Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Ronski]

I can't reproduce this anywhere under any version of Firefox or Waterfox I have here under Win 10, it never wraps. The graph height is not related but it will obviously displace a graph vertically. It might possibly do this on a low res smartphone display although it's fine on Galaxy S5. I have made a slight change to the code that might stop it but no way to test it here.

It has changed as there is now no space between "Line status for" and the username. After a little bit of fiddling I think it's related to the zoom level (CTRL +), after increasing the zoom a few times the minutes in the uptime drops down a line. No shortage of pixels here, in fact the opposite hence zooming in a bit - running at 2560 x 1440.

[tbailey2]

Well I'm on 2560 x 1600 but it never does it... OTOH I never zoom.

[Ronski]

Does it do it if you do zoom?

[kitz]

I am not aware of a method of detecting banding that won't generate more queries than it answers. Perhaps Kitz might have some ideas.

It could be a tricky one to do because banding isnt always at exactly x999 or x000 for example you may see a x987 or x993.  You'd also need to look at other factors such as if there is surplus SNRm ..  and ensure that any surplus isnt just a normal day to day fluctuation.  Cant rely on max attainable either if the line is interleaved.
Sometimes it takes an advanced eye to spot if a line is suspected of being banded   Probably the easiest way to pick it up is if the line always syncs at the same rate even if there is more SNRm.

[tbailey2]

Does it do it if you do zoom?

Nope not even at 500%, not in FF or Iron

[roseway]

I can see it. I have 115% zoom permanently set, and it appears as below. As you can see, I can't even get to the options bar to change to a different user etc.

If I revert to 100% zoom, it appears normal.

[tbailey2]

What browser is that? The cause there are the traffic lights.

Edit:
I am going to put it back to where it was this morning before it was reported as I'm working blind not being able to see the problem and generating new errors in the process. Nothing had changed in some days (9th May) there prior to then. Done.

[Ronski]

I don't think it's a recent thing, can't remember when I first noticed it, must of been a couple of weeks ago at least.

[roseway]

What browser is that? The cause there are the traffic lights.

It's Pale Moon 26.1.1 (in effect, Firefox 26.1.1). I hear what you say about the traffic lights, but if I changed to a shorter user name (such as my own) it displayed correctly.

Anyway, I now see the same effect as Ron, and it doesn't seem to have any disadvantageous result.

[tbailey2]

That's weird as even at 500% I have no problem in Firefox 46.0.1 as attached - I even removed some data and a word from the status bar about an hour ago which should have solved any problem. I'd guess it's maybe a font problem of some sort...

[NewtronStar]

With all this extra info on MDWS users stats I have had to increase monitor resolution from 1024 x 768 to 1920 X 1080 and purchase a magnify glass, come on guys there is only so much a human eye can see if your at the 40+ age with farsighted issues 

[Ronski]

Changing it to 'Status for' username seems to have fixed it thanks.

With all this extra info on MDWS users stats I have had to increase monitor resolution from 1024 x 768 to 1920 X 1080 and purchase a magnify glass, come on guys there is only so much a human eye can see if your at the 40+ age with farsighted issues 

I'm not far off 50 and now have glasses for close up work, but there's no way I'd go back to a 1920 x 1080 resolution, let alone a 1024 x 768, but my monitor is 27" so that helps.

[tbailey2]

Thanks

As well as that I've defined a font-family (Arial) in CSS for the table as it was missing  - I noticed here that the characters all compressed slightly afterwards so was hoping that might help 

[tbailey2]

Well my monitor is 30" - and aged 71 and with varifocal glasses since I was 45 it works well. I never have to magnify in any way though, probably 'yet'.

[roseway]

I confirm that the display is now good at the 115% zooming which I use.