kitz put it well newt. Your problem with all due respect is very minor compared to what ECI users would be dealing with if it got activated, please remember those of us on ECI cabinets, we cannot simply swap a modem to get it fixed, we are stuck with the dslam.
1500ES a day assuming they not all bunched up together as SES, is unlikely to be service affecting. 1500 is low enough that it doesnt even trigger DLM on the speed profile, and in addition the latency penalty is very significant for those who would be affected.
Also I already said I would be happy keeping fast path (whilst hauwei gets g.inp) I even said it a few dfays ago in one of the threads here. Openreach ultimately are to blame here, they have created a 2 tier service with their obsession of dual vendors. They are clueless enough that they rolled this out without realising they have given out millions of ECI modems that dont work on g.inp. You blaming the wrong people.
You just need to sit tight, g,inp will be turned back on for hauwei users at some point, I think you got used to near 0 errors, that suddenly you think 1500 a day is some kind of crisis, it isnt. Which is why I said openreach should have kept fast path for stable lines, and only used g.inp on unstable lines. That would have significantly limited the damage.
The reports on plusnet forum's I seen arent too good for us ECI users, someone reported latency is reduced with the trial profile, but is still more than fast path and he still has a hit to his sync speed. Openreach seem unwilling to enable fast path again for whatever reason on good lines.
