........... or the other more likely option of FTTPoD (on demand), whereby the EU will foot quite a bit of the cost to provide it. We seem to have had a bit of an uptake with this around one rural area on my patch.
If you're replying to me (and the weird availability of FTTP in Cornwall), it all appears to be bog standard FTTP, not on demand. Which would explain why no one actually appears to be connected to the FTTP equipment, and generally multiple poles have it, not just the odd one or two (with the exception I already pointed out).
I know some of the people who live in these situations and BT's various broadband checkers (retail and wholesale) both agree - it's standard FTTP, pay £53 a month plus line rental and you can have 330Mbit Infinity 4 from BT Retail and BT TV and all the trimmings (or lower speeds for less money of course - which FTTPoD does not permit)
That said, there is some curious FTTPoD availability here. Some exchange areas have it (like mine, and has done for years), others don't - FTTC otherwise available of course. I have no idea how BT arrives at that decision. In one example of "FTTP in an FTTC area" I don't think FTTPoD is even available to the FTTC customers
Regarding ROI .................the perceived average time it will take to turn investment into profit on rural FTTC BDUK projects, is expected to be 20-25yrs. Which is why every single other bidder invited to partake .... buggered off quick sharp.
But wouldn't the decision to install the larger cabinets in some places suggest that BT expects high uptake? If BT is so cost-conscious they wouldn't pay more than they need to.
You could also argue that no one can really compete with the behemoth that is Openreach - they have the poles/ducts/cabinets/exchanges/backhaul and they already control everything (and there's nothing to stop them from muscling in, such as BT doing their own FTTP in the B4RN service area, or historically finally deciding to do ADSL where others have rolled out wireless). That's why no one wants to try.
What the ROI would be on FTTP, only those at the top of the food chain in BT will know. If it isn't a viable proposition, they WILL NOT do it, their commitment is to their shareholders first and foremost. Blame Maggie.
But they have done it. Just in the places where the expenditure is high and the ROI is low. That's why it makes no sense, and why BT's protestations of "FTTP is too expensive and impractical" make no sense, considering they've proven that they will do it when they want to