Kitz Forum
Announcements => News Articles => Topic started by: AArdvark on September 01, 2015, 07:03:13 PM
-
(https://forum.kitz.co.uk/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1072.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fw364%2FGrapheneMan%2FGoogle_zpszjd37cm7.png&hash=4ed0018287c4627f01adb43a005350698fbba91e)
I wonder how much this costs.
We seem to be heading towards more flat designs with bright colours, everywhere.
Does the Design Industry suffer Fashion Trends also ?
-
flat = mobile friendly :(
-
There old one was flat too so no difference for mobile bandwidth etc.
I think the font for the old one was much nicer.
-
not so much for bandwidth but more to do with how it looks on small screens.
-
The old font was much nicer.
Remediality, I made up a wurd miss
-
Waste of time and money if you ask me.
Googles new and old logos shrunk to 100 px and then 50px
I sometimes wonder if we are going backwards :(
-
New Coke
-
Google has changed its logo. Is it important? Is it relevant to any thing I do? (You do? / The price of fish?) :shrug2:
-
The old font was much nicer.
Remediality, I made up a wurd miss
I know what you mean :D
It is impacting all the Oses ... Android on.
After years of making higher & higher res devices to display the fancy Fonts & Graphics, the graphics are simplified because we now want to display things on a watch ??? >:(
-
I preferred Google when it was run by alines
https://www.google.com/doodles/roswells-66th-anniversar (https://www.google.com/doodles/roswells-66th-anniversar)y
This is wonderfully atmospheric, and very pleasing
Ian
-
Google has changed its logo. Is it important? Is it relevant to any thing I do? (You do? / The price of fish?) :shrug2:
Essentially, you have understood the point.
Yet, Google felt compelled to do it anyway and media to report on it.
I am sure the Fish connection will be made clear in due course. :)
-
I see the web page icon ('Favicon') has also changed, to a single multicoloured 'G'.
The new Icon certainly looks prominent and eye-caching, but to me it is so prominent as to be almost a little aggressive. Could this be a step back from the 'soft & cuddly' image that I thought Google generally tried to confer upon themselves?
Just my own subjective assessment mind, and no reason to think it will be typical of others. :)