me and answered my question - thanks Tony.   Looking at the bits per tone it looks like it is the higher frequency band that being hit most in the evening and with a dip towards the highest frequencies that are used.  That does make it look like RF noise but an indication of such noise can mean lots of noise about or a line which is prone to picking what ever noise there is.  Usually indicated by poor AC balance -- which the engineer ruled out.   

   As you say the absence of any bit loading at all in the higher frequency upstream band is odd given the preceding bit loading in the downstream band.

   Not much help I am afraid but the slow drifts in SNRM up and down do seem to be RF noise and not cross talk.   If and it is a big if, the noise is common mode, the RF3 should help but often the noise is not common mode.
Logged

GigabitEthernet

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2243
Re: FTTC woes
« Reply #178 on: July 18, 2015, 05:53:35 PM »

I still couldn't get the RF3 to work and I tried multiple cables :(

I'll see if I can get the engineer to fit one on Monday.
Logged

GigabitEthernet

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2243
Re: FTTC woes
« Reply #179 on: July 18, 2015, 05:58:53 PM »

Usually indicated by poor AC balance -- which the engineer ruled out.   

The particular test he ran passed yes but the issue I believe to be intermittent (TalkTalk did have one failed line test for instance, as did Plusnet a few years ago).

I'm just going to try my best to get the engineer to do a D-side change which he may or may not do ???
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 ... 22
 

anything