Kitz ADSL Broadband Information
adsl spacer  
Support this site
Home Broadband ISPs Tech Routers Wiki Forum
   Compare ISP   Rate your ISP
   Glossary   Glossary
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  


Author Topic: B4RN Suspends New EIS Investments into its UK FTTH Rollout  (Read 358 times)


  • Content Team
  • Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1931
B4RN Suspends New EIS Investments into its UK FTTH Rollout
« on: December 03, 2018, 10:41:16 AM »

The B4RN (Broadband for the Rural North) project, which is deploying a community built and funded 1Gbps “full fibre” (FTTH) rural broadband network to homes in several counties, have taken the hopefully temporary decision not to process new EIS1 forms (Enterprise Investment Scheme) for investments made into the ISP.

So far B4RN’s Fibre-to-the-Home (FTTH) network has been a wonderful success, not least due to the way in which they’ve encouraged volunteers in each area to help build the network (usually in exchange for shares instead of cash). The model also relies on local landowners (e.g. farmers) being generous and agreeing to waive their right to payment under a wayleave (access) agreement, which enables the fibre to be cheaply dug through their land.

Overall more than 5,000 connections have been made to the network and their approach has been mirrored by a number of other community FTTH builds across the UK. As part of this effort B4RN have also been a member of the Government’s Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS) since 2011, which offers tax reliefs to individual investors who buy new shares in the company.

However the new Finance Act 2018 has introduced some changes to the EIS scheme and as a result HMRC has announced that they will be testing B4RN’s compliance with the new “risk to capital” rule.

    FA2018 Extract – Risk-to-capital condition

    (1) The risk-to-capital condition is met if, having regard to all the circumstances existing at the time of the issue of the shares, it would be reasonable to conclude that-

    (a) the issuing company has objectives to grow and develop its trade in the long-term, and

    (b) there is a significant risk that there will be a loss of capital of an amount greater than the net investment return.

    NOTE: The latter condition is to be considered for investors generally, rather than any specific investor.

The new rule applies from Royal Assent on 15th March 2018, however, since 4th December 2017 HMRC have refused to provide advance assurance if it does not appear that the risk to capital condition is met. B4RN’s boss already claims to have provided a “prompt and detailed response to HMRC’s enquiries” and they expect to learn the outcome early next month.

The provider has said they are “confident” that B4RN will remain eligible for EIS but in the meantime they’ve decided to play it safe by confirming that they will not be processing any new EIS1 forms for investments made into their company (covering the period from 15th March 2018 to present), until they know the outcome.

    Barry Forde, B4RN’s CEO, said:

    “In the interests of openness and transparency, B4RN’s directors have decided today to place this information in the public domain so that investors are fully aware of this situation.

    Broadband for the Rural North Ltd was authorised by HMRC to issue Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS) compliance certificates on the 2nd December 2011 making investment in B4RN withdrawable shares eligible for tax relief under the Enterprise Investment Scheme.

    On the 14th October 2018 HMRC announced they would be testing our compliance with a new ‘risk to capital’ rule brought in as part of the Finance Act 2018. This rule came in to force on the 15th March 2018.

    The rule states that for investors there must be a significant risk to capital greater than the net investment return. This test was introduced to avoid abuse of EIS by schemes that were structured to obtain tax relief but pose no real risk to investors.

    B4RN have made a prompt and detailed response to HMRC’s enquiries and expect to receive a formal decision in early December 2018.

    Whilst B4RN’s directors are confident that B4RN continues to remain eligible for EIS, HMRC have decided in the interim not to process EIS1 forms for investments made in B4RN after the 15th March 2018 until they have made their determination.

    We will also be contacting investors who have invested in B4RN shares since the 15th March 2018 and who are waiting for EIS3 forms.”
BT Infinity 2 - Smart Hub 6 - ECI Cab


  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 26888
  • Over the Rainbow Bridge
    • The ELRepo Project
Re: B4RN Suspends New EIS Investments into its UK FTTH Rollout
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2018, 04:31:39 PM »

I wonder if Walter, the holder of both the very first and the one millionth shares in B4RN might be able to comment? Also, I wonder if this has had any effect on the recent newcomer, B4SH.
« Last Edit: December 03, 2018, 04:36:15 PM by burakkucat »
:cat:  100% Linux and, previously, Unix. Co-founder of the ELRepo Project.

Please consider making a donation to support the running of this site.


  • Content Team
  • Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 2772
Re: B4RN Suspends New EIS Investments into its UK FTTH Rollout
« Reply #2 on: December 03, 2018, 05:14:51 PM »

I can confirm that we (Broadband for Surrey Hills) corresponded with HMRC and that they suggested that SITR** might be a more appropriate vehicle to provide the 30% income tax rebate only for private individuals.
I.e. Corporate bodies can't claim that relief as they don't pay income tax.

We submitted our details and were pleased that HMRC were prepared to issue advance assurance to that effect.
Thus we have not been affected by the current situation Barry Forde describes.

The HMRC department dealing with these matters has admitted to a heavy workload for their staff so I applaud Barry Forde's caution in these circumstances even though it might delay some new investors.
I have not corresponded with B4RN on these matters but it's not impossible that their statement could also be an attempt to expedite a resolution.
It most certainly would not be the first time that obfuscation has had quite a negative effect against Politicians' warm words !

** Social Investment Tax Relief