Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[j0hn]

ECI
Fastpath: 55 down 6.8 up

Huawei
Fastpath: 54 down 11 up

Reckon G.INP will increase that a little. Lower target SNRM should help too.

Important to note for good comparison that the D-Side has remained completely unchanged. My phone line has remained active between the change of cabinet. The Hlog/QLN differ slightly but that may be the tie cables or how the DSLAM's interpret the line differently.

I've had to cap my line as it smashes ES limits on fastpath when my crosstalker is online

[Chrysalis]

you got a comparison of bitloading for US?

[burakkucat]

Seems I will soon be one of a few ECI people left on here soon.

Don't forget Kitz. 

[Chrysalis]

me kitz and skyeci

[skyeci]

 

Shame as I am in the new snrm profile area but being on ECI 

[tbailey2]

And myself, I look forward to getting G.INP back.

I did see someone on MDWS had G.INP enabled on an ECI cab a few days back, presumably from them having the TV service.

[atkinsong]

Me too! Also had tv since late Oct but no re-appearance of G.inp yet.

[j0hn]

you got a comparison of bitloading for US?

My line won't run fastpath without DLM hammering me, but fortunately MDWS has saved a single snapshot of my line at 55mb on the ECI cab.

[skyeci]

And myself, I look forward to getting G.INP back.

I did see someone on MDWS had G.INP enabled on an ECI cab a few days back, presumably from them having the TV service.

Hi Tony.

Can you expand please on who that might have been. When openreach were dealing with my complaint I was told taking bt tv would not bring back G.INP as I wanted it back on my line etc.

Cheers

[NewtronStar]

Would it not be better to let the DLM go through it's motions IE: fastpath for 2 days and if the ES goes above the DLM threshold then it's interleaved and at some point you'll be switched over to G.INP just thinking that manually capping the modem the DLM then thinks you don't need G.INP 

[tbailey2]

Nothing much to say really other than that I already said... The person concerned hasn't uploaded much and isn't online currently (cwave) but when he first came on MDWS he had no G.INP but a while later over two single one minute uploads uploads on the 28th Jan (and nothing since), the flag showing G.INP as enabled was set in the DSLStats upload and there was data in the corresponding G.INP data columns plus a high INP level. Whether has has the TV service I have no idea, it was something postulated on here some time back but no idea when.

His Bits/Tone are not very good for elucidating with certainly what cab he has BUT he uploaded a DSLStats result early on and that says:

Code: [Select]

Stats recorded 02 Jan 2017 21:10:44

DSLAM/MSAN type:            IFTN:0xb206 / v0xb206
Modem/router firmware:      AnnexA version - A2pvI042c.d26d
DSL mode:                   VDSL2 Profile 17a
Status:                     Showtime
Uptime:                     3 days 14 hours 36 min 30 sec
Resyncs:                    0 (since 02 Jan 2017 21:09:11)
           
                Downstream    Upstream
Line attenuation (dB):      26.2        0.0
Signal attenuation (dB):    Not monitored       
Connection speed (kbps):    16296        2190
SNR margin (dB):            4.1        6.4
Power (dBm):                6.4        6.3
Interleave depth:           319        1
INP:                        3.00        0
G.INP:                      Not enabled        Not enabled
Vectoring status:           5 (VECT_UNCONFIGURED)       

RSCorr/RS (%):              0.3610        0.0108
RSUnCorr/RS (%):            0.0002        0.0000
ES/hour:                    0        0
So ECI it is. And on that date (2nd Jan) there was no G.INP but by the 28th there was for the whole 2 minutes of upload he managed.

Maybe it was accidentally enabled - or a trial - or a glitch - or even aliens, you'll have to decide or investigate further yourself.

[j0hn]

It was probably a glitch. He did say in 1 of his posts Zyxel told him his modem was faulty. It was on that specific day too
http://forum.kitz.co.uk/index.php/topic,19135.msg341655.html#msg341655

Would it not be better to let the DLM go through it's motions IE: fastpath for 2 days and if the ES goes above the DLM threshold then it's interleaved and at some point you'll be switched over to G.INP just thinking that manually capping the modem the DLM then thinks you don't need G.INP 

I would have had thousands of ES today. The way banding is being thrown about by DLM I'm not risking that. G.INP is also set to all lines by default, no matter the ES rate. With this cap I'm still going to have almost 1000 ES today. I've no doubt G.INP will be applied.

[NewtronStar]

G.INP is also set to all lines by default, no matter the ES rate.

That is what I thought in the past but if a look at sheepie g g.inp is taking longer than expected for it's return and that is 23 days since the DLM reset

[j0hn]

Good point, but the time taken to apply it has often gone up and down. As quick as 2 days and as slow as 4 weeks. I remain under the impression that G.INP is applied to all lines that support it. Besides, I've spent the last 2 months piggy backing a 3mb ADSL line. I can live with 40mb for a couple weeks lol.

[Ronski]

. When openreach were dealing with my complaint I was told taking bt tv would not bring back G.INP as I wanted it back on my line etc.

Cheers

Should be back next month according to this.

http://forums.thinkbroadband.com/fibre/4527806-dsl-checker-gfast.html?fpart=3#Post4528034