Kitz ADSL Broadband Information
adsl spacer  
Support this site
Home Broadband ISPs Tech Routers Wiki Forum
 
     
   Compare ISP   Rate your ISP
   Glossary   Glossary
 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 20

Author Topic: G.INP enabled Stats Comparison  (Read 100433 times)

loonylion

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 723
Re: G.INP enabled Stats Comparison
« Reply #15 on: March 18, 2015, 01:34:12 PM »

There may be something to be gleaned from vdslCfgFlagsValue:      00210400 but not sure!

Code: [Select]
G.INP feature bit

Bit 17 xdslAuxFeaturesMask—ON

Bit 17 xdslAuxFeaturesValue—ON

xdslAuxFeaturesMask—00040003

xdslAuxFeaturesValue—00040003

Bit 17 xdslAuxFeaturesMask—OFF

Bit 17 xdslAuxFeaturesValue—OFF

xdslAuxFeaturesMask—00060003

xdslAuxFeaturesValue—00060003


GinpUs support

Bits 18 kDslGinpUsSupported—OFF

xdslAuxFeaturesValue—00024003

Bits 18 kDslGinpUsSupported—ON

xdslAuxFeaturesValue—00064003


FireDS support

Bits 22 kDslFireDsSupported—OFF

adslDemodCap2Value—00900000

Bits 22 kDslFireDsSupported—ON

adslDemodCap2Value—00d00000


FireUS support

Bits 23 kDslFireUsSupported—Off

adslDemodCap2Value—00500000

Bits 23 kDslFireUsSupported—On

adslDemodCap2Value—00d00000

extract from Cisco documentation at http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/access/800/firmware/release/notes/VDSL2/fwrn35l.html
Logged

Ixel

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1282
Re: G.INP enabled Stats Comparison
« Reply #16 on: March 18, 2015, 01:40:03 PM »

Has anyone on an ECI cabinet had G.INP yet or is it just Huawei cabs?
Logged

loonylion

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 723
Re: G.INP enabled Stats Comparison
« Reply #17 on: March 18, 2015, 01:59:39 PM »

Has anyone on an ECI cabinet had G.INP yet or is it just Huawei cabs?

Just Huawei so far.
Logged

Ixel

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1282
Re: G.INP enabled Stats Comparison
« Reply #18 on: March 18, 2015, 04:51:31 PM »

Damn. I hope they're including ECI in their rollout, oh well, time will tell. Thanks.
Logged

Chrysalis

  • Content Team
  • Addicted Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 7440
  • AAISP CF
Re: G.INP enabled Stats Comparison
« Reply #19 on: March 18, 2015, 05:57:14 PM »

I am going to fire of an email to the openreach CEO to see what he says about the ECI situation.

We have one plusnet staff member who says ECI has been included in vectoring testing (g.inp needed for vectoring), andyh who I dont know who he is but he knows too much for a customer.

We also have BS who we know works for openreach and is well placed and he says he hasnt seen any ECI activity, I give him the most credibility.

I dont know why BT always go dual vendors, as one vendor always end up been worse than the other.
Logged

NewtronStar

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4898
Re: G.INP enabled Stats Comparison
« Reply #20 on: March 18, 2015, 06:46:35 PM »

Theres quite alot of G.INP users over the last two days and Roseway got his yesterday at 11:36am  :) I am using the Huawei cab and still waiting for G.INP, i'll be the last FTTC user to get it  :lol:
Logged

Chrysalis

  • Content Team
  • Addicted Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 7440
  • AAISP CF
Re: G.INP enabled Stats Comparison
« Reply #21 on: March 18, 2015, 07:02:16 PM »

no you will get it whilst no ECI have it. :p

G.INP so far seems an all win for those who have it.
Logged

Hitman

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 88
Re: G.INP enabled Stats Comparison
« Reply #22 on: March 18, 2015, 10:01:07 PM »


G.INP so far seems an all win for those who have it.

Not so great for me at the moment due to ongoing repairs and investigations to find a cause of half BB DS, G.inp was added to try to aid my line alas not, no real change yet  ???

That said, it does look promising to those with a decent line.
Logged

NewtronStar

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4898
Re: G.INP enabled Stats Comparison
« Reply #23 on: March 18, 2015, 10:21:14 PM »

That said, it does look promising to those with a decent line.

Well you see your line has two parts Internal and External if you make sure the internal part is 100% then you can say the external part is faulty but there could be other variable's
Logged

Hitman

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 88
Re: G.INP enabled Stats Comparison
« Reply #24 on: March 18, 2015, 10:50:06 PM »

The internal (If you mean the Exchange/Cab etc..) hardware has been upgraded/replaced/different port and 1 repair to the property (4 pair) cable 10ft from my house, just an ongoing process of elimination, my modem is next to the NT5 which has also just been upgraded today to a HH5 as part of the ongoing process BT is working on, I think the HH5 addition is the last "hardware" fix they can try.
Logged

Bigmac77

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 33
Re: G.INP enabled Stats Comparison
« Reply #25 on: March 19, 2015, 09:06:52 PM »

I have two lines both running from the same Huawei cabinet, both are running on unlocked HG612's and both of these are using software version V100R001C01B030SP06, however this morning one line was G.INP enabled the other was not and still isn't. Prior to yesterday both lines were running at a similar speed and produced a similar number of FEC's around a million or so per day. In the last 14 hours the G.INP enabled line had recorded just 9500 FEC's and no other errors the other line is still clocking up errors at it's usual rate.
« Last Edit: March 19, 2015, 09:12:19 PM by Bigmac77 »
Logged

boost

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 768
Re: G.INP enabled Stats Comparison
« Reply #26 on: March 19, 2015, 09:22:04 PM »

Interesting!
Logged

NewtronStar

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4898
Re: G.INP enabled Stats Comparison
« Reply #27 on: March 19, 2015, 09:44:12 PM »

I have two lines both running from the same Huawei cabinet, both are running on unlocked HG612's and both of these are using software version V100R001C01B030SP06

Are both using the exact same firmware V100R001C01B030SP06 comes in two flavours ?

1. unlockedgui
2. unlockedgui-nobtagent

the first one still updates to V100R001C01B030SP08 the second one will not update to V100R001C01B030SP08

« Last Edit: March 19, 2015, 09:47:29 PM by NewtronStar »
Logged

Bigmac77

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 33
Re: G.INP enabled Stats Comparison
« Reply #28 on: March 19, 2015, 10:20:17 PM »

Are both using the exact same firmware V100R001C01B030SP06 comes in two flavours ?

1. unlockedgui
2. unlockedgui-nobtagent

the first one still updates to V100R001C01B030SP08 the second one will not update to V100R001C01B030SP08

Both are running the same version, unlockedgui.
Logged

Bald_Eagle1

  • Helpful
  • Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 2721
Re: G.INP enabled Stats Comparison
« Reply #29 on: March 19, 2015, 10:21:19 PM »

In the last 14 hours the G.INP enabled line had recorded just 9500 FEC's and no other errors the other line is still clocking up errors at it's usual rate.


Have you had chance to study the new Bearer 1 G.INP data yet, along with what has now moved from being recorded against Bearer 0 to being recorded against Bearer 1.

Also the new data that isn't specifically allocated to Bearer 0 or Bearer 1?

Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 20
 

anything