I'm not sure where the anti-CityFibre opinion is coming from?
I'm getting tired of reading all their press releases telling us how rubbish something is.
Regarding this latest release, the broadband speed ranking comes from the dubious
speedtest based thing which ranked the UK worse than a lot of other reports. CityFibre only prints an average
download speed next to the faster than the uk column in their table, then they talk about
uploading holiday photos. Then there's the issue about if average home broadband speeds in a country are linked to the speeds a tourist in a holiday resort might get. What are beaches even covered by - wifi or mobile broadband?
But the cause of fighting for the proper definitions is a noble one that could prompt ISP's to be forced to not adventise FTTC as 'Fibre'.
And if claims management companies want to get in on the compensation for your miss-sold fake fibre FTTC broadband, presumably they'll be nobly helping people to get the compensation they're entitled to.