Kitz ADSL Broadband Information
adsl spacer  
Support this site
Home Broadband ISPs Tech Routers Wiki Forum
 
     
   Compare ISP   Rate your ISP
   Glossary   Glossary
 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Author Topic: BT Q1 2020/21 Results  (Read 577 times)

gt94sss2

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1025
BT Q1 2020/21 Results
« on: July 31, 2020, 07:20:02 PM »

Quote
BT has today published their Q1 2020/21 results, which reveals that Openreach has expanded their “ultrafast broadband” ISP network to cover 5.81 million UK premises (up from 5.4m last quarter) and that includes 2.98m on FTTP (up from 2.57m) and 2.83m on G.fast (up from 2.81m). Plus 5G via EE is now live in 100 cities and towns.

https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2020/07/bt-raise-uk-ultrafast-broadband-cover-to-5-81-million-premises.html

https://www.bt.com/about/investors/financial-reporting-and-news/results-events-and-financial-calendar/2020-21


Logged

Bowdon

  • Content Team
  • Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 2138
Re: BT Q1 2020/21 Results
« Reply #1 on: August 02, 2020, 01:56:44 PM »

It is amazing really how fast FTTP deployment as overtaken G.fast numbers.

I'm assuming the numbers are the maximum available connections rather than actual connections?

It makes me wonder what would happen if G.fast had never been done how fast FTTP deployment would have been with a lot more engineers working on it.
Logged
BT Infinity 2 - Smart Hub 6 - ECI Cab

Alex Atkin UK

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1740
    • My Broadband History
Re: BT Q1 2020/21 Results
« Reply #2 on: August 03, 2020, 02:13:23 AM »

I'm not sure it would have helped that much, there must be a lot of people on each cabinet WAY too far away to get G.fast.  Whereas FTTP, distance is much less of an issue.
Logged
INTAKE (ECI) Zen: Home Hub 5A OpenWrt Plusnet: VMG-3925-B10B Three 4G: Hauwei B535-232 Router: pfSense (i5-7200U) WiFi: Ubiquiti nanoHD
Thinkbroadband Quality Monitors

CarlT

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1697
  • Software Defined WAN deployment engineer
Re: BT Q1 2020/21 Results
« Reply #3 on: August 03, 2020, 01:22:46 PM »

It makes me wonder what would happen if G.fast had never been done how fast FTTP deployment would have been with a lot more engineers working on it.

Wouldn't have made much difference to be honest. It wasn't an either-or at that time regrettably, there was robust opposition to the investment required to deliver FTTP. Openreach told government they'd deliver way more premises passed than were feasible with FTTP and set about the work on that basis.

At some point the priority changed, within government, to quality as well as quantity and gigabit-capable rather than just 'ultrafast' became a thing.
Logged
WiFi: Nighthawk® AX12 RAX120
Routing: pfSense VM
Switching: Mikrotik 2* CRS305-1G-4S-IN, 1 * CRS309-1G-8S+; various cheap and cheerful TP-Link/Netgear
Exchange: Wakefield
ISP: BT Full Fibre 900. Zen Full Fibre 900.
 

anything