Kitz ADSL Broadband Information
adsl spacer  
Support this site
Home Broadband ISPs Tech Routers Wiki Forum
 
     
   Compare ISP   Rate your ISP
   Glossary   Glossary
 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 12

Author Topic: Odd shaped SNR-vs-tone graph - line #4 fault again  (Read 21666 times)

burakkucat

  • Respected
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 38300
  • Over the Rainbow Bridge
    • The ELRepo Project
Re: Odd shaped SNR-vs-tone graph - line #4 fault aga
« Reply #75 on: August 24, 2020, 03:51:17 PM »

Ah, asked Janet which pole she meant. Today, Monday, our man went up the lower pole by the far side of the road, further away from the house. I think I misunderstood before; I was thinking that it cannot be the pole near the house as there are afaik no joints on it.

Obviously I only have a "snapshot in time" to view and then only at the lower, road-side, pole. That is the one with a BT66 at the top, to house the joints between the two aerial drops (from "The Weaving Shed") and the tail, running down the pole, linking to the D-side cables.

Quote
Finally, fixed !

Anyway, second man came out around midday and fixed the problem at that pole. The line 4 is now running at 2.832 Mbps d/s @ 3.2 dB SNRM, 550kbps upstream @ 5.8 dB SNRM.

Excellent news. (Let's hope that the haggis do not decide to climb the pole and gnaw on the freshly re-made joints.  ::)  )
Logged
:cat:  100% Linux and, previously, Unix. Co-founder of the ELRepo Project.

Please consider making a donation to support the running of this site.

Weaver

  • Senior Kitizen
  • ******
  • Posts: 11459
  • Retd s/w dev; A&A; 4x7km ADSL2 lines; Firebrick
Re: Odd shaped SNR-vs-tone graph - line #4 fault again
« Reply #76 on: August 24, 2020, 04:12:31 PM »

I’m afraid that in the past we have had evidence that haggises can climb poles.  :(
« Last Edit: August 25, 2020, 01:04:46 PM by Weaver »
Logged

Weaver

  • Senior Kitizen
  • ******
  • Posts: 11459
  • Retd s/w dev; A&A; 4x7km ADSL2 lines; Firebrick
Re: Odd shaped SNR-vs-tone graph - line #4 fault again
« Reply #77 on: August 25, 2020, 01:10:32 PM »

Notes received by AA from first engineer, on saturday:

Quote
Note Engineer could not complete the work. As per his notes "I cannot complete this task because of a hazard owned by Openreach / third party. Unable to climb pole at dp72 as I am in a loan van and do not have my climbing harness is preventing further work. Please see additional information: Pair is faulty from joint feeding dp72 faulty towards Eu; unable to climb pole as I am in loan van and no harness to climb. Hence creating CSS Task and assigning the job to SN Team and completing action item. Review by date 26/08/2020."
Logged

burakkucat

  • Respected
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 38300
  • Over the Rainbow Bridge
    • The ELRepo Project
Re: Odd shaped SNR-vs-tone graph - line #4 fault again
« Reply #78 on: August 25, 2020, 05:11:35 PM »

Ah, so that was the reason and not a dangerous pole, as originally thought.
Logged
:cat:  100% Linux and, previously, Unix. Co-founder of the ELRepo Project.

Please consider making a donation to support the running of this site.

Weaver

  • Senior Kitizen
  • ******
  • Posts: 11459
  • Retd s/w dev; A&A; 4x7km ADSL2 lines; Firebrick
Re: Odd shaped SNR-vs-tone graph - line #4 fault again
« Reply #79 on: August 25, 2020, 05:20:05 PM »

The dangerous pole must have been Janet thinking about the upper pole - some confusion there anyway.
Logged

Weaver

  • Senior Kitizen
  • ******
  • Posts: 11459
  • Retd s/w dev; A&A; 4x7km ADSL2 lines; Firebrick
Re: Odd shaped SNR-vs-tone graph - line #4 fault again
« Reply #80 on: September 09, 2020, 10:50:50 AM »

And here we go again. The fix didn’t last; the fault has come back on line 4 (and line 2 - the most recently installed).


xdslctl: ADSL driver and PHY status
Status: Showtime
Last Retrain Reason:   8000
Last initialization procedure status:   0
Max:   Upstream rate = 515 Kbps, Downstream rate = 2552 Kbps
Bearer:   0, Upstream rate = 560 Kbps, Downstream rate = 2310 Kbps

Link Power State:   L0
Mode:         ADSL2 Annex A
TPS-TC:         ATM Mode(0x0)
Trellis:      U:ON /D:ON
Line Status:      No Defect
Training Status:   Showtime
      Down      Up
SNR (dB):    6.1       5.9
Attn(dB):    65.0       41.5
Pwr(dBm):    18.1       12.4

         ADSL2 framing
         Bearer 0
MSGc:      52      13
B:      26      62
M:      8      1
T:      3      1
R:      16      14
S:      2.9414      3.5402
L:      631      174
D:      1      8

         Counters
         Bearer 0
SF:      752848      719419
SFErr:      0      1
RS:      16374447      770625
RSCorr:      601      7297
RSUnCorr:   0      0

ReXmt:      707      0
ReXmtCorr:   707      0
ReXmtUnCorr:   0      0

         Bearer 0
HEC:      0      0
OCD:      0      0
LCD:      0      0
Total Cells:   65909686      15978087
Data Cells:   679324      183175
Drop Cells:   0
Bit Errors:   0      722

ES:      644552      1332
SES:      1771      1
UAS:      64990      63853
AS:      12095

         Bearer 0
INP:      26.00      2.50
INPRein:   0.00      0.00
delay:      8      7
PER:      15.99      16.81
OR:      29.01      9.03
AgR:      2329.95   567.23

Bitswap:   487/487      47/47

Total time = 74 days 13 hours 28 min 11 sec
FEC:      26852419      2238836
CRC:      947821      1308
ES:      644552      1332
SES:      1771      1
UAS:      64990      63853
LOS:      83      0
LOF:      438      0
LOM:      51      0
Latest 15 minutes time = 13 min 11 sec
FEC:      40      474
CRC:      0      0
ES:      0      0
SES:      0      0
UAS:      0      0
LOS:      0      0
LOF:      0      0
LOM:      0      0
Previous 15 minutes time = 15 min 0 sec
FEC:      45      507
CRC:      0      0
ES:      0      0
SES:      0      0
UAS:      0      0
LOS:      0      0
LOF:      0      0
LOM:      0      0
Latest 1 day time = 13 hours 28 min 11 sec
FEC:      9550      10960
CRC:      484      1
ES:      18738      1
SES:      10      0
UAS:      119      109
LOS:      1      0
LOF:      9      0
LOM:      0      0
Previous 1 day time = 24 hours 0 sec
FEC:      0      0
CRC:      0      0
ES:      25757      9
SES:      0      0
UAS:      0      0
LOS:      0      0
LOF:      0      0
LOM:      0      0
Since Link time = 3 hours 21 min 35 sec
FEC:      601      7297
CRC:      0      1
ES:      0      1
SES:      0      0
UAS:      0      0
LOS:      0      0
LOF:      0      0
LOM:      0      0
NTR: mipsCntAtNtr=0 ncoCntAtNtr=0
Logged

burakkucat

  • Respected
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 38300
  • Over the Rainbow Bridge
    • The ELRepo Project
Re: Odd shaped SNR-vs-tone graph - line #4 fault again
« Reply #81 on: September 09, 2020, 03:54:04 PM »

I must be having another bad day.  :(

Please enlighten me by explaining what I am supposed to be seeing when I look at that latest statistics output. For example, I see --

ES:      644552      1332
SES:       1771         1

But that appears to be spread over --

Total time = 74 days 13 hours 28 min 11 sec
Logged
:cat:  100% Linux and, previously, Unix. Co-founder of the ELRepo Project.

Please consider making a donation to support the running of this site.

Weaver

  • Senior Kitizen
  • ******
  • Posts: 11459
  • Retd s/w dev; A&A; 4x7km ADSL2 lines; Firebrick
Re: Odd shaped SNR-vs-tone graph - line #4 fault again
« Reply #82 on: September 09, 2020, 04:48:58 PM »

You are not the only one.  :)  What perplexes you? Are those values implausible?
Logged

burakkucat

  • Respected
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 38300
  • Over the Rainbow Bridge
    • The ELRepo Project
Re: Odd shaped SNR-vs-tone graph - line #4 fault again
« Reply #83 on: September 09, 2020, 05:11:24 PM »

A block of data, such as the above, really tells nothing. Unless there is a reference data set with which it can be compared.

I presume you have looked at the various plots and are seeing an "eroded summit", once again? Do you experience a problem when just using the service?

Hmm . . . Not sure what else I can really type.  :(
Logged
:cat:  100% Linux and, previously, Unix. Co-founder of the ELRepo Project.

Please consider making a donation to support the running of this site.

Weaver

  • Senior Kitizen
  • ******
  • Posts: 11459
  • Retd s/w dev; A&A; 4x7km ADSL2 lines; Firebrick
Re: Odd shaped SNR-vs-tone graph - line #4 fault again
« Reply #84 on: September 11, 2020, 07:48:14 AM »

It’s back to the same hollow at the summit, yes. The loss of downstream sync rate an as bad as it as before (not yet anyway).

for comparison, here’s modem 3:

xdslctl: ADSL driver and PHY status
Status: Showtime
Last Retrain Reason:   8000
Last initialization procedure status:   0
Max:   Upstream rate = 312 Kbps, Downstream rate = 3200 Kbps
Bearer:   0, Upstream rate = 376 Kbps, Downstream rate = 2861 Kbps

Link Power State:   L0
Mode:         ADSL2 Annex A
TPS-TC:         ATM Mode(0x0)
Trellis:      U:ON /D:ON
Line Status:      No Defect
Training Status:   Showtime
      Down      Up
SNR (dB):    3.2       6.1
Attn(dB):    65.0       41.2
Pwr(dBm):    18.2       12.4

         ADSL2 framing
         Bearer 0
MSGc:      53      11
B:      32      5
M:      4      16
T:      3      8
R:      10      14
S:      1.4508      8.0000
L:      783      110
D:      2      4

         Counters
         Bearer 0
SF:      237508496      852465
SFErr:      4587      176
RS:      1919816364      4293165
RSCorr:      1011080      99952
RSUnCorr:   23782      0

ReXmt:      520206      0
ReXmtCorr:   473853      0
ReXmtUnCorr:   25343      0

         Bearer 0
HEC:      23603      170
OCD:      576      0
LCD:      576      0
Total Cells:   140982884      3404393386
Data Cells:   1332365539      178176483
Drop Cells:   0
Bit Errors:   662586      18580

ES:      2419      161
SES:      3      0
UAS:      53      53
AS:      3839699

         Bearer 0
INP:      26.00      2.00
INPRein:   0.00      0.00
delay:      8      8
PER:      16.04      17.00
OR:      29.40      8.00
AgR:      2878.13   382.50

Bitswap:   939067/939151      48693/48693

Total time = 44 days 10 hours 35 min 52 sec
FEC:      1011080      99952
CRC:      4587      176
ES:      2419      161
SES:      3      0
UAS:      53      53
LOS:      0      0
LOF:      0      0
LOM:      0      0
Latest 15 minutes time = 5 min 52 sec
FEC:      3      0
CRC:      0      0
ES:      0      0
SES:      0      0
UAS:      0      0
LOS:      0      0
LOF:      0      0
LOM:      0      0
Previous 15 minutes time = 15 min 0 sec
FEC:      5      5
CRC:      0      0
ES:      0      0
SES:      0      0
UAS:      0      0
LOS:      0      0
LOF:      0      0
LOM:      0      0
Latest 1 day time = 10 hours 35 min 52 sec
FEC:      691      285
CRC:      0      0
ES:      0      0
SES:      0      0
UAS:      0      0
LOS:      0      0
LOF:      0      0
LOM:      0      0
Previous 1 day time = 24 hours 0 sec
FEC:      1955      1665
CRC:      5      6
ES:      3      6
SES:      0      0
UAS:      0      0
LOS:      0      0
LOF:      0      0
LOM:      0      0
Since Link time = 44 days 10 hours 34 min 57 sec
FEC:      1011080      99952
CRC:      4587      176
ES:      2419      161
SES:      3      0
UAS:      0      0
LOS:      0      0
LOF:      0      0
LOM:      0      0
NTR: mipsCntAtNtr=0 ncoCntAtNtr=0


« Last Edit: September 11, 2020, 07:52:17 AM by Weaver »
Logged

Weaver

  • Senior Kitizen
  • ******
  • Posts: 11459
  • Retd s/w dev; A&A; 4x7km ADSL2 lines; Firebrick
Re: Odd shaped SNR-vs-tone graph - line #4 fault again
« Reply #85 on: September 11, 2020, 07:57:25 AM »

Here’s the modem 4 SNR-vs-tones graph :

Logged

burakkucat

  • Respected
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 38300
  • Over the Rainbow Bridge
    • The ELRepo Project
Re: Odd shaped SNR-vs-tone graph - line #4 fault again
« Reply #86 on: September 11, 2020, 03:56:23 PM »

I wish we could determine the actual, physical, cause of the "eroded summit" effect. Knowing the cause, even if it cannot be mitigated, would help alleviate so much of the head-scratching.  :(
Logged
:cat:  100% Linux and, previously, Unix. Co-founder of the ELRepo Project.

Please consider making a donation to support the running of this site.

Weaver

  • Senior Kitizen
  • ******
  • Posts: 11459
  • Retd s/w dev; A&A; 4x7km ADSL2 lines; Firebrick
Re: Odd shaped SNR-vs-tone graph - line #4 fault again
« Reply #87 on: September 11, 2020, 11:55:47 PM »

What we do know, for certain, is that BTOR can see the fault on their JDSUs or whatever, and can fix it successfully, but only for a while. When they have fixed it it just comes back at some point, but I’m not sure about the level-vs-time reappearance of the fault. I have never seen anything like it before this summer. Line 2 and line 4 are the two pairs in the same drop cable, btw.
Logged

burakkucat

  • Respected
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 38300
  • Over the Rainbow Bridge
    • The ELRepo Project
Re: Odd shaped SNR-vs-tone graph - line #4 fault again
« Reply #88 on: September 12, 2020, 12:14:54 AM »

Line 2 and line 4 are the two pairs in the same drop cable, btw.

The newer aerial drop of the two which rise from the low-level, road-side, pole. (I am amused by drops which actually rise.) However I do not think that the two lines, which intermittently show the problem, being in the same drop cable is significant. That is to say I think it is just a co-incidence.

The head-scratching continues.
Logged
:cat:  100% Linux and, previously, Unix. Co-founder of the ELRepo Project.

Please consider making a donation to support the running of this site.

Weaver

  • Senior Kitizen
  • ******
  • Posts: 11459
  • Retd s/w dev; A&A; 4x7km ADSL2 lines; Firebrick
Re: Odd shaped SNR-vs-tone graph - line #4 fault again
« Reply #89 on: September 12, 2020, 05:56:23 PM »

I’m wondering about when to keep reporting these two lines; as they get slower there comes an arbitrary point where I choose to report them as ‘bad’ (sufficiently). I hate to keep on bothering AA again and again, like a cracked record. But the sooner I report them, the less time I have to put up with reduced downstream speed.

What do you think is reasonable ? Wait till a line becomes an FTB ?

I can’t remember what the percentage is - Kitz will tell me somewhere - but I don’t have to remember as clueless puts it up in your face - at the very top of its main system state display page it displays a list of any lines that are in breach of the fault threshold rate, so as to alert you.

My neighbour has built a house next door to me and has presumably put in phone lines. I wonder if that is the source of all of these problems?

How would you physically run new lines into a new dwelling?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 12