Kitz Forum

Broadband Related => ISPs => Topic started by: Weaver on August 03, 2016, 01:54:18 PM

Title: AAISP improvements for FTTC customers
Post by: Weaver on August 03, 2016, 01:54:18 PM
See
    http://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2016/08/aaisp-cut-80mbps-fttc-home-broadband-price-make-standard.html
Title: Re: AAISP improvements for FTTC customers
Post by: vic0239 on August 04, 2016, 09:26:04 AM
Thanks for the heads-up, I hadn't noticed this. A very welcome piece of news indeed.
Title: Re: AAISP improvements for FTTC customers
Post by: UncleUB on August 04, 2016, 06:41:07 PM
Do you have to request the upgrade or is it done automatically.I'm on Home 1 FTTC at present on a 40/10 connection.
Title: Re: AAISP improvements for FTTC customers
Post by: j0hn on August 04, 2016, 06:56:03 PM
If I read the page right it's a one off fee of £15 to order the upgrade, though no new contract.
Title: Re: AAISP improvements for FTTC customers
Post by: UncleUB on August 05, 2016, 05:33:00 PM
If I read the page right it's a one off fee of £15 to order the upgrade, though no new contract.

Thats correct,I phoned them this afternoon to check and then proceeded to do the regrade online.
Title: Re: AAISP improvements for FTTC customers
Post by: UncleUB on August 08, 2016, 01:31:19 PM
A bit better than my old ADSL days of getting 2.5mb down and 0.6mb up  :-X
(https://forum.kitz.co.uk/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.speedtest.net%2Fresult%2F5537072186.png&hash=643f28b078f7e6834732d0d09f290fd5e1a1cf75) (http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/5537072186)
 
* Test done wireless on my MacBook.
Title: Re: AAISP improvements for FTTC customers
Post by: burakkucat on August 08, 2016, 04:28:23 PM
That's a respectable result!  :)

I see your connection is categorised as "Faster than 93% of GB".

When I check my circuit (operating in G.992.3 mode, a.k.a. ADSL2 mode) I am told that my connection is "faster download than 20% on DSL in the UK" with a result of 4.65/0.81 Mbps.  ;)
Title: Re: AAISP improvements for FTTC customers
Post by: tickmike on August 08, 2016, 07:20:57 PM
My speed check says I'm 'slower than 82% of the uk'  :'(    3.17/0.63   16ms
Title: Re: AAISP improvements for FTTC customers
Post by: Dray on August 08, 2016, 07:30:26 PM
Mine says faster than 98% of GB
Title: Re: AAISP improvements for FTTC customers
Post by: burakkucat on August 08, 2016, 09:36:22 PM
My speed check says I'm 'slower than 82% of the uk'  :'(    3.17/0.63   16ms

Which equates to approximately "faster download than 18% on DSL in the UK". So you and I are within 2% of each other.  :)
Title: Re: AAISP improvements for FTTC customers
Post by: NEXUS2345 on August 08, 2016, 11:13:52 PM
Mine is also rather pessimistic, even though it is good for an ADSL2+ line. Slower than 57% of the UK. Better ping than many on FTTC though which I am pleased by, even over wi-fi.
(https://forum.kitz.co.uk/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.speedtest.net%2Fresult%2F5538339162.png&hash=c5ff0ed7b931ff54353df3493b5de2c38da981b3)
Title: Re: AAISP improvements for FTTC customers
Post by: Weaver on August 09, 2016, 02:31:20 AM
See
    http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/i/1736126558
Title: Re: AAISP improvements for FTTC customers
Post by: burakkucat on August 09, 2016, 10:59:52 AM
See
    http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/i/1736126558

Knowing your location and the infrastructure involved in bringing xDSL signals to you, that is also a respectable result!  :)
Title: Re: AAISP improvements for FTTC customers
Post by: Weaver on August 09, 2016, 04:05:31 PM
At the start of 2016 I used to get a downstream speedtest result from speedof.me of >7.7 Mbps, and until fairly recently my combined upload speed was > 1.0 Mbps.

The upload speed loss is a complete mystery, in that the DSL numbers don't seem to have changed. Neither can one tester be blamed as all show a decrease, even though they don't agree with one another. I haven't examined the history of Firebrick software upgrades to see if there's a possibility of the Firebrick's upload aggregation having become less optimal.

The download speed is due to sync speed reductions of a few hundred k across all three lines, and the noise margins have grown less be around 1 dB. It's possible that the attenuation has worsened slightly, I'd have to recheck this.