Incidentally, my current pbstats, on a 100m line, look like this:
Max: Upstream rate = 32774 Kbps, Downstream rate = 106553 Kbps
Bearer: 0, Upstream rate = 19999 Kbps, Downstream rate = 79999 Kbps
Bearer: 1, Upstream rate = 0 Kbps, Downstream rate = 0 Kbps
VDSL Port Details Upstream Downstream
Attainable Net Data Rate: 32774 kbps 106553 kbps
Actual Aggregate Tx Power: - 7.3 dBm 13.1 dBm
====================================================================================
VDSL Band Status U0 U1 U2 U3 U4 D1 D2 D3
Line Attenuation(dB): 1.9 8.7 11.5 N/A N/A 4.7 10.9 17.4
Signal Attenuation(dB): 1.9 7.8 10.3 N/A N/A 6.3 10.8 17.4
SNR Margin(dB): 15.3 15.2 15.2 N/A N/A 12.5 12.4 12.5
TX Power(dBm): -21.6 -35.1 -7.6 N/A N/A 9.7 8.0 6.9
The upstream TX power is an awful lot lower. Bit loading levels are 3x higher in U2 than in U1 (at 6-7 bits vs 2-3 bits)
I looked back at an old line that was just under 400m, which looked like this:
Max: Upstream rate = 22994 Kbps, Downstream rate = 79732 Kbps
Bearer: 0, Upstream rate = 19999 Kbps, Downstream rate = 79509 Kbps
VDSL Port Details Upstream Downstream
Attainable Net Data Rate: 22994 kbps 79732 kbps
Actual Aggregate Tx Power: 7.1 dBm 13.0 dBm
====================================================================================
VDSL Band Status U0 U1 U2 U3 U4 D1 D2 D3
Line Attenuation(dB): 4.4 22.6 34.0 N/A N/A 11.7 28.4 43.5
Signal Attenuation(dB): 4.4 21.3 32.6 N/A N/A 16.4 28.2 43.4
SNR Margin(dB): 7.3 7.3 7.3 N/A N/A 6.3 6.3 6.3
TX Power(dBm): -1.6 -20.6 6.4 N/A N/A 9.6 7.8 7.0
Isn't it amazing how alike the attenuation values are compared to your line? Yet very different speeds.
The difference would have to be explained by the intrinsic noise level the line encountered. I've attached the QLN graph that the old line was working within.