I'm wondering if there is too much reporting. For instance, to report that this leaflet is in circulation as well as 'informing ' the public, it's informing the perpetrators too ..... they can then regroup and change their tactics. The same with the announcement that 16,000 police would be deployed in London, this should should of course have been done, but IMHO, not broadcast - it was obvious, well it was to me, that the gangs would simply co-ordinate their rampages elsewhere, where there was no increase in cover, and that's evidently what happened. We don't need to know what is happening every moment, or what steps are being taken .... we don't need to have the same images on the 24 hour news broadcasts, or the mentioning of these events every 15 minutes (and that's what is is on R5 Live at the moment). The same programme reported earlier that they had
just received an e-mail from a serving policeman saying that they couldn't cope. I heard that very same thing broadcast last night on the same station, different presenter; how do the BBC know this is a serving policeman for goodness sake ? (I doubt very much that it was) anyone could send an e-mail..... how irresponsible is that ! the thugs will be listening and watching to see how famous they all are now - broadcasting at its worse.
To top it all, the BBC Web site had a link to two young girls boasting about what they were doing, and laughing in the face of decency ..... another famous pair now !!!
The whole episode, which is dreadful, is being carried out by a minority of yobs, and yet the coverage is so OTT that it's starting to be offensive in itself.
I notice that the people who volunteered for the clean up process are not getting as much publicity .... but that's good news isn't it .... so it doesn't make the headlines.
I've switched off my radio !