Kitz ADSL Broadband Information
adsl spacer  
Support this site
Home Broadband ISPs Tech Routers Wiki Forum
 
     
   Compare ISP   Rate your ISP
   Glossary   Glossary
 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic: Interleaving applied but no idea why  (Read 7119 times)

MikeZ

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 96
Re: Interleaving applied but no idea why
« Reply #15 on: February 26, 2016, 04:25:17 PM »

It is labeled "Severely ES" and just below ES on the list.  For Remote Viewer/Monitor (v2.0.4).

Thanks - got it now. It wasn't listed at all on the 'Original' graph - I had to switch to 'Standard'.
Logged

tbailey2

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1245
Re: Interleaving applied but no idea why
« Reply #16 on: February 26, 2016, 04:34:25 PM »

It is labeled "Severely ES" and just below ES on the list.  For Remote Viewer/Monitor (v2.0.4).

Thanks - got it now. It wasn't listed at all on the 'Original' graph - I had to switch to 'Standard'.
See:

http://forum.kitz.co.uk/index.php/topic,14361.msg310906.html#msg310906
Logged
Tony
My Books!
Plusnet 80/20 - DSLstats - HG612/TG582n - ECI

NewtronStar

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4898
Re: Interleaving applied but no idea why
« Reply #18 on: February 26, 2016, 10:21:05 PM »

Your on the Speed profile so you would need to be seeing 2880 errored seconds for the DLM to intervene and at most the ES count over 24 hours has been hitting 847 over 5 days and two small spikes of 10 and 11 SES cannot see that would cause the DLM to take action

No forced re-syncs SNRM looked ok until the 25th of feb 14:37 then it increased on the 26th of feb 6:02 anyway I can't see any reason why the DLM applied interleaving   ???
Logged

MikeZ

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 96
Re: Interleaving applied but no idea why
« Reply #19 on: February 26, 2016, 10:29:16 PM »

Your on the Speed profile so you would need to be seeing 2880 errored seconds for the DLM to intervene and at most the ES count over 24 hours has been hitting 847 over 5 days and two small spikes of 10 and 11 SES cannot see that would cause the DLM to take action

No forced re-syncs SNRM looked ok until the 25th of feb 14:37 then it increased on the 26th of feb 6:02 anyway I can't see any reason why the DLM applied interleaving   ???

Thanks - it is rather odd. However, I've only had 13 ES since interleaving was applied so, if it stays this way, maybe it will remove interleaving again within a couple of weeks.
Logged

NewtronStar

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4898
Re: Interleaving applied but no idea why
« Reply #20 on: February 26, 2016, 11:51:26 PM »

Thanks - it is rather odd. However, I've only had 13 ES since interleaving was applied so, if it stays this way, maybe it will remove interleaving again within a couple of weeks.

It's difficult MikeZ but I would ask your ISP which DLM profile your on because I was hit by the change of profile when moving from BT to EE (Speed to Standard non G.INP days) happily hitting 1700 ES per day on speed then standard came in on EE and went Interleaved in 2 days and I think a DLM profile change may also happen when moving from 40/10 to 80/20.
Logged

MikeZ

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 96
Re: Interleaving applied but no idea why
« Reply #21 on: February 27, 2016, 08:57:47 AM »

It's difficult MikeZ but I would ask your ISP which DLM profile your on because I was hit by the change of profile when moving from BT to EE (Speed to Standard non G.INP days) happily hitting 1700 ES per day on speed then standard came in on EE and went Interleaved in 2 days and I think a DLM profile change may also happen when moving from 40/10 to 80/20.

I've asked and I'm still on speed (as it were).

Stats are slightly screwed up today because I've had to revert to the previous version of DSLstats due to 'divide by zero' errors. It appears to have re-uploaded some day-old data - that peak in ES is a red herring.

Anyway, traffic lights are all green now, so we'll see what happens...
Logged

William Grimsley

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1489
    • Newton Poppleford Weather
Re: Interleaving applied but no idea why
« Reply #22 on: February 27, 2016, 09:11:16 AM »

Stats are slightly screwed up today because I've had to revert to the previous version of DSLstats due to 'divide by zero' errors. It appears to have re-uploaded some day-old data - that peak in ES is a red herring.

I never knew MDWS had a data logging facility. It's never uploaded old data for me?
Logged

MikeZ

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 96
Re: Interleaving applied but no idea why
« Reply #23 on: February 27, 2016, 09:27:55 AM »

Stats are slightly screwed up today because I've had to revert to the previous version of DSLstats due to 'divide by zero' errors. It appears to have re-uploaded some day-old data - that peak in ES is a red herring.

I never knew MDWS had a data logging facility. It's never uploaded old data for me?

I restored the AppData/Local/dslstats directory from a backup taken just after midnight yesterday so it has re-uploaded data between midnight yesterday and the time that I started running it again (about 05:30 this morning).
Logged

William Grimsley

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1489
    • Newton Poppleford Weather
Re: Interleaving applied but no idea why
« Reply #24 on: February 27, 2016, 09:30:49 AM »

I restored the AppData/Local/dslstats directory from a backup taken just after midnight yesterday so it has re-uploaded data between midnight yesterday and the time that I started running it again (about 05:30 this morning).

Ok, so MDWS now uploads archive data?
Logged

MikeZ

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 96
Re: Interleaving applied but no idea why
« Reply #25 on: February 27, 2016, 09:47:02 AM »

Ok, so MDWS now uploads archive data?

It was DSLstats that uploaded it due to me restoring an older copy of es.data.
Logged

William Grimsley

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1489
    • Newton Poppleford Weather
Re: Interleaving applied but no idea why
« Reply #26 on: February 27, 2016, 10:05:32 AM »

Ok, so MDWS now uploads archive data?

It was DSLstats that uploaded it due to me restoring an older copy of es.data.

I must be getting confused. So, DSLstats now uploads archive data to MDWS?
Logged

MikeZ

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 96
Re: Interleaving applied but no idea why
« Reply #27 on: February 27, 2016, 10:17:06 AM »

I must be getting confused. So, DSLstats now uploads archive data to MDWS?

DSLstats obviously keeps a record of some data in AppData/Local/dslstats. By restoring an older copy of es.data (which I assume is a database of ES data) I appear to have confused DSLstats into uploading an incorrect ES count. I assume that it compares the ES data from the HG612 with what it has in its database, then uses the two figures to decide what to tell MDWS.

That's just my assumption - the author of DSLstats will be able to explain how it works and what has happened in my case.
Logged

roseway

  • Administrator
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 43613
  • Penguins CAN fly
    • DSLstats
Re: Interleaving applied but no idea why
« Reply #28 on: February 27, 2016, 10:48:18 AM »

What MikeZ says is quite correct. It would have been better not to restore the older copy of es.data.
Logged
  Eric

MikeZ

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 96
Re: Interleaving applied but no idea why
« Reply #29 on: February 27, 2016, 10:50:53 AM »

What MikeZ says is quite correct. It would have been better not to restore the older copy of es.data.

Thanks :) Yes, I should have tried the older version of DSLstats with the current copy before I restored the old one.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3
 

anything