Imho, we shouldn’t take upon ourselves to publicise things we are not qualified to understand. Doing so presents two dangers...
1.There’s a danger of publicising bad science, science that is flawed.
2. There’s a danger of misunderstanding the science, even if it is good, possibly drawing the wrong conclusions, and publicising them.
Once an individual like Greta intervenes, true scientific debate becomes more difficult. I’m not qualified to participate in the debate at technical level but it certainly makes more sceptical. Same goes for Lawson’s interventions by the way, I am automatically sceptical of anything he may say on climate science. Though that worries me less as he gets less media coverage,
Unlike total and utter prats like Nigel Lawson
May I suggest that we avoid abusive language? Being rude about a person with whom you (and many of us) disagree does not prove them to be wrong, and nor does prove you to be right..