I dont think so b*cat - unless I'm missing something?
The cabs were done at
Stage One which was a separate process than Stage Two which is when the DLM profiles were applied to the individual lines.
As mentioned in my post
here. I would expect the cab to have had its f/w updated before any lines went live.
There is no reason why the f/w upgrade to the cab wont have gone ahead, and it was only the DLM profiles on a line basis that was suspended. The issue with the rollout was the DLM profiles on the individual lines and it was this that the fix addresses by making the default profile for upstream available "Upstream, Error Protection Off".
This same
upstream profile is also used for lines pre-G.INP, but you can tell the difference by looking at the downstream profile too.
So the default profile for a line which
is Pre G.INP will say:
Profile Name 0.128M-80M Downstream, Error Protection Off - 0.128M-20M Upstream, Error Protection Off
The default profile for a line which was been
MKI G.INP will be something like:
Profile Name 0.128M-80M Downstream, Retransmission Low - 0.128M-20M Upstream, Retransmission Low
But a line which is
MKII G.INP should say something like:
Profile Name 0.128M-80M Downstream, Retransmission Low - 0.128M-20M Upstream, Error Protection Off
Confusion could occur at a later stage if and when its had retransmission applied and DLM decides it needs more protection, then it could say something like Interleaving in there too and it wont be quite so easy to spot.