Kitz ADSL Broadband Information
adsl spacer  
Support this site
Home Broadband ISPs Tech Routers Wiki Forum
 
     
   Compare ISP   Rate your ISP
   Glossary   Glossary
 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5

Author Topic: Possible Interference?  (Read 21086 times)

snadge

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1450
Re: Possible Interference?
« Reply #45 on: October 03, 2012, 09:26:46 PM »

be interesting this - if the RF3 knocks out noise OR broadband signal (or both) I think that pretty much proves that the i-Plate has only a 22mH Inductor and not an RF3 filter, otherwise the result would be same.

at least you got some of the noise down, has the speed improved at all since that?
Logged
Aquiss - 900/110/16ms - TP-Link AR73

snadge

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1450
Re: Possible Interference?
« Reply #46 on: October 04, 2012, 04:20:14 PM »

I got my HG612 - having problems actually getting internet through it...could you help?

I got sync to exchange and IP address from sky...but nothing coming through? i can access router
Logged
Aquiss - 900/110/16ms - TP-Link AR73

GigabitEthernet

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2243
Re: Possible Interference?
« Reply #47 on: October 04, 2012, 09:19:16 PM »

...has the speed improved at all since that?

Nope.
Logged

GigabitEthernet

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2243
Re: Possible Interference?
« Reply #48 on: October 05, 2012, 08:45:31 PM »

Received the RF3 today and installed it. The SNRM seems to be better and I seem to be syncing faster than I usually would be at this time of day. Attached is a QLN graph with the RF3 installed.
Logged

burakkucat

  • Respected
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 38300
  • Over the Rainbow Bridge
    • The ELRepo Project
Re: Possible Interference?
« Reply #49 on: October 05, 2012, 08:54:28 PM »

Ah, ha! That agrees with the data recorded before and after the fitment of an RF3 to my line.  :)
Logged
:cat:  100% Linux and, previously, Unix. Co-founder of the ELRepo Project.

Please consider making a donation to support the running of this site.

GigabitEthernet

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2243
Re: Possible Interference?
« Reply #50 on: October 05, 2012, 08:59:02 PM »


Ah, ha! That agrees with the data recorded before and after the fitment of an RF3 to my line.  :)


It's definitely better, but I don't know how much better.


Attached are two QLN plots showing before and after
Logged

GigabitEthernet

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2243
Re: Possible Interference?
« Reply #51 on: October 05, 2012, 09:00:39 PM »

Here are the current stats (synced in the evening which explains the lower sync). The SNRM is better, I'm sure:

Code: [Select]

Status: Showtime
Retrain Reason: 8000
Max: Upstream rate = 1068 Kbps, Downstream rate = 8124 Kbps
Path: 0, Upstream rate = 1072 Kbps, Downstream rate = 7232 Kbps


Link Power State: L0
Mode: ADSL2+
TPS-TC: ATM Mode
Trellis: U:ON /D:ON
Line Status: No Defect
Training Status: Showtime
Down Up
SNR (dB): 5.5 5.7
Attn(dB): 43.5 22.1
Pwr(dBm): 20.9 12.9
ADSL2 framing
Path 0
MSGc: 59 10
B: 226 24
M: 1 8
T: 1 6
R: 16 6
S: 1.0000 5.9280
L: 1944 278
D: 32 4
Counters
Path 0
SF: 339922 310611
SFErr: 11 80
RS: 22094804 3722539
RSCorr: 5715 461
RSUnCorr: 118 0


Path 0
HEC: 107 90
OCD: 0 0
LCD: 0 0
Total Cells: 94216124 13946701
Data Cells: 1444260 213517
Drop Cells: 0
Bit Errors: 8002 7942


ES: 5 43
SES: 0 0
UAS: 29 29
AS: 5524


Path 0
INP: 1.05 0.34
PER: 16.25 17.78
delay: 8.00 5.92
OR: 32.00 7.19


Bitswap: 2772 0


Total time = 1 hours 32 min 41 sec
FEC: 5715 461
CRC: 11 80
ES: 5 43
SES: 0 0
UAS: 29 29
LOS: 0 0
LOF: 0 0
Latest 15 minutes time = 2 min 41 sec
FEC: 70 0
CRC: 0 0
ES: 0 2
SES: 0 0
UAS: 0 0
LOS: 0 0
LOF: 0 0
Previous 15 minutes time = 15 min 0 sec
FEC: 1171 265
CRC: 0 40
ES: 0 18
SES: 0 0
UAS: 0 0
LOS: 0 0
LOF: 0 0
Latest 1 day time = 1 hours 32 min 41 sec
FEC: 5715 461
CRC: 11 80
ES: 5 43
SES: 0 0
UAS: 29 29
LOS: 0 0
LOF: 0 0
Previous 1 day time = 0 sec
FEC: 0 0
CRC: 0 0
ES: 0 0
SES: 0 0
UAS: 0 0
LOS: 0 0
LOF: 0 0
Since Link time = 1 hours 32 min 3 sec
FEC: 5715 461
CRC: 11 80
ES: 5 43
SES: 0 0
UAS: 0 0
LOS: 0 0
LOF: 0 0
« Last Edit: October 05, 2012, 09:07:04 PM by arobertson545 »
Logged

Bald_Eagle1

  • Helpful
  • Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 2721
Re: Possible Interference?
« Reply #52 on: October 05, 2012, 09:14:21 PM »


It's definitely better, but I don't know how much better.

Attached are two QLN plots showing before and after


I'm not too sure about that.

I thought the further away from zero, the "quieter" the noise (meaning the noise is more highly attenuated).

i.e. the "before" graph looks like a quieter connection.


Also, just for curiosity, are you now using M$ Excel or something similar to graph the stats?

Logged

GigabitEthernet

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2243
Re: Possible Interference?
« Reply #53 on: October 05, 2012, 09:24:26 PM »

Also, just for curiosity, are you now using M$ Excel or something similar to graph the stats?

Excel as the scripts don't run on Macs.
Logged

GigabitEthernet

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2243
Re: Possible Interference?
« Reply #54 on: October 05, 2012, 09:25:44 PM »

It's definitely better, but I don't know how much better.

Sorry, I was implying that the SNRM was better.

The QLN graph appears to be worse because it is taken at night, rather than in the day like the other one is.
Logged

burakkucat

  • Respected
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 38300
  • Over the Rainbow Bridge
    • The ELRepo Project
Re: Possible Interference?
« Reply #55 on: October 05, 2012, 10:45:14 PM »


It's definitely better, but I don't know how much better.

Attached are two QLN plots showing before and after


I'm not too sure about that.

I thought the further away from zero, the "quieter" the noise (meaning the noise is more highly attenuated).

i.e. the "before" graph looks like a quieter connection.

Thanks for typing that, Baldy. I was beginning to think that either I was seeing things or had been on some Black Sheep potion!  ::)
Logged
:cat:  100% Linux and, previously, Unix. Co-founder of the ELRepo Project.

Please consider making a donation to support the running of this site.

GigabitEthernet

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2243
Re: Possible Interference?
« Reply #56 on: October 09, 2012, 08:29:31 PM »

Well, I think I have done everything I can now, and I have barely made any difference. Oh well :(.
Logged

GigabitEthernet

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2243
Re: Possible Interference?
« Reply #57 on: October 25, 2012, 05:19:24 PM »

Hello everyone, I am still trying to deal with this 'problem'. Sorry if I am repeating myself, but is there any noise here that could be coming from my own home, or is it mostly RFI?

QLN graph attached.

Thank you,
AR.
Logged

burakkucat

  • Respected
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 38300
  • Over the Rainbow Bridge
    • The ELRepo Project
Re: Possible Interference?
« Reply #58 on: October 25, 2012, 08:15:41 PM »

There's not a lot that one could say about that graph. To my inexperienced eye, it looks to be mainly background "mush".

Have you tried with a laptop computer and the Huawei HG612 both running from a 12 V car battery, whilst the rest of the house is switched off at the main isolator?  :-\
Logged
:cat:  100% Linux and, previously, Unix. Co-founder of the ELRepo Project.

Please consider making a donation to support the running of this site.

GigabitEthernet

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2243
Re: Possible Interference?
« Reply #59 on: October 25, 2012, 08:27:29 PM »

Have you tried with a laptop computer and the Huawei HG612 both running from a 12 V car battery, whilst the rest of the house is switched off at the main isolator?  :-\

No I haven't. How would I go about doing that - sorry if that sounds stupid.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5
 

anything