Thank you NS for understanding.
I do all I can to get info out there. I'm also quite dismayed about the g.inp stuff where I was dropping hints, then to get accused of it being rubbish because I couldn't name sources. So I went to a good deal of time & effort to get someone to publicly put their name to it.... and the response, oh that's nothing new. Of course some of it wasn't new because I may have been saying it in a different way, just unable to name names or sources. I feel I can't win, because it isnt easy to get info from BT. The one thing this site has always done is share what info can be shared. This dates way back to the early days and how BT backhauls and VPs work when there was nothing else out there anywhere.
I can also understand how BS feels, (Eric beat me to it), BS shares info here, but there has been a tendency of late for those threads to degenerate into a BT slanging match. Is it any wonder that people give up bothering trying to get info out there. Some people also fail to realise that if I ever printed or shared everything lock stock and barrel then those sources would dry up for good. Thats hardly of benefit to anyone. Keep pestering someone and they will begin to feel its just not worth the effort.
Can people not tell from the tone of BS post that he's also beginning to wonder why he bothers. The convo then moved on to BRAT (info that I got from another source) .. and suddenly because BS and I was having an open convo then it digresses into clandestine info which never was - Ive known about BRAT for years and am currently attempting to get up to date info regarding the new Brandenburg tool for GEA. This was already mentioned in another thread weeks ago, and when I do get something concrete then it will be shared.
As an aside, and although BS hasn't said so, (because we dont have mythical juicy convo's in pte sections), but to me it looks like sarcasm from someone who is fed up of the bitching and sniping... and thats not something I will stand for either.
