[Apologies if we've talked about this subject before some while back, although from a different angle]
Referring to the later posts in the thread
http://forum.kitz.co.uk/index.php/topic,17237.msg317161.html#msg317161I notice that the poster said that he had seen
better SNR results reported by his modem / router when using what he considered to be a
higher quality DC source than the original wall-wart PSU that was supplied with it.
Q: I wonder if it's possible to find and try out a known
very high quality mains-to-<x> V DC alternative unit that is plug compatible with the wall-warts for my DLink DSL-320B-Z1 modems?
1. Would have to be plug-compatible, am not up to doing any physical mods, I'm afraid.
2. What is x? I'd need to look up the specs for the modem. I believe x=9.
3. I can't really test it: Would need firstly (a) a scope to verify the quality of the hardware, and secondly, (b) in order to see the end result, if any, it would be necessary to fire up mydslwebstats or similar and graph the relevant figures from the modem. Since I'm ashamed to say I don't have the resources to do either, I might need help from a volunteer tester?
This unit on amazon
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B004MZQKZI/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_ttl?_encoding=UTF8&colid=1NKM82F39L7B&coliid=IDXP47M9WKZ11says 9 V. And claims high quality, but of course that cannot reasonably be read as meaning high
er quality
output, or higher quality in any other sense than the modem manufacturer’s unit. It just perhaps is meant to claim that it's maybe durable or well-built, has good quality components, or forty things. It mentions conversion efficiency somewhere for example. It might be worth a try, but I'm not willing to bet on it.
Could anyone find a spec for the DSL-320B-Z1’s power supply requirements, incl current budget?
High quality output would have to mean all of (a) a stiff supply, more than adequate current delivery, low internal impedance plus no inductance getting in the way of really fast slew rate, high dI/dt. And also (b) low noise and low ripple. And all still true even under real-case, fast-varying load. Have I forgotten anything?
What might definitely qualify as a known, very high-quality, practical, usable 9 V DC source?
* A battery, we've talked about this before in earlier threads. A bit of a usability nightmare and not plug-compatible unless I could get a lot of help / volunteer with a soldering iron etc.
* Other wall-warts that are simply very high-quality designs? Would be ideal.
* Daft idea: What about laptop PSUs? Not plug-compatible, wrong voltages for all I know, and are they actually higher-quality outputs? Certainly high current, presumably stiff too?
* Anything else I've omitted that could give really high quality output plus practicality / ease of use?
Baseline: In any case, I don't know how good or bad the Dlink-supplied wall-warts are, so I don't know what the baseline is. They will be incredibly cheapo, although I don't know how bad or not cheapness might be. Nor do I know how significant the impact of psu quality is.
Measurement: Another point is that it might only be possible to capture representative measurements of modem stats if using my particular ultra-long line, or one of extreme length just like it, because we want a really weak DSL signal, plus (assumption, guesswork) a relatively quiet line noise environment especially considering the length of line. We are then going to be considering the ratio of a low DSL signal to a possible low PSU-contributed noise source.
Thinking again about the poster’s observation, I also ask myself how an improvement that actually reaches the modem might affect performance? Is there a chance of seeing higher sync rates? A reported SNRM holding up better=higher? Some other result visible with detailed graphing? If there is a change in the quality of DC input seen at some level, how significant might that be in terms of affecting DSL modem performance? If a modem has its own smoothing and filtering, then that might simply block any effect, in which case, good for Dlink.
[ Yet another long post from that Weaver. What
is that guy on? (See attached A4 sheet
) ]