Hi Step_7, & welcome to the Kitz forum.Hi all,
Now I don't know what that all means but hopefully it provides some data on a longer line than seems to be the norm for FTTC installs. 8) I still don't fully understand why the speeds are so good as all the graphs I've seen indicate that with this line length I should be getting very poor speeds although I think I've always been on 17a rather than 8c whic might be part of it.
I'll have a look at some of the graphing tools next once I've updated Ubuntu on an old laptop.
You do indeed appear to be doing very well on a 2200m D-side line length.
The most useful commands to run are:-
xdslcmd info --pbParams
xdslcmd info --linediag
xdslcmd info --bits
xdslcmd info --show
xdslcmd info --stats
If those were run one after the other, & ideally saved into a single log file using PuTTy terminal, you would have all the relevant stats to graph a snapshot of your connection at any given time.
You could do this using the Linux script already available publicly, or I could let you have copies of my Windows only batch files that have some automation built in.
I have attached a snapshot example of my connection as the first graph set shown below.
If you wished to automatically monitor your connection's stats over time, including Sync speeds, SNRM fluctuations, error counts etc. I could let you have copies of Windows only batch files that would do this for you.
An example of my connection's latest 24 hours ongoing stats is attached as the second graph set shown below.
The third graph set shows my connection's stats over 40 days.
burakkucat is correct. As my service is also provided by Plusnet, I may well mither you to death regarding your connection's stats & performance.
Let's hope you are able to continue to achieve better performance than your original estimated speeds.
We tend to prefer speedtest.net for the most consistent speed test results:-
Paul.
[attachment deleted by admin]