Kitz ADSL Broadband Information
adsl spacer  
Support this site
Home Broadband ISPs Tech Routers Wiki Forum
 
     
   Compare ISP   Rate your ISP
   Glossary   Glossary
 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: Seems that since swapping routers...  (Read 6106 times)

renluop

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 3225
Re: Seems that since swapping routers...
« Reply #30 on: June 30, 2014, 10:13:09 AM »

If you do find out anything about telnet on the v5 I'll certainly be interested.
Nothing came back bar this from a forum member:
Quote
I think you cannot use monitoring program (DSL Stats i suppose). The W8960N is on the list of supported router but it's a mistake.
Logged

roseway

  • Administrator
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 39533
  • Penguins CAN fly
    • DSLstats
Re: Seems that since swapping routers...
« Reply #31 on: June 30, 2014, 10:18:57 AM »

I've had one thought since - it may be possible to get DSLstats to work with it by using a longer sample time, such as 2 minutes. DSLstats does work with earlier versions of the W8960N as far as I know. I need to add a note on the compatibility list.
Logged
  Eric

boost

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 763
Re: Seems that since swapping routers...
« Reply #32 on: June 30, 2014, 02:07:45 PM »

I had to start using the longer time time too but does that mean I am missing potential SNR dips? I guess it's OK for anything counter based but the SNR would be read at point in time?

I wonder what they've done to this router lol :(
Logged

roseway

  • Administrator
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 39533
  • Penguins CAN fly
    • DSLstats
Re: Seems that since swapping routers...
« Reply #33 on: June 30, 2014, 03:21:48 PM »

I tried connecting mine up and using DSLstats with a 2-minute sample period. It worked for 5 samples and then started giving login errors. So I'll be interested to see if it does keep running in your case.

A longer period between samples does indeed mean that you'll be missing some short term variations in SNRM and the other time-related graphs, so it's certainly not ideal. As to what they've done, I guess it's a deliberate policy to limit the number of successive telnet logins over some period, for some reason. Maybe it's done for security reasons.
Logged
  Eric
Pages: 1 2 [3]
 

anything