Kitz ADSL Broadband Information
adsl spacer  
Support this site
Home Broadband ISPs Tech Routers Wiki Forum
 
     
   Compare ISP   Rate your ISP
   Glossary   Glossary
 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: rs-ux and rs-w v2.9 released  (Read 6900 times)

roseway

  • Administrator
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 43568
  • Penguins CAN fly
    • DSLstats
rs-ux and rs-w v2.9 released
« on: April 23, 2013, 02:56:40 PM »

Changes since v2.8:

- added support for Thomson/Technicolor modem/routers
- now takes account of Annex M tone bands
- if an update is detected when the program is running minimised, it now restores itself
- fixed issue whereby max attainable speed values were always zero with some routers
- improved the handling of misreported CRC and FEC errors (negative values trapped)
- improved the handling of router error conditions (router switched off, disconnected etc.)
- squeezed a little more data into the status bar
- changed the scaling of SNR per tone when included with bitloading so it equates with 3 dB/bit

Logged
  Eric

ryant704

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 318
Re: rs-ux and rs-w v2.9 released
« Reply #1 on: April 23, 2013, 03:35:53 PM »

Problem still persists, shows negative values in CRC and FEC errors. Also when going on Y axis still forces the program to crash... going to try something quickly.

Also when you put a number in to the averages it now defaults it to 1.

Nice to see an update though :)
Logged

roseway

  • Administrator
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 43568
  • Penguins CAN fly
    • DSLstats
Re: rs-ux and rs-w v2.9 released
« Reply #2 on: April 23, 2013, 03:50:48 PM »

Quote
Problem still persists, shows negative values in CRC and FEC errors. Also when going on Y axis still forces the program to crash

I'm sorry about that, it's supposed to be fixed. I'll check again.

Quote
Also when you put a number in to the averages it now defaults it to 1.

Sorry, but what do you mean by that? The averages shouldn't be editable.

Logged
  Eric

les-70

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1254
Re: rs-ux and rs-w v2.9 released
« Reply #3 on: April 23, 2013, 04:17:38 PM »

  All running well on annex m.   Nothing else to report!   :) .

  I have not been following the "negative values" but I only get them if I have rebooted the modem with rsw running.  In which case it seems best and reasonable to restart rsw if you don't like negatives.

 I am still puzzled over my upstream errors but it is the modem output and not your program that is puzzling me. 
Logged

roseway

  • Administrator
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 43568
  • Penguins CAN fly
    • DSLstats
Re: rs-ux and rs-w v2.9 released
« Reply #4 on: April 23, 2013, 04:42:18 PM »

Thanks Les.
Logged
  Eric

c6em

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 504
Re: rs-ux and rs-w v2.9 released
« Reply #5 on: April 23, 2013, 05:25:06 PM »

I've still got problems - just the same.....only just started running v2.9 now.
see attached
This is on linear - swap FEC plot to log - instant program failure
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.......

Edit: just to say I choose the default correction in the graphs setup tab ie  Negative FEC/CRC --->zero
« Last Edit: April 23, 2013, 05:40:49 PM by c6em »
Logged

roseway

  • Administrator
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 43568
  • Penguins CAN fly
    • DSLstats
Re: rs-ux and rs-w v2.9 released
« Reply #6 on: April 23, 2013, 06:38:38 PM »

I can see where I went wrong - I only did half a job. :-[

I will sort this out as quickly as possible.
Logged
  Eric

krypton

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 128
Re: rs-ux and rs-w v2.9 released
« Reply #7 on: April 23, 2013, 09:41:04 PM »

It is running well. I saw no errors, crashes or negative values since v2.8 even if it ran more than 30 hours continuously.

I have a little suggestion: It would be more consistent if the same options were available on the CRC and FEC Error tabs.
Logged

roseway

  • Administrator
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 43568
  • Penguins CAN fly
    • DSLstats
Re: rs-ux and rs-w v2.9 released
« Reply #8 on: April 23, 2013, 10:48:14 PM »

Quote
I have a little suggestion: It would be more consistent if the same options were available on the CRC and FEC Error tabs.

Yes, I suppose it would. The reason I didn't do so was that FECs tend to have a far wider range of values than CRCs, so the option of a logarithmic scale was useful for FECs but not for CRCs. Perhaps the simplest and most practical arrangement would be to make both of them logarithmic.
Logged
  Eric

snadge

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1450
Re: rs-ux and rs-w v2.9 released
« Reply #9 on: April 23, 2013, 11:02:45 PM »

thanks for the update Eric and scaling the SNR graph to 3db/1bit :)

where are you pulling the uptime from? because ive noticed the Total Time always says 1 Day 'x' hours in the stats? - but then I found out that AS is the uptime in seconds, so divide by 60 for minutes and again for hours - I was using that in DMT Tool to get my uptime from, do the division, the divide my CRC by uptime for the per hour result...a bit of a faff
Logged
Aquiss - 900/110/16ms - TP-Link AR73

roseway

  • Administrator
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 43568
  • Penguins CAN fly
    • DSLstats
Re: rs-ux and rs-w v2.9 released
« Reply #10 on: April 23, 2013, 11:24:56 PM »

Quote
where are you pulling the uptime from?

I've lost a fair amount of hair over this question. Some routers report the uptime directly in a line starting "Since link time = ..." and if that line exists I get the uptime from there. For the remainder I convert the AS value as you suggest. But unfortunately the AS value doesn't equate with DSL uptime in all routers, so I just label it "AS uptime".

What router do you use, and what exactly does the program show for the two uptimes on the status bar?
Logged
  Eric

snadge

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1450
Re: rs-ux and rs-w v2.9 released
« Reply #11 on: April 24, 2013, 12:32:40 AM »

its reporting the correct time for both System and AS  - Iam using Netgear DG834N (DG Team 1018)

when I said the "total time" is always 1 day + x hours I meant the telnet stats...nothing to do with your program, my HG612 and 2504N were the same... but the HG612 displayed "since link time" at the bottom as you mention, the DG834N doesnt and I cant remember if the 2504N did or not, I only just recently learned of the AS value and its meaning because the 834N actually has (uptime) next to AS lol... and I thought "ahh.. that must be the link time in seconds"

I hope you dont mind but Ive got some more idea's, suggestions etc  :D

1) the bottom part of the GUI that never changes whatever section your looking at, what if it had a 3rd line of data too possibly include, Vendor Chipset, Down Line attenuation, Up Line Attenuation & INP..? and also including the Interleave Depth value next to the Interleave stats, e.g. Interleave: ON (128) - it could be layed out like so:

System Uptime - Down Speed - Up Speed - Interleave OFF/ ON (Value)
AS Uptime - Down SNRM - Up SNRM - INP OFF/ON (Value)
Vendor ID - Down Atten - Up Atten - ES/Hour


These quite important diagnostics stats are immediatley available all together at all times, one could argue Vendor ID is not an important stat (which I suppose it isnt) but its one you dont see included in any other router tool as information readily available in the GUI, and I think its good to know when helping someone to try and determine which router (chipset) would be best for their line by also suggesting the possibility of matching it too their ISP's DSLAM/MSAN.

2) What about switches for i24k, CoMinMgn, PhyRE etc? - with all the warnings for noobs of course, maybe on the Tweak section as they could be executed along with the SNRM Tweak, and/or a shell with selectable commands for users to fire off themselves like DMT Tool has?

3) Showing the amount of traffic corrected (RSCorr) and uncorrected (RSUnCorr) in 'percentages' in relation to the total traffic (RS), I normally work this out myself (with difficulty) so I can see how much of an impact different Noise Margins I test are having on my line (aswell as using CRC's as a gauge)... e.g. with 7db Noise Margin I get about 0.05% corrected traffic - with 3db Noise Margin it can be 1-2% corrected traffic... I can better 'gauge' the effect of noise on my line...if I was to turn on one day knowing I was on my usual 7db Noise Margin and seen really high percentages of FEC then I would know something aint right.

4) What about a section that includes information about the router its monitoring? specs etc.. like chipset (xdsl, Lan, Wifi) and LAN, Wifi speeds etc?
5) I notice in the averages window there just enough white space to include a column "since link time" hehehehe ;) - no but really i just want to say a massive thanks for everything youve done on this... I really appreciate the effort :)

I dont think there is any reason to keep DMT Tool now?
Logged
Aquiss - 900/110/16ms - TP-Link AR73

roseway

  • Administrator
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 43568
  • Penguins CAN fly
    • DSLstats
Re: rs-ux and rs-w v2.9 released
« Reply #12 on: April 24, 2013, 08:02:37 AM »

Thanks for all those comments snadge. :)

They're all good suggestions, and I'll look seriously at them shortly. At the moment my main task is to properly nail down the remaining bugs (particularly the issue with negative CRC/FEC values) before I add any more significant features. But I'll come back to it very soon.
Logged
  Eric

c6em

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 504
Re: rs-ux and rs-w v2.9 released
« Reply #13 on: April 24, 2013, 01:24:19 PM »


You probably don't want anymore suggestions for the moment, (snadge has got some good ones) but......

On the snapshot saved graphs there is nothing to say from what programand version they have come from.
When testing out V2.9 vs v2.8 yesterday I was being ultra careful which graph I saved came from which edition.
This might be a good idea to have something like for example "program name V2.9" added some corner of the graph particularly if they are going to start being used by ISP's/forum users etc as evidence of a dodgy line.
Logged

roseway

  • Administrator
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 43568
  • Penguins CAN fly
    • DSLstats
Re: rs-ux and rs-w v2.9 released
« Reply #14 on: April 24, 2013, 03:37:11 PM »

That's a good suggestion, thanks.
Logged
  Eric
Pages: [1] 2
 

anything