Kitz ADSL Broadband Information
adsl spacer  
Support this site
Home Broadband ISPs Tech Routers Wiki Forum
 
     
   Compare ISP   Rate your ISP
   Glossary   Glossary
 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Author Topic: Why Internal Antennas Are Better for Home Wi-Fi  (Read 1553 times)

neil

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 502
Why Internal Antennas Are Better for Home Wi-Fi
« on: August 12, 2022, 04:59:10 PM »

Quote from: eyenetworks
Why Internal Antennas Are Better for Home Wi-Fi
Here, we explain the difference between internal and external Wi-Fi antennas and why internal antennas provide the best wireless coverage in the home.

Here, we explain the difference between internal and external Wi-Fi antennas and why internal antennas provide the best wireless coverage in the home, while external antennas provide a coverage area that resembles a doughnut.

All wireless equipment needs antennas to communicate. Some have visible, external antennas, others have internal antennas that we cannot see.

Her i Eye Networks forhandler vi trådløse tilgangspunkter (aksesspunkter) med interne antenner. Se våre wifi-løsninger her.

We constantly see articles and get questions based on the assumption that external antennas provide better coverage or higher transmission strength than internal antennas, regardless of scenario.

This is not true, but internal and external antennas have different strengths and weaknesses that make them suitable for different uses.

Let's start at the beginning.

Vis innlegg

What do we mean by internal and external antennas?
Internal antennas are located inside the device and are usually not visible to the user.

For wireless clients — that is, mobile phones, computers, and other devices — internal antennas are completely dominant. For wireless equipment such as routers, modems, repeaters and IADs, there are still many vendors that use external Wi-Fi antennas.

Several types of external and internal antennas are in use, but for wireless products for the home, you will see these two almost exclusively:

Internal PIFA antennas, which are used in the AirTies wireless access points, among others. This is also the type of antenna that is used in most mobile phones.
P in PIFA stands for plan. IF stands for inverted F.
External dipole antennas, still common on many routers and other devices with wireless functionality.
"Dipole" means that it consists of two identical, conductive elements/poles.
The illustration shows simplified models of an inverted F antenna, which looks like an F lying down, and a dipole antenna, two interconnected poles.
With external Wi-Fi antenna you get doughnut-shaped coverage
External dipole antennas can be controlled directionally. Thus, if the antennas are perfectly positioned, they can provide a stronger signal in a given direction. Directionally controlling signals works best outdoors where there are few obstacles to signals. Indoors, the obstacles are so many that Multipath technology (MIMO), which allows the signals to take multiple paths simultaneously to the client, usually will work better than directional control.

For Multipath minimizing the blind zone is also an advantage.

External dipole antennas have a blind zone of 60 degrees extending upwards and downwards, making the signal pattern of a typical dipole antenna look like a huge doughnut. This means that signal strength for floors above and/or below the antenna will be weaker.

The coverage area for external dipole antennas is doughnut shaped with a hole in the middle. The coverage area around a device surrounded by PIFA antennas is pretty much shaped like a sphere or a ball.
Internal Wi-Fi antennas get you Wi-Fi coverage (almost) shaped like a ball
Internal PIFA antennas provide a pattern that is more spherical and stretches in any direction. The pattern is influenced by how grounding has been done and the size of the circuit board in the unit – therefore it is not entirely sphere-shaped, but it will still distribute the signals much more evenly than the external antenna.


Internal PIFA antennas inside a Zyxel WX3401.
In simple terms, an external antenna could provide coverage that extends farther away from the transmitter, while the internal antenna provides more complete coverage. The blind zone is minimized, also providing better conditions for Multipath technology.

Minimal Efficiency Differences
Basically, an external antenna has an efficiency of around 95, while the PIFA efficiency is around 75. In practice, the efficiency of internal and external antennas are still almost equal.

Because the antennas are literally external, they also need to be connected by cable, and the connection points and cable provide an efficiency loss that reduces the difference. Where the wires intersect with electronic components, these will also add interference.


Router with external antennas
The connectors on the circuit board may sometimes loosen because of rough handling, such as during transport, thereby causing unreliable contact and weaker effects.

External antennas have the best aerial gain
Antenna gain or gain is the ratio of how effective the antenna is, the direction it transmits in, and how effective an imaginary antenna with no signal loss would be.

Because antenna gain is a measure that combines efficiency with directional control, external antennas get the better results. However, this assumes that you are only looking at points that lie within the antenna's doughnut-shaped coverage field, in the direction that the antenna is pointing.

In other words, internal antennas have slightly lower aerial gain, but they deliver signals with the same efficiency in a larger area.

No differences in transmission power on internal and external antennas
Here there is literally no difference. The transmission power of wireless equipment used in Norway is strictly regulated by law. Regardless of internal or external antennas, all equipment is subject to the same maximum limits. Attempting to amplify or "boost" the antenna, will in many cases take the transmission strength up to an illegal level. For more information on the rules and pitfalls when attempting to amplify your signals, see the article Why Boosting Your Wi-Fi Signal Is a Bad Idea

Internal Antennas + Multipath = Best Indoors
For indoor home use, a combination of internal antennas and Multipath technology provides the most even coverage and the fewest blind zones, minimizing the risk of misaligned antennas.

So when is it better to use external antennas?
Direction control is the main strength of external antennas. They are therefore particularly well suited for outdoor use.

Article by Jan Pedro Tumusok and Jorunn D. Newth

https://eyenetworks.no/en/why-internal-antennas-are-better-for-home-wifi/

(Please go to the website for images)

[Moderator edited to insert an attribution to the quoted text, as they were not Neil's own words.]
« Last Edit: August 12, 2022, 06:21:20 PM by burakkucat »
Logged
VDSL FTTC 35/18

Alex Atkin UK

  • Addicted Kitizen
  • *****
  • Posts: 5272
    • Thinkbroadband Quality Monitors
Re: Why Internal Antennas Are Better for Home Wi-Fi
« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2022, 06:30:11 PM »

A good article, although obviously there is no one size fits all solution.  Sometimes external will still be better, as the shape of your house might require it.  There's also historically been some pretty terrible internal antenna implementations, the range on the old Virgin Hub for example was really bad.

Its gotten a lot better since there has been so much focus on MIMO to improve speeds, rather than just pushing the channel width wider, especially as a wider channel width also tends to reduce range.

Ultimately for the best WiFi coverage, you want to be going through as few obstacles as possible.  Ideally you'd have an Access Point in every room you need good coverage in, with a signal that doesn't leave that room at all.  But few people are willing to run ethernet to multiple rooms or pay for multiple Access Points, so we have half-arsed solutions like wireless MESH.

There's also the fact that in things like desktop PCs, externally antennas are ALWAYS the way to go, as the PC case itself will block too much of the signal.   I'm kinda surprised there isn't a market for PC cases with integrated antennas to get the best of both worlds.
Logged
Broadband: Zen Full Fibre 900 + Three 5G Routers: pfSense (Intel N100) + Huawei CPE Pro 2 H122-373 WiFi: Zyxel NWA210AX
Switches: Netgear MS510TXUP, Netgear MS510TXPP, Netgear GS110EMX My Broadband History & Ping Monitors

neil

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 502
Re: Why Internal Antennas Are Better for Home Wi-Fi
« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2022, 06:38:01 PM »

A good article, although obviously there is no one size fits all solution.  Sometimes external will still be better, as the shape of your house might require it.  There's also historically been some pretty terrible internal antenna implementations, the range on the old Virgin Hub for example was really bad.

Its gotten a lot better since there has been so much focus on MIMO to improve speeds, rather than just pushing the channel width wider, especially as a wider channel width also tends to reduce range.

Ultimately for the best WiFi coverage, you want to be going through as few obstacles as possible.  Ideally you'd have an Access Point in every room you need good coverage in, with a signal that doesn't leave that room at all.  But few people are willing to run ethernet to multiple rooms or pay for multiple Access Points, so we have half-arsed solutions like wireless MESH.

There's also the fact that in things like desktop PCs, externally antennas are ALWAYS the way to go, as the PC case itself will block too much of the signal.   I'm kinda surprised there isn't a market for PC cases with integrated antennas to get the best of both worlds.

Yes, I never saw a desktop PC case with internal antennas. Even desktop PC manufacturers like Dell and HP don't manufacture desktop PC with enternal antennas?

and what's the difference between 5dBi and 9dBi antennas?
« Last Edit: August 12, 2022, 06:51:35 PM by neil »
Logged
VDSL FTTC 35/18

Weaver

  • Senior Kitizen
  • ******
  • Posts: 11459
  • Retd s/w dev; A&A; 4x7km ADSL2 lines; Firebrick
Re: Why Internal Antennas Are Better for Home Wi-Fi
« Reply #3 on: August 12, 2022, 06:46:36 PM »

I bought five ZyXEL WAPs, which cost me an absolute fortune. Two got damaged by water, iirc. And I have two in use and possibly a third in stock as a spare. If Janet can find the third in her stock control system, that is. They each have four external antennas. Currently there’s an upstairs one and a downstairs one.
Logged