Kitz ADSL Broadband Information
adsl spacer  
Support this site
Home Broadband ISPs Tech Routers Wiki Forum
 
     
   Compare ISP   Rate your ISP
   Glossary   Glossary
 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: [1] 2 3

Author Topic: on fast path feels like interleaved  (Read 59556 times)

usermac

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 44
on fast path feels like interleaved
« on: February 15, 2015, 10:34:02 PM »

I am connected directly to to the exchange spitting distance, I play online games and found out that if you remove interleaved your ping will be reduced. So I did this and cool it worked my ping was 10-15ms max. But now it feels like I am back on interleaved again it is so frustrating,I tried to explain this on the bt community forums but the same guys come back and say yeah this is normal there every time. There is no telling them that something does not feel right with my connection. 
Tracing route to 185.16.86.18 over a maximum of 30 hops

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  BThomehub.home [192.168.1.254]
  2     9 ms     9 ms     8 ms  213.1.174.250
  3     8 ms     8 ms     8 ms  213.1.175.145
  4    17 ms    17 ms    16 ms  213.1.69.122
  5    21 ms    20 ms    20 ms  217.41.169.219
  6    22 ms    23 ms    22 ms  217.41.169.109
  7    23 ms    50 ms    22 ms  acc2-xe-7-2-0.sf.21cn-ipp.bt.net [109.159.251.23
3]
  8    32 ms    31 ms    29 ms  core2-te-0-13-0-10.ealing.ukcore.bt.net [109.159
.251.179]
  9    28 ms    28 ms    28 ms  peer3-te0-7-0-0.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net [62.172.
102.5]
 10    29 ms    29 ms    29 ms  xe-0-2-4.rt0.thn.bandwidth.co.uk [195.66.225.123
]
 11    29 ms    30 ms    28 ms  xe-1-1-2.rt0.cr.bandwidth.co.uk [5.226.136.42]
 12    31 ms    33 ms    31 ms  10ge-xe-0-1-1.ldn.uk.fragnet.net [217.146.92.6]

 13    30 ms    30 ms    30 ms  185.16.86.18

Trace complete.

C:\Users\Ian>
Logged

usermac

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 44
Re: on fast path feels like interleaved
« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2015, 10:39:00 PM »

3. Firmware version:   Software version 4.7.5.1.83.8.130.1.17 (Type A) Last updated 04/05/14
4. Board version:   BT Hub 4A
5. ADSL uptime:   3 days, 12:05:04
6. Bandwidth:   448 / 8128
7. Data sent/received:   746.7 MB / 790.8 MB
8. Broadband username:   bthomehub@btbroadband.com
9. BT FON:   Yes
10. 2.4 GHz Wireless network/SSID:   BTHub4-ZN23
11. 2.4 GHz Wireless connections:   Enabled (802.11 b/g/n (Recommended)) 20 MHz, WPS disabled
12. 2.4 GHz Wireless security:   WPA and WPA2
13. 2.4 GHz Wireless channel:   6
14. 5 GHz Wireless network/SSID:   BTHub4-5GHZ
15. 5 GHz Wireless connections:   Enabled (802.11 n 40 MHz (Recommended)) 20/40 MHz, WPS disabled
16. 5 GHz Wireless security:   WPA2
17. 5 GHz Wireless channel:   36
18. Firewall:   Default
19. MAC Address:   cc:33:bb:ac:ae:ec
20. VPI/VCI:   0 / 38
21. Modulation:   G.992.1 Annex A
22. Latency type:   Fast
23. Software variant:   -
24. Boot loader:   -
DSL noise margin: 29.00 dB upstream, 10.60 dB downstream
Logged

tommy45

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 627
Re: on fast path feels like interleaved
« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2015, 10:43:06 PM »

If wired no not normal , BT retails peering /routing is the reason , only solution is to change isp if 30ms is spoiling your online gaming experience
Logged

usermac

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 44
Re: on fast path feels like interleaved
« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2015, 10:51:15 PM »

This is on Ethernet connection speed 1.0Gbps. Lol I do not think I will change isp as much as I would like to some day's. It is just annoying that they take a percentage off your download to be on the fast path. And fast path feels the same as interleaved did. It definitely is not spoiling anything it is just the principle it used to be better that's all.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2015, 11:08:17 PM by usermac »
Logged

kitz

  • Administrator
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 33881
  • Trinity: Most guys do.
    • http://www.kitz.co.uk
Re: on fast path feels like interleaved
« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2015, 12:28:54 AM »

From the latency it sure looks like its interleaved. - 29ms across the core network is too high unless youre way up in the Scottish Isles.
Where abouts in the UK are you?   This makes a difference to early stage latency as the further from London you are then the higher it will be.


Im up in North West Lancs and I can reach London in 12ms

Code: [Select]
Tracing route to 185.16.86.18 over a maximum of 30 hops

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.1.1
  2    12 ms    13 ms    12 ms  lo0.12.central12.pcl-bng02.plus.net [195.166.130.153]
  3    12 ms    12 ms    12 ms  irb.12.pcl-cr02.plus.net [84.93.249.114]
  4    12 ms    12 ms    12 ms  ae2.pcl-cr01.plus.net [195.166.129.6]
  5    12 ms    13 ms    12 ms  ae1.ptw-cr01.plus.net [195.166.129.0]
  6    13 ms    13 ms    12 ms  xe-0-2-4.rt0.thn.bandwidth.co.uk [195.66.225.123]
  7    13 ms    13 ms    13 ms  xe-1-1-2.rt0.cr.bandwidth.co.uk [5.226.136.42]
  8    13 ms    13 ms    12 ms  10ge-xe-0-1-1.ldn.uk.fragnet.net [217.146.92.6]
  9    12 ms    12 ms    12 ms  185.16.86.18

Trace complete.

In fact I can go all the way down to London, back up the BTcore and reach your [exchange] backhaul router in 15ms. 

Code: [Select]
Tracing route to 213.1.175.250 over a maximum of 30 hops

  1     1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.1.1
  2    12 ms    12 ms    12 ms  lo0.12.central12.pcl-bng02.plus.net [195.166.130.153]
  3    12 ms    12 ms    12 ms  irb.12.pcl-cr01.plus.net [84.93.249.113]
  4    13 ms    12 ms    13 ms  195.99.126.96
  5    13 ms    13 ms    13 ms  core3-te-0-0-0-18.faraday.ukcore.bt.net [109.159.249.41]
  6    19 ms    15 ms    15 ms  host213-121-193-44.ukcore.bt.net [213.121.193.44]
  7    15 ms    14 ms    14 ms  core2-pos1-2.reading.ukcore.bt.net [62.6.201.206]
  8    15 ms    14 ms    15 ms  62.6.198.40
  9    15 ms    15 ms    15 ms  213.1.175.250

Trace complete.

I'm reverse traversing your core routing via your RAS in 3ms.  The same portion trip is taking you one heck of a lot longer.

Quote
It is just annoying that they take a percentage off your download to be on the fast path.

Im afraid thats not true.  Its interleaving that eats into a portion of your sync speed.
However I note from your sync speed that you are on adsl1 for which the max speed is 8128 and your router is reporting Fast path, so I guess it must be very poor routing and not interleaving.  Even so I find it odd that I can still traverse the same part of the core network and your backhaul quicker than you can.    Is it your router, or is anything else using your connection?
Logged
Please do not PM me with queries for broadband help as I may not be able to respond.
-----
How to get your router line stats :: ADSL Exchange Checker

usermac

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 44
Re: on fast path feels like interleaved
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2015, 09:54:42 AM »

I am from Winchester Hampshire. I am using the Home hub 4 and I have nothing else using my network.
Logged

kitz

  • Administrator
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 33881
  • Trinity: Most guys do.
    • http://www.kitz.co.uk
Re: on fast path feels like interleaved
« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2015, 10:37:58 AM »

>> Winchester Hampshire.

So In theory your latency to london should be fairly low, although you wont be on the core network for long.  Your latency time for hop 2&3 is possible as that depends upon the length of your exchange backhaul before it joins the core.   You seem to be hopping around at the RAS a bit and then why it should take so long to get on the core Ive no idea.   There shouldn't ever be issues on the core.

I'm afraid this one has me scratching my head.   Do you have another router you can try, I seem to recall something years ago about one of the HH's causing latency issues.   I've just had a quick search but couldnt find the one I was thinking of.  I did come across a couple of posts that recommended turning off UPnP in the HH which may be worth a try to see if it makes any difference.
Logged
Please do not PM me with queries for broadband help as I may not be able to respond.
-----
How to get your router line stats :: ADSL Exchange Checker

boost

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 768
Re: on fast path feels like interleaved
« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2015, 11:02:31 AM »

Quote
9. BT FON:   Yes

:D

If you ignore that then there is a clear doubling of ping between hop 3 and 4 which gains another 10ms at hop 8.
Kinda looks like BT 'routing' like someone else suggested already?
Logged

usermac

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 44
Re: on fast path feels like interleaved
« Reply #8 on: February 16, 2015, 11:28:50 AM »

Also I in the troubleshooting list on the hub I have a lot of In Block Remote admin constantly going on so many pages.
   

IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 61.234.146.22:5145-​>86.131.174.191:22 on ppp0)
13:51:20, 15 Feb.   (529607.490000) NTP synchronization success!
13:38:11, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (ICMP type 8 code 0 198.20.99.130-​>86.131.174.191 on ppp0)
13:24:14, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 222.186.59.100:6000-​>86.131.174.191:22 on ppp0)
13:21:13, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 188.138.17.205:9107-​>86.131.174.191:8080 on ppp0)
13:15:40, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 184.105.247.228:54099-​>86.131.174.191:443 on ppp0)
12:49:24, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 118.165.134.33:12200-​>86.131.174.191:8080 on ppp0)
12:49:12, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 118.165.134.33:12200-​>86.131.174.191:443 on ppp0)
12:35:41, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 5.196.105.72:39934-​>86.131.174.191:80 on ppp0)
12:14:35, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 218.59.238.92:12200-​>86.131.174.191:8080 on ppp0)
11:56:12, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 122.228.207.190:54987-​>86.131.174.191:22 on ppp0)
10:48:48, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 198.20.69.74:17535-​>86.131.174.191:443 on ppp0)
10:45:12, 15 Feb.   (518440.000000) CWMP: session completed successfully
10:45:09, 15 Feb.   (518436.830000) CWMP: HTTP authentication success from https://pbthdm.bt.mo
10:45:01, 15 Feb.   (518428.400000) CWMP: Server URL: https://pbthdm.bt.mo; Connecting as user: ACS username
10:45:01, 15 Feb.   (518428.400000) CWMP: Session start now. Event code(s): '2 PERIODIC,4 VALUE CHANGE'
10:45:00, 15 Feb.   (518428.010000) CWMP: Initializing transaction for event code 2 PERIODIC
10:31:23, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 218.77.79.43:55428-​>86.131.174.191:22 on ppp0)
09:12:32, 15 Feb.   (512879.840000) Admin login successful by 192.168.1.66 on HTTP
09:11:45, 15 Feb.   BLOCKED 1 more packets (because of Spoofing protection)
09:11:45, 15 Feb.   (512832.300000) Lease for IP 192.168.1.66 renewed by host Usermac (MAC c8:60:00:c9:68:16). Lease duration: 1440 min
09:11:45, 15 Feb.   (512832.300000) Device connected: Hostname: Usermac IP: 192.168.1.66 MAC: c8:60:00:c9:68:16 Lease time: 1440 min. Link rate: 1000.0 Mbps
09:11:44, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [12] Spoofing protection (IGMP 86.131.174.191-​>224.0.0.22 on ppp0)
09:11:44, 15 Feb.   BLOCKED 1 more packets (because of Spoofing protection)
09:11:44, 15 Feb.   (512832.230000) Lease requested
09:11:42, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [12] Spoofing protection (IGMP 86.131.174.191-​>224.0.0.22 on ppp0)
09:11:42, 15 Feb.   BLOCKED 1 more packets (because of Spoofing protection)
09:11:42, 15 Feb.   (512830.120000) Wire Lan Port 4 up
09:11:41, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [12] Spoofing protection (IGMP 86.131.174.191-​>224.0.0.22 on ppp0)
09:11:39, 15 Feb.   (512827.120000) Wire Lan Port 4 down
09:11:18, 15 Feb.   (512806.120000) Wire Lan Port 4 up
09:01:12, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 201.150.36.119:59148-​>86.131.174.191:80 on ppp0)
08:02:28, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 192.151.147.210:44814-​>86.131.174.191:80 on ppp0)
07:09:05, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (UDP 184.105.139.67:36352-​>86.131.174.191:161 on ppp0)
06:57:33, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 45.56.114.75:53200-​>86.131.174.191:80 on ppp0)
06:51:12, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 80.82.64.116:58389-​>86.131.174.191:8080 on ppp0)
06:17:42, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 209.134.71.177:39063-​>86.131.174.191:80 on ppp0)
06:17:36, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 209.134.71.177:56923-​>86.131.174.191:8080 on ppp0)
06:12:02, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 61.240.144.64:60000-​>86.131.174.191:161 on ppp0)
05:35:57, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (UDP 192.210.198.194:39984-​>86.131.174.191:161 on ppp0)
04:47:03, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 103.41.124.60:9090-​>86.131.174.191:22 on ppp0)
04:34:37, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (ICMP type 8 code 0 211.140.101.66-​>86.131.174.191 on ppp0)
04:30:50, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 89.248.162.131:57364-​>86.131.174.191:443 on ppp0)
04:15:02, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 61.240.144.66:60000-​>86.131.174.191:80 on ppp0)
03:20:54, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 222.186.21.70:77-​>86.131.174.191:8080 on ppp0)
03:19:32, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 222.186.21.70:77-​>86.131.174.191:80 on ppp0)
03:15:45, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 218.200.104.40:55221-​>86.131.174.191:22 on ppp0)
03:13:32, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 1.169.90.145:12200-​>86.131.174.191:80 on ppp0)
02:19:02, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 61.160.224.128:58981-​>86.131.174.191:22 on ppp0)
02:02:03, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 45.56.114.75:34669-​>86.131.174.191:22 on ppp0)
01:42:02, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (UDP 93.180.5.26:33445-​>86.131.174.191:161 on ppp0)
01:30:40, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 141.212.122.28:45275-​>86.131.174.191:22 on ppp0)
01:02:20, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 80.82.64.116:40383-​>86.131.174.191:8080 on ppp0)
00:56:45, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 104.192.0.20:40667-​>86.131.174.191:80 on ppp0)
00:44:27, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 37.247.36.82:11436-​>86.131.174.191:443 on ppp0)
00:16:32, 15 Feb.   BLOCKED 1 more packets (because of Spoofing protection)
00:16:30, 15 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [12] Spoofing protection (IGMP 86.131.174.191-​>224.0.0.22 on ppp0)
00:13:45, 15 Feb.   (480553.130000) Device disconnected: Hostname: Usermac IP: 192.168.1.66 MAC: c8:60:00:c9:68:16
00:13:45, 15 Feb.   (480553.130000) Wire Lan Port 4 down
00:07:34, 15 Feb.   (480181.410000) Admin login successful by 192.168.1.66 on HTTP
23:32:08, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 62.210.140.186:39257-​>86.131.174.191:22 on ppp0)
23:15:48, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 218.77.79.43:36134-​>86.131.174.191:8080 on ppp0)
23:01:31, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 1.163.69.130:12200-​>86.131.174.191:80 on ppp0)
22:45:48, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (UDP 134.147.203.115:28220-​>86.131.174.191:161 on ppp0)
22:45:35, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 188.138.17.205:50601-​>86.131.174.191:80 on ppp0)
22:35:44, 14 Feb.   (474671.590000) Admin login successful by 192.168.1.66 on HTTP
22:08:02, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 61.160.224.128:58919-​>86.131.174.191:80 on ppp0)
22:02:36, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 218.77.79.43:33288-​>86.131.174.191:443 on ppp0)
21:43:15, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 198.58.75.132:1983-​>86.131.174.191:80 on ppp0)
21:07:04, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 182.254.132.201:55973-​>86.131.174.191:8080 on ppp0)
20:56:11, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 218.59.238.92:12200-​>86.131.174.191:8080 on ppp0)
20:53:17, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 183.136.214.95:6000-​>86.131.174.191:8080 on ppp0)
20:27:54, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 182.151.214.219:49332-​>86.131.174.191:8080 on ppp0)
20:27:53, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 182.151.214.219:51935-​>86.131.174.191:80 on ppp0)
20:21:47, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 218.77.79.43:46685-​>86.131.174.191:80 on ppp0)
20:11:56, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 61.160.224.128:56450-​>86.131.174.191:443 on ppp0)
20:07:10, 14 Feb.   (465758.120000) Admin login successful by 192.168.1.66 on HTTP
18:57:28, 14 Feb.   BLOCKED 1 more packets (because of Remote administration)
18:57:27, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 72.9.158.62:52109-​>86.131.174.191:22 on ppp0)
18:46:46, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 70.183.205.28:40571-​>86.131.174.191:8080 on ppp0)
18:10:00, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 115.231.218.147:9091-​>86.131.174.191:22 on ppp0)
18:05:37, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 198.84.222.208:55111-​>86.131.174.191:80 on ppp0)
18:05:32, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 198.84.222.208:35468-​>86.131.174.191:8080 on ppp0)
17:29:33, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 62.4.9.165:48212-​>86.131.174.191:22 on ppp0)
16:15:04, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 77.88.123.53:298-​>86.131.174.191:22 on ppp0)
16:13:56, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 122.228.207.190:34817-​>86.131.174.191:22 on ppp0)
16:02:56, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 80.82.64.116:46255-​>86.131.174.191:8080 on ppp0)
15:40:56, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 61.160.224.129:59039-​>86.131.174.191:8080 on ppp0)
15:36:40, 14 Feb.   (449527.720000) Admin login successful by 192.168.1.66 on HTTP
15:15:07, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 122.228.207.77:42659-​>86.131.174.191:22 on ppp0)
14:35:28, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 46.165.220.215:43717-​>86.131.174.191:22 on ppp0)
14:25:54, 14 Feb.   (445281.590000) Admin login successful by 192.168.1.66 on HTTP
14:06:48, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 204.151.197.45:17834-​>86.131.174.191:22 on ppp0)
13:52:40, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 45.56.96.33:58327-​>86.131.174.191:443 on ppp0)
13:52:18, 14 Feb.   (443265.340000) Admin login successful by 192.168.1.66 on HTTP
13:52:13, 14 Feb.   (443261.030000) New GUI session from IP 192.168.1.66
13:33:24, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 182.254.139.99:39359-​>86.131.174.191:8080 on ppp0)
13:32:45, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 61.240.144.65:60000-​>86.131.174.191:22 on ppp0)
13:31:02, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 211.90.1.201:57654-​>86.131.174.191:22 on ppp0)
13:14:51, 14 Feb.   IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 115.231.218.23:9091-​>86.131.174.191:22 on ppp0)
Logged

d2d4j

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1103
Re: on fast path feels like interleaved
« Reply #9 on: February 16, 2015, 11:59:41 AM »

Hi

I would not worry too much over those attempted logins as the service is disable on external connection.

Also, a quick glance over the offending IP addresses, most are from bots.

Lastly, you are not under heavy attack, I would say it is extremely light but I would advise you check which ports you have open and for which service, stopping those services if not needed is better.

Finally, if playing games online, most game servers take into account latency and try to equal it out for all players, unless your trying the lightswitch cheat.

I hope that helps a little

Many thanks

John
Logged

usermac

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 44
Re: on fast path feels like interleaved
« Reply #10 on: February 16, 2015, 12:10:22 PM »

Something strange going on increased ping,Bots and poor peering. I think I have a bad Router. Its HH4 TYPE A. I think I am going to either arrange for a replacement or find a non bt one.
Logged

d2d4j

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1103
Re: on fast path feels like interleaved
« Reply #11 on: February 16, 2015, 12:22:52 PM »

Hi

Personally I do not see your issue sorry.

I noted no tested to your destination ip, so I did a quick check as below.

We are on FTTC 80/20 and our results are similar to yours. I'm confident if other try same ping, they may well receive similar results, which there are many reasons why this may happen.

I could be entirely wrong with above, so I apologise in advance.

The bots hot everyone, if you have an external connection, you will be hit. Your degree of attack looks very minor to me, but then I'm comparing against our datacentre, but a quick look over our external attacks on our IP's here, still show your not on a high attack.

I hope that helps a little and as I said, I'm sorry if I'm wrong

Many thanks

John

--- Nice Trace to 185.16.86.18 ---

1) btbusinesshub.home (192.168.1.254) 3.624 ms, 24/24 ps, 0.0% loss
2) host81-139-192-1.in-addr.btopenworld.com (81.139.192.1) 18.948 ms, 24/24 ps, 0.0% loss [AS 2856] United Kingdom
3) 213.120.182.141 (213.120.182.141) 19.390 ms, 24/24 ps, 0.0% loss [AS 2856] United Kingdom
4) 213.120.161.82 (213.120.161.82) 19.750 ms, 24/24 ps, 0.0% loss [AS 2856] United Kingdom
5) 31.55.164.79 (31.55.164.79) 19.241 ms, 24/24 ps, 0.0% loss [AS 2856] United Kingdom
6) 31.55.164.107 (31.55.164.107) 18.674 ms, 24/24 ps, 0.0% loss [AS 2856] United Kingdom
7) acc1-10gige-0-3-0-7.bm.21cn-ipp.bt.net (109.159.248.118) 19.314 ms, 24/24 ps, 0.0% loss [AS 2856] United Kingdom
8) 109.159.248.180 (109.159.248.180) 23.880 ms, 24/24 ps, 0.0% loss [AS 2856] United Kingdom
9) peer5-te0-9-0-11.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net (109.159.252.47) 23.791 ms, 23/23 ps, 0.0% loss [AS 2856] United Kingdom
10) xe-0-2-4.rt0.thn.bandwidth.co.uk (195.66.225.123) 28.058 ms, 23/23 ps, 0.0% loss United Kingdom
11) xe-1-1-2.rt0.cr.bandwidth.co.uk (5.226.136.42) 25.993 ms, 23/23 ps, 0.0% loss [AS 25369] United Kingdom
12) 10ge-xe-0-1-1.ldn.uk.fragnet.net (217.146.92.6) 25.243 ms, 23/23 ps, 0.0% loss [AS 25369] United Kingdom
13) 185.16.86.18 (185.16.86.18) 24.301 ms, 23/23 ps, 0.0% loss [AS 25369] Sweden
Logged

usermac

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 44
Re: on fast path feels like interleaved
« Reply #12 on: February 16, 2015, 12:43:37 PM »

If I am right FTTC does not allow you to be on fast path so the fact are pings are similar makes me think the interleaved is on but some how it is not reporting it. 
Logged

c6em

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 504
Re: on fast path feels like interleaved
« Reply #13 on: February 16, 2015, 12:50:26 PM »

Under FTTC whether you are on fast path or interleaved is controlled entirely by the DLM system.  It may swtich you back and fro.
with FTTC neither you nor your ISP has any control over interleaving status and unlike plain ADSL it cannot be switched either on or off by the ISP.
Logged

d2d4j

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1103
Re: on fast path feels like interleaved
« Reply #14 on: February 16, 2015, 02:03:04 PM »

Hi

Sorry I should have stated my tests were from my mobile over wifi.

Have you tried pinging directly from your home hub. I think you might find it is approx 5ms quicker, but would be interesting to know. The same ping from here is approx 19ms at home hub.

I also tried from our datacentre, to find out if there were any delays, and it was steady at 1ms.

Many thanks

John
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3
 

anything