Kitz ADSL Broadband Information
adsl spacer  
Support this site
Home Broadband ISPs Tech Routers Wiki Forum
 
     
   Compare ISP   Rate your ISP
   Glossary   Glossary
 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: 1 ... 46 47 [48] 49 50 ... 62

Author Topic: G.INP - BT rollout 2015.  (Read 266526 times)

Oldjim

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 242
Re: G.INP - BT rollout 2015.
« Reply #705 on: August 04, 2015, 09:37:54 AM »

Now 4th August and still no G.INP on new cab
Logged
Jim
Plusnet

lcl00

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 96
Re: G.INP - BT rollout 2015.
« Reply #706 on: August 04, 2015, 10:14:23 AM »

Just updating as well.  I'm on an old cabinet, but a new connection... still no G.INP as of 4 August!
Logged

GigabitEthernet

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1918
Re: G.INP - BT rollout 2015.
« Reply #707 on: August 04, 2015, 11:31:57 AM »

From what I understand, you might not get G.INP. It depends on whether DLM decides if you need it.
Logged

Oldjim

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 242
Re: G.INP - BT rollout 2015.
« Reply #708 on: August 04, 2015, 11:35:45 AM »

since my line is presently interleaved I would assume that I do need it
Logged
Jim
Plusnet

GigabitEthernet

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1918
Re: G.INP - BT rollout 2015.
« Reply #709 on: August 04, 2015, 11:38:11 AM »

How many ES and CRCs are you getting with interleaving turned on?
Logged

Oldjim

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 242
Re: G.INP - BT rollout 2015.
« Reply #710 on: August 04, 2015, 11:52:18 AM »

This is from the router stats - uptime is 11 days for a PPPe connection (Plusnet profile change) and 19days since the start (no resync at all)
Logged
Jim
Plusnet

lcl00

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 96
Re: G.INP - BT rollout 2015.
« Reply #711 on: August 04, 2015, 12:35:33 PM »

I also have interleaving applied (on both US and DS), which would indicate that I have a line which would benefit from G.INP.

Any further updates on a completion of the rollout?
Logged

Ixel

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1088
Re: G.INP - BT rollout 2015.
« Reply #712 on: August 05, 2015, 11:16:10 AM »

My connection went down for approximately 1 hour this morning, no fault mentioned on the service status for my area code either. A minute before the internet connection was restored I had a forced re-sync. No sign of any changes to max sync rate or anything else however. Throughout the downtime I had a VDSL2 signal, just nothing beyond that. I'm wondering, could it perhaps be a firmware change/update to the ECI cabinet? If so, perhaps it's one of the steps towards G.INP being supported? Probably not but I'm hopeful :P.
Logged

NewtronStar

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4817
Re: G.INP - BT rollout 2015.
« Reply #713 on: August 05, 2015, 04:56:42 PM »

It's odd Ixel my line had a resync RD1 at 15:23 and again the sync is way to high for my line and the low SNRM of 3.4dB tells me this, it's the second time this has happened since G.INP Mk2 don't know what to make of it  ???

EDIT it looks line my line was down for under 2 hours.
« Last Edit: August 05, 2015, 05:17:27 PM by NewtronStar »
Logged

Enverex

  • Just arrived
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: G.INP - BT rollout 2015.
« Reply #714 on: August 07, 2015, 11:22:32 AM »

Still not seeing G.INP on my line. Should they all be rolled out by this point?

Code: [Select]
xDSL
Mode VDSL2
Traffic Type PTM
Status Up
Link Power State L0
Downstream Upstream
Line Coding (Trellis) On On
SNR Margin (dB) 8.2 6.1
Attenuation (dB) 25.4 0.0
Output Power (dBm) 11.9 6.6
Attainable Rate (Kbps) 29197 4852
Rate (Kbps) 24998 4885
B (# of bytes in Mux Data Frame) 114 143
M (# of Mux Data Frames in an RS codeword) 1 1
T (# of Mux Data Frames in an OH sub-frame) 0 38
R (# of redundancy bytes in the RS codeword) 8 12
S (# of data symbols over which the RS code word spans) 0.1450 0.9341
L (# of bits transmitted in each data symbol) 6784 1336
D (interleaver depth) 4 1
I (interleaver block size in bytes) 123 78
N (RS codeword size) 123 156
Delay (msec) 0 0
INP (DMT symbol) 51.00 0.00
OH Frames 0 0
OH Frame Errors 0 363
RS Words 3747157272 3784687
RS Correctable Errors 2919023 4735
RS Uncorrectable Errors 0 0
HEC Errors 0 0
OCD Errors 0 0
LCD Errors 0 0
Total Cells 1188700652 0
Data Cells 337508933 0
Bit Errors 0 0
Total ES 0 303
Total SES 0 0
Total UAS 25 25

Also, I'm currently using a Billion 8800NL and I swear it's worse than my old 620 for sync speeds. Does anyone know what is arguably the best VDSL modem money can buy and why?
Logged

KIAB

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 198
Re: G.INP - BT rollout 2015.
« Reply #715 on: August 07, 2015, 02:31:13 PM »

Been a bit sloppy with firmware on my 8800NL, been about a year since it was last updated  :-[
Updated this morning to version 2.32e,  speed has jumped up another 4Mb :), & it seems more responsive,probabably won't last though.
Logged

NewtronStar

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4817
Re: G.INP - BT rollout 2015.
« Reply #716 on: August 07, 2015, 05:31:46 PM »

Still not seeing G.INP on my line. Should they all be rolled out by this point?

I (interleaver depth)   4   1

INP (DMT symbol)   51.00   0.00

When looking at you INP it's showing 51.00 downstream and 0.00 UP that looks like a G.INP Mk2 activated line to me  ;)
Logged

Enverex

  • Just arrived
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: G.INP - BT rollout 2015.
« Reply #717 on: August 07, 2015, 09:12:00 PM »

Shouldn't there also be a delay listed if that's true?

Also my speed has dropped lately rather than increased and my pings haven't decreased... so if G.INP has really been activated then I'm severely disappointed. :(
Logged

NewtronStar

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4817
Re: G.INP - BT rollout 2015.
« Reply #718 on: August 07, 2015, 09:26:23 PM »

Shouldn't there also be a delay listed if that's true?

Also my speed has dropped lately rather than increased and my pings haven't decreased... so if G.INP has really been activated then I'm severely disappointed. :(

Yes there is a delay on you stats and it as shows Delay: 0 DS 0 US the same as most G.INP lines.
or fastpath line.

Now when i look at your SNRM you have got 2dB spare but for some reason your DS sync is capped you should have +5000 kbps extra on your current sync.

Thats why you have seen no increase in download sync.
« Last Edit: August 07, 2015, 09:49:32 PM by NewtronStar »
Logged

Enverex

  • Just arrived
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: G.INP - BT rollout 2015.
« Reply #719 on: August 07, 2015, 10:11:15 PM »

It's always been like that, it's actually gotten worse since G.INP was implemented. Potential sync was normally around 31Mb and my real sync was always around 26Mb. Then a good while ago my actual sync got stuck at exactly 20Mb (20000 on the dot) as if it was being artificially limited. After a few months it finally fixed itself but I've never exceeded 24999Kb (2.67MB/s actual download speed) since then. It's really annoying.

You mentioned fastpath. This line is heavily interleaved (or at least it used to be), does G.INP have its own fastpath/interleaving vs the normal part of the line or are you saying that this line doesn't appear to be interleaved at all anymore?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 46 47 [48] 49 50 ... 62
 

anything