, he thought about
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
- April 26, 2024, 10:39:07 PM
- Welcome, Guest
News:
81
on: April 23, 2024, 10:11:29 AM
|
||
Started by burakkucat - Last post by roseway | ||
82
on: April 23, 2024, 10:10:16 AM
|
||
Started by burakkucat - Last post by roseway | ||
finder(s) keeper(s)
|
83
on: April 23, 2024, 10:09:32 AM
|
||
Started by burakkucat - Last post by roseway | ||
uxorious husband
|
84
on: April 23, 2024, 10:07:24 AM
|
||
Started by burakkucat - Last post by roseway | ||
expensive
|
85
on: April 23, 2024, 10:06:15 AM
|
||
Started by burakkucat - Last post by roseway | ||
misters
|
86
on: April 23, 2024, 01:57:30 AM
|
||
Started by Chrysalis - Last post by Alex Atkin UK | ||
Problem is the government seem to go on about how faster broadband brings economic benefits to those areas, so getting them done sooner rather than later is seen as good for the economy. But short of home working, I have no idea how they come to that conclusion.
I mean I'm all for getting fibre to everyone as quickly as possible, but if areas are getting government funding and then shortly after get overbuilt, there is clearly a problem with the assessment of what areas actually need government funding in the first place. At the very least ANY network that used government funding should require duct sharing agreements, to reduce disruption if there is any overbuild and to pay back those funds. I mean I'm kinda on the fence from the start, as I still feel the fibre should be nationalised personally then leased out to ISPs - so we don't need overbuild to begin with. I actually did a bit a business studies at school and it makes me laugh now as the one thing I remember was them talking about how we only have one gas supply and one electricity supply, because its impractical to duplicate service supply. Yet this is exactly what we ended up with for telecoms. |
87
on: April 22, 2024, 10:52:13 PM
|
||
Started by dee.jay - Last post by Chrysalis | ||
For the curious I think my ONT is a Calix GP1000g.
|
88
on: April 22, 2024, 10:19:20 PM
|
||
Started by Chrysalis - Last post by Chrysalis | ||
He sort of agrees with me, I felt like a lone wolf whenever I said I felt was wrong order to do all the expensive areas first.
https://youtu.be/fkhE6Wg0myA?si=CUcdOxBYIbU4Roj5&t=2140 |
89
on: April 22, 2024, 10:13:10 PM
|
||
Started by Chrysalis - Last post by Alex Atkin UK | ||
Those are CF commit rates Alex. I assumed they were, they just seem excessively low even for GPON and doubly so that it would be the same for a top-tier ISP vs something more budget friendly. As for visible contention, its going to be very interesting once I can get OR fastest service to see how peak hours compare to off peak. Although I have no idea if anyone else is on my PON or not. Also very odd a symmetrical service has an asymmetrical minimum. I'll still move to CF in a heartbeat if they ever get round to coming here. Still in plan but there's barely any roadworks showing up for them any more and it seems no closer than 2 years ago. |
90
on: April 22, 2024, 08:48:43 PM
|
||
Started by Chrysalis - Last post by doofus | ||