Kitz ADSL Broadband Information
adsl spacer  
Support this site
Home Broadband ISPs Tech Routers Wiki Forum
 
     
   Compare ISP   Rate your ISP
   Glossary   Glossary
 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Naked FTTC / VDSL Only  (Read 2572 times)

CarlT

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1676
  • Next generation network design and deployment
Re: Naked FTTC / VDSL Only
« Reply #15 on: December 30, 2018, 02:22:56 PM »

In Germany they deployed Annex J where there was no POTS, ISDN was a lot more of a thing there so digital voice.

Crosstalk is as frequency dependent as everything else. The higher the frequency the higher the attenuation.

Having xDSL crosstalking with POTS is bad and crosstalk would, at a raw power level, probably be worse at the receiver at lower frequencies due to lower attenuation between transmitter, a modem, and receiver, your ears. Ever pick up a handset while a dialup call is in progress on the same line?
Logged
WiFi: Nighthawk® AX12 RAX120 - 5Gb uplink
Routing: pfSense VM - 10Gb in and indeed out
Switching: 2 * Mikrotik CRS305-1G-4S-IN, 10Gb uplinks, various cheap and cheerful
Exchange: Wakefield
ISP: BT Full Fibre 900. Zen Full Fibre 900. Zoom, zoom.

Weaver

  • Addicted Kitizen
  • *****
  • Posts: 8972
  • Retd sw dev; A&A; 4 × 7km ADSL2; IPv6; Firebrick
Re: Naked FTTC / VDSL Only
« Reply #16 on: January 19, 2019, 04:28:57 AM »

Sorry Carl, could you explain a little more? Why would the received crosstalk absolute power level be higher at very low frequencies than at frequencies above the audio range? And anyway, there can’t be that much crosstalk power level at the very lowest frequencies because users would be complaining about voice-voice channel crosstalk being heard.
Logged

CarlT

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1676
  • Next generation network design and deployment
Re: Naked FTTC / VDSL Only
« Reply #17 on: January 19, 2019, 04:52:56 PM »

The higher the frequency of anything the higher the attenuation during transmission. Whether that's the desired signal or noise ingress.
Logged
WiFi: Nighthawk® AX12 RAX120 - 5Gb uplink
Routing: pfSense VM - 10Gb in and indeed out
Switching: 2 * Mikrotik CRS305-1G-4S-IN, 10Gb uplinks, various cheap and cheerful
Exchange: Wakefield
ISP: BT Full Fibre 900. Zen Full Fibre 900. Zoom, zoom.

Weaver

  • Addicted Kitizen
  • *****
  • Posts: 8972
  • Retd sw dev; A&A; 4 × 7km ADSL2; IPv6; Firebrick
Re: Naked FTTC / VDSL Only
« Reply #18 on: January 21, 2019, 07:11:08 AM »

Indeed.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
 

anything