If a customer is no longer subject of their initial min term 12/ 18month then i see no issues with ISP 's placing modify orders ie switching to and from 80/20 to 40/10 and back again or a any combination, as long as the customer agrees to pay, where's the problem? ok some may loose out in doing this as prices increase over time, But if it achieves the goal of getting the evil DLM reset to the wide open state then many would be prepared to pay, for what should be a free option that isp's should be able to offer, IMO all customers should be given a choice to have DLM active or not( manual config),
Again as long as those who don't want DLM have knowledge of any potential issues that may arise should the line suffer large bursts of errors due to local interference ect, and accept this then where is the problem in doing that? Many LLU suppliers have managed without DLM ,
My line appears to sometimes suffer from some form of interference this causes a high error rate, but isn't service affecting, but DLM still applies interleave and then takes weeks before it reverts back to fast path, DLM for me is no more than a paid in the a** if bt turn it off that will be welcome news