I think I understand what les is asking for. In view of the fact that we now know for sure that DLM monitors ES and SES and that it uses the daily total midnight to midnight. I can understand why some people may want them.

The one thought that occurs though.. When you ask HG612 stats to run graph PD, how would it affect daily totals if some time slots were missing. I cant think how to explain what I mean.. but when it calculates a day, does it use the last 1440 plots, rather than 0:00 to 23:59.

Yes, it does use the last 1440 samples, on the assumption that logging is running 24/7.

That can be misleading if logging only runs for a short while each day though.

e.g. If logging runs for exactly 6 hours each day, a 1 day plot would display all the latest 1440 samples, inserting gaps for the periods where logging wasn't running (see attached example).

The DS ES graph counts up all the delta values for the number of samples plotted & reports averages per minute, hour, day.

However, this data gives incorrect (too high) daily averages for 6 hours per day logging as it has only used a period from 18:00 to 23:59 each day (noisy periods).

The raw

**modem_stats.log** does store cumulative values AND delta values for each sample, so I suppose I could get it to report the delta values per day, regardless of whether logging was 24/7 or not (assuming the stats included samples from the same time each day).

The other attached example shows 4 days of 24/7 logging & the total DS ES value reported for the period is correct.

The real DS ES data, using daily cumulative delta values, is:-

1140 between 28/11/14 & 29/11/14

1007 between 27/11/14 & 28/11/14

1091 between 26/11/14 & 27/11/14

1105 between 25/11/14 & 26/11/14

i.e. a total of 4343 for the 4 day period