Kitz ADSL Broadband Information
adsl spacer  
Support this site
Home Broadband ISPs Tech Routers Wiki Forum
 
     
   Compare ISP   Rate your ISP
   Glossary   Glossary
 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: [1] 2 3

Author Topic: PingTest.net  (Read 16524 times)

UncleUB

  • Helpful
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 29543
PingTest.net
« on: October 03, 2009, 08:04:42 AM »

Just seen this on the www.speedtest.net site

www.pingtest.net

Not sure what it all means,but this was my test result.

Logged

roseway

  • Administrator
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 43603
  • Penguins CAN fly
    • DSLstats
Re: PingTest.net
« Reply #1 on: October 03, 2009, 08:17:34 AM »

That looks excellent to me. Whatever server I try from that site, I get 100% packet loss recorded. ???

If you click on the 'Learn more' button you'll get an explanation of what it's all supposed to mean.
Logged
  Eric

tuftedduck

  • Senior Kitizen
  • ******
  • Posts: 29658
  • Router Luvvin Duck
Re: PingTest.net
« Reply #2 on: October 03, 2009, 08:39:38 AM »

It's telling me that I suffer from "100% packet loss"

 :cry2:

What does that mean please..? The "learn more" tab just says that anything over a 0% loss is a problem, but there is no further explanation.
Logged

GunJack

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 484
Re: PingTest.net
« Reply #3 on: October 03, 2009, 09:22:36 AM »

I tried this last night....ran back-to-back tests with the same serveers on speedtest then pingtest, all the speedtest ping results were higher than the pingtest results so used the feedback form to let them know.

With it being a Beta release, the more peeps who try it and provide feedback the more chance they/we've got of getting a very useful end product, in my humble opinion ;)
Logged
8)..........Gettin' There, Wherever There is..........8)

roseway

  • Administrator
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 43603
  • Penguins CAN fly
    • DSLstats
Re: PingTest.net
« Reply #4 on: October 03, 2009, 10:06:33 AM »

I think that the packet loss report must be a bug in the system, because 100% packet loss would presumably mean that there was no good data received at all. I've submitted a report to the site.

Logged
  Eric

djnield

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 24
Re: PingTest.net
« Reply #5 on: October 03, 2009, 10:09:37 AM »

I just tried and got the following

Logged

jeffbb

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2329
Re: PingTest.net
« Reply #6 on: October 03, 2009, 12:13:56 PM »

Hi

these are my results  seems to work ok  :) could be handy for gamers .


Regards Jeff
Logged
zen user

orainsear

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 635
Re: PingTest.net
« Reply #7 on: October 03, 2009, 12:22:17 PM »

I think that the packet loss report must be a bug in the system, because 100% packet loss would presumably mean that there was no good data received at all. I've submitted a report to the site.



You haven't got ICMP disabled?
Logged

geep

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 452
    • My ST546 Statistics
Re: PingTest.net
« Reply #8 on: October 03, 2009, 12:23:01 PM »


Cheers,
Peter
Logged

roseway

  • Administrator
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 43603
  • Penguins CAN fly
    • DSLstats
Re: PingTest.net
« Reply #9 on: October 03, 2009, 12:38:28 PM »

You haven't got ICMP disabled?

I'm embarrassed to admit that I did. But now that I've enabled it I still get 100% packet loss reported.
Logged
  Eric

waltergmw

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2776
Re: PingTest.net
« Reply #10 on: October 03, 2009, 01:12:30 PM »

It is definitely a feature of this beta software. I've tried two different Zen lines from THCN.
One reports 100% packet loss on two occasions. The other had one from three with 100 %.
My own Virgin cable line reports that it can't do the packet loss calculation.

Kind regards,
Walter
Logged

GunJack

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 484
Re: PingTest.net
« Reply #11 on: October 03, 2009, 03:35:00 PM »

Reading through the FAQ, this little gem popped out at me....very handy, I would think, if trying to resolve behind-the-exchange network faults maybe....

http://www.maxmind.com/app/locate_my_ip
Logged
8)..........Gettin' There, Wherever There is..........8)

tickmike

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 3641
  • Yes Another Penguin !. :)
Re: PingTest.net
« Reply #12 on: October 03, 2009, 11:20:36 PM »

Well I've tried this four times and it's crashed my browser each time it tries to load the page. >:D >:(
Logged
I have a set of 6 fixed IP's From  Eclipse  isp.BT ADSL2(G992.3) line>HG612 as a Modem, Bridge, WAN Not Bound to LAN1 or 2 + Also have FTTP (G.984) No One isp Fixed IP >Dual WAN pfSense (Hardware Firewall and routing).> Two WAN's, Ethernet LAN, DMZ LAN, Zyxel GS1100-24 Switch.

jid

  • Content Team
  • Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1945
Re: PingTest.net
« Reply #13 on: October 04, 2009, 12:17:26 PM »



I like this site... Good idea.

Seems a bit glitchy with Packet Loss though...
Logged
Kind Regards
Jamie

BT FTTP - 75meg | Sky Q |  Bridgend Weather

roseway

  • Administrator
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 43603
  • Penguins CAN fly
    • DSLstats
Re: PingTest.net
« Reply #14 on: October 05, 2009, 06:48:27 AM »

I've had a reply to my bug report:

----------------------------
It is possible this is due to your system not having Java installed. Please confirm you have the required install:

http://www.pingtest.net/help.php#q6

Alternatively, if you have a hardware or software firewall blocking UDP traffic over port 5060, this would also cause the test to fail. We will be making a few changes that result in showing packetloss as N/A in instances where this occurs.
---------------------------------------

I do have Java installed of course, but all incoming ports are blocked by the router, so that's probably the explanation. I've temporarily opened port 5060 for UDP traffic to test it, but at present I can't access the PingTest site.

It does make me think that those of you who didn't get a 100% packet loss result ought to check your firewall settings to make sure that you don't have other ports open to the world...
Logged
  Eric
Pages: [1] 2 3