No ..... that's just your misconstrued thoughts on the subject.
Understood. I would welcome your input on why my FTTC line delivers about 62Mb throughput and this is considered exceptional for my distance from the node.
Seems to me my service is impacted by distance from the node.
To make it worse if the 1Gb option were available to me I would quite happily take it. I don't pay for my broadband and the tax bill on it I can claim relief for. Just to add to the fun it would be a pretty cheap deployment as the DP is fully ducted with swept tees.
I was quoted a mere couple of grand per premises if I pursue the community funded route, which seems a bit strange given Virgin Media reckon it'll cost about 800 quid to deliver cable to me including all civils through a bunch of block paving, and a 'third party' quoted about 300 quid per premises to deliver FTTP via PIA.
Your employer is in no way prepared to overbuild FTTC with FTTP as they need to sweat the FTTC investment to get some returns from it. A real bummer when you look at areas like this one where the FTTC investment is paying for itself pretty rapidly and compare them to a whole bunch of areas that received FTTC pretty early in the rollout and haven't sold much.
This one commercially unviable cabinet has filled a Huawei 288 and is on the 5th card of a second Huawei 288. The first Huawei is probably paid for with the second, much cheaper installation not far off breaking even at all.
If you could offer me some insight as to why my community are subsidising all of these commercially viable areas that Openreach deployed FTTC to before us that'd be awesome, alongside why a bunch of high streets and business parks that weren't considered worth a couple of hundred quid per premises for FTTC are worthy of way more for FTTP while we are not.