Kitz Forum

Broadband Related => Broadband Technology => Topic started by: snadge on April 20, 2012, 11:12:21 PM

Title: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 20, 2012, 11:12:21 PM
as some of you know it took 4 engineer visits to locate a battery contact fault in my line.

my house has a Junction Box on it on the wall (JB1) - it has 4 pairs going along to another Junction Box on end house 6 doors down (JB2), from there the cables travel 20m to a DP in a duct (DUCT).
so route is NTE-5 -> JB1 -> JB2 -> DUCT (then onto cab then exchange)

now engineer no.2 changed me onto a clean pair in same cable at JB2 (6 doors down) but could not access the duct to hook me up in there.
engineer no.3 goes into duct and hooks that pair up from JB2.
engineer no.4 finds the fault between JB1 and JB2 - he switches me onto a spare pair in that run...

now my pairs from JB1 to JB2 to DUCT have all been changed, the engineers did not leave site once and my service was working when they connected up and tested... now does this mean from the DUCT down to exchange my pair is the same as before? - im being told that he must of changed D-side and E-side tie pairs so im now on a new line right down to the exchange (even though its in same cable) - but Iam not convinced, I think its only that short 70m run thats been changed, the engineers did not visit any cabs or the exchange, am I right in thinking this? or has my line been changed over entirely?

that 70m-90m run (1100m line length or thereabouts) shouldnt make much difference to my connection? our lass says the phone is the clearest its ever been...

Ive been told that its likely there is still a fault on the line (probably at exchange because it all happened when sky switched us over) but convincing sky to do anything about it will be impossible, my 18Mb connection is now 11Mb

anyway - am i right in saying that about only the 70-90m run has been changed?

(https://forum.kitz.co.uk/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg593.imageshack.us%2Fimg593%2F7517%2Fscreenhunter03apr202119.jpg&hash=2a28fb9bca0fd1183024b084473116918b4145d0)

thanks in advance
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: waltergmw on April 21, 2012, 12:11:14 AM
@ Snadge,

BS Might add some more here, but here's a start.

If a lengthy operation was accomplished you would expect to see the engineer plug a tone generator into your master socket and use that to find, and then change your pair. If the engineer's van did not leave your site and then return later then only local changes have been made.

Kind regards,
Walter

Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 21, 2012, 12:17:05 AM
thanks walter

yeah he used a TG and JDSU - none of them left the site, i watched them like a hawk hehe
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: asbokid on April 21, 2012, 12:18:04 AM
Hello snadge,

BlackSheep is really the expert to comment on the routing, cabling, tie-pairs, etc..

Your graphs interest me though..

(https://forum.kitz.co.uk/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg593.imageshack.us%2Fimg593%2F7517%2Fscreenhunter03apr202119.jpg&hash=2a28fb9bca0fd1183024b084473116918b4145d0)

The graphing quirks of DMT make it difficult once again to directly compare.  The first graph from your former o2/BE service, appears to show an ADSL2+ G992.5 Annex M service, whereas the Sky service is plain old Annex A. [1]    Yet we would expect the downstream performance to be favourable in Annex A since more bits are allocated to the downstream than in Annex M.

The low definition of the attenuation graphs make direct comparisons difficult. However the two attenuation plots for o2 and for Sky, look very similar.    At the highest frequencies in the ADSL2+ spectrum, both graphs indicate an attenuation of just over -60dB.

What the graphs do clearly illustrate is that the average bit depth per tone is significantly less with Sky than it was with o2/BE.

The notches in the bit-loading and in the SNR graphs that were present in the o2 service have persisted, and remain focused on the same spectral regions, albeit in exaggerated form. Those notches are much more pronounced with the Sky service and are resulting in greater losses in bandwidth.  As an aside, the notches look like they are caused by RFI-related noise, which could perhaps be caused by equipment in your household.

For whatever reason, the transceiver in the Sky linecard is not so competent as the o2 linecard was at modulating signals that your modem can recover.

cheers, a

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITU_G.992.5_Annex_M
[2] http://www.skyuser.co.uk/forum/sky-broadband-exchange-information/47077-exchange-supports-asdl2-annex-m.html
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 21, 2012, 12:39:44 AM
i have higher def ones for you below

many thanks for the insight asbokid i really appreciate it, i noticed those spikes are in both graphs but the whole spectrum on sky is weakened, not just in those ranges where the RFI spikes are

I didnt think I was on Annex M mind? I never had 3Mb upload, my stats where 1,300k up and 18,600k down with 3db SNRM (16,800k was typical sync rate for SNRM of 6.5db) - but your right cos on SKY i could achieve 18,013k with 7db SRNM - so i was getting more speed than BE/o2 in that respect.

I have been on sky 6 weeks prior to this and acheived 18Mb on their MSAN , when my phone followed it across all this crap happened and i dont believe it was a coincidence, within hours of switch we had problems with noise, dropouts, phone ringing, voices on line, now this is supposedly fixed cos of a fault in cable outside my house?

there is an alarm box we have that makes a humming sound not far from router...that may be source of those 'spikes' , Tomorrow I will see if I can disable it, remove battery and turn off power to boiler, cooker and everything except ground floor sockets and then ensure nothing is plugged in but the router and laptop and re-check

but what can be causing the overall degradation of that signal over the entire spectrum? like I say i had 18Mb sync (7db NM) for 6 weeks prior and it was fine until hours after the switch, dunno if its related lol,,, my next door neighbour has a wireless door bell, it rings everytime a car drives past his house??? lol.... just thought I would mention it haha

here is the SKY one currently: upstream LA seems to be fluctuating between 10-16db and I think i have high errors , especially on upstream

(https://forum.kitz.co.uk/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg801.imageshack.us%2Fimg801%2F7776%2Fscreenhunter03apr210036.jpg&hash=f59148669743f0f232463c95b9e40de1f7d758a7)


and here is the o2/BT one:

(https://forum.kitz.co.uk/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg84.imageshack.us%2Fimg84%2F4184%2Fdmtle.jpg&hash=c456a79fc89760dc9ec9601433136bac1af8c9bb)

thanks
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: burakkucat on April 21, 2012, 01:17:43 AM
A quick comment before Black Sheep arrives.

What you are discussing here is nothing to do with "Tie-Pairs". The are Something Completely Different . . . (b*cat plays The Liberty Bell March (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_Bell_%28march%29), by J P Sousa (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Philip_Sousa), on the electronic organ.  ::)  )

From the description of the work carried out, you have had your service swapped to a different pair between the first junction box (JB1 in your description) and the DP.

The rest of your D-side pair and your E-side pair appear not to have been swapped.
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: asbokid on April 21, 2012, 01:28:48 AM
Hi again, Snadge,

i noticed those spikes are in both graphs but the whole spectrum on sky is weakened, not just in those ranges where the RFI spikes are

One thing that struck me... except for the change of service provider, are you using the same modem as you did with the o2/Be service?

Quote
I didnt think I was on Annex M, mind? I never had 3Mb upload, my stats were 1,300k up and 18,600k down with 3db SNRM (16,800k was typical sync rate for SNRM of 6.5db) -

Ahh. that pretty much confirms that you were on Annex M.   For Annex A, the maximum attainable upstream rate (sync rate) is 1024kbps, which you exceeded with 1300kbps, which indicates that you were getting an Annex M service with o2/Be.

It's quite possible that DMT was wrongly reporting Annex M but it is apparently an option with o2's 'Pro' package, and Annex M has reportedly been provided as a gratis service to those on o2's cheaper packages.

Quote
but you're right cos on SKY i could achieve 18,013k with 7db SNRM - so i was getting more [downstream] speed than BE/o2 in that respect.

Ahh.. that pretty much seals it then.

Quote
I have been on sky 6 weeks prior to this and achieved 18Mb on their MSAN , when my phone followed it across all this crap happened and i don't believe it was a coincidence, within hours of switch we had problems with noise, dropouts, phone ringing, voices on line, now this is supposedly fixed cos of a fault in cable outside my house?

That definitely sounded like the engineer introduced a split pair, although the performance remained surprisingly high in spite of it.

Quote
there is an alarm box we have that makes a humming sound not far from router...that may be source of those 'spikes' , Tomorrow I will see if I can disable it, remove battery and turn off power to boiler, cooker and everything except ground floor sockets and then ensure nothing is plugged in but the router and laptop and re-check

Yeah, do try that. Very good idea.

Quote
but what can be causing the overall degradation of that signal over the entire spectrum? like I say i had 18Mb sync (7db NM) for 6 weeks prior and it was fine until hours after the switch, dunno if it;s related lol,,, my next door neighbour has a wireless door bell, it rings every time a car drives past his house??? lol.... just thought I would mention it haha

Wretched neighbours! 

If you can get the Quiet Line Noise (QLN) data from the modem (what model is it?)  that would allow a lot more detective work on the cause of the overall degradation of your signal, and the possible cause(s) of those notches.


Thanks for posting!  I know it's never nice to have a fault but as perverted as it might see, some people enjoy studying others' problems!  My GP is one of them.  He seems delighted to discover something 'wrong'!   "How fascinating! Your leukocyte count is astonishing, the highest I've ever seen! My goodness! You've made my day! Is there a history of early death in your family? "

cheers, a
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 21, 2012, 02:11:58 AM
@ B'kat - yes.. just "pairs" then is it? :) ...thanks for correcting me, i'll try and change the title and wording :)

@ asbokid -

Quote
One thing that struck me... except for the change of service provider, are you using the same modem as you did with the o2/Be service?

yup same one.. Netgear GT


Quote
Ahh. that pretty much confirms that you were on Annex M

wierd that... who knew? lol ... mind on SKY (annex a) Iam acheiving 1150-1160k ..?


Quote
That definitely sounded like the engineer introduced a split pair, although the performance remained surprisingly high in spite of it.

thats what someone else who knows his stuff said, when it happened the broadband was anywhere from 7Mb-13Mb , when an engineer went to fix it the phone went dead completely and speed stuck at 3Mb - stayed like that for 4 or 5 days cos sky gave me the run-a-round, then 2nd engineer couldnt do anything, 3rd engineer swapped the pair in duct but problems were still there (how didnt he pick up this fault?) and speeds were same as now, then 4th engineer swaps pair from my house to end house (so now the run from JB1 to JB2 to DUCT is all on a new pair in same cable) and the problematic noisey phone and SNR spikes causing dropouts stop - but broadband remains slow with upstream line attenuation fluctuations 10-16db and i think Iam getting a lot of upstream errors but unsure...


Quote
If you can get the Quiet Line Noise (QLN) data from the modem (what model is it?)  that would allow a lot more detective work on the cause of the overall degradation of your signal, and the possible cause(s) of those notches.

its a Netgear DG834GT (DGteam 1018) - I also have the Sagemcom 2504N (which is a better router but is locked out) and I have a Speedtouch 585v6 , this sounds promising? I never heard of QLN values in router...love it when i learn something new :)  -can my GT access this value via telnet? if so how do I do that? cheers


Quote
Thanks for posting!  I know it's never nice to have a fault but as perverted as it might see, some people enjoy studying others' problems!  My GP is one of them.  He seems delighted to discover something 'wrong'!   "How fascinating! Your leukocyte count is astonishing, the highest I've ever seen! Is there a history of early death in your family?"

hahaha - that cheered me up, hey the pleasure is all mine... you have been a massive help as you have pointed out a lot of stuff I wasnt aware of and looking forward to my tests tomorrow and hopefully getting this QLT value - Sky's Zoe Quiet Line Test said "no echo and a little noise" if thats any help - my A/C Balance on line was 63db (if thats any help lol) - the engineers JDSU reported the pair quality test was good...but that would be the physical aspect of it I suppose.

thanks again for your help, I look forward to posting my results tomorrow - I hope it is in my home because then I know I can rectify it...

CHEERS :)
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: asbokid on April 21, 2012, 03:00:42 AM
Quote
If you can get the Quiet Line Noise (QLN) data from the modem (what model is it?)  that would allow a lot more detective work on the cause of the overall degradation of your signal, and the possible cause(s) of those notches.

its a Netgear DG834GT (DGteam 1018) - I also have the Sagemcom 2504N (which is a better router but is locked out) and I have a Speedtouch 585v6 , this sounds promising? I never heard of QLN values in router...love it when i learn something new :)  -can my GT access this value via telnet? if so how do I do that? cheers

The modem that DMT queried for those line stats - that is the modem with the Broadcom BCM6348 chipset - must have a telnet interface in the firmware. There must also be a tool called adslcfg a.k.a. adslctl or even just adsl that is obtaining the tonemap data from the DSP driver for SNR, QLN, HLOG and Bit Loading.

The tool, whatever it is called in your firmware, will produce output like this..

Code: [Select]
# xdslcmd info --SNR
...
Tone number      SNR
   0 0.0000
   1 0.0000
   2 0.0000
   3 0.0000
...
   31 0.0000
   32 0.0000
   33 43.5000
   34 44.7500
...
   508 29.6875
   509 29.5625
   510 30.1875
   511 29.0000
#

DMT and RouterStats graphically plot that data.  There are four main datasets available from Broadcom chipset modems:

Quiet Line Noise (dBm/Hz) or QLN - the DSL equivalent to the Quiet Line voice test.
Signal Noise Ratio (dB) or SNR - recorded on a per subcarrier basis
Attenuation(dB) or HLOG/HLIN - recorded on a per subcarrier basis (HLOG is a logarithmic (decibel) value for attenuation. HLIN is linear scale)
Bit Loading - number of bits loaded per subcarrier

Quote
I look forward to posting my results tomorrow - I hope it is in my home because then I know I can rectify it...

Indeedy.

cheers, a

Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 21, 2012, 04:01:05 PM
well I disabled power to house alarm, boiler, cooker, turned on only ground floor sockets and only the router and modem plugged in, everything else around the house unplugged from wall, phone removed from filtered faceplate so its just the router

and results were identical:- 
- checkout the fluctuations of upstream Line Attenuation, thats not normal is it? ive seen it between 10-16 in last 24 hours

WITH EVERYTHING ON AS NORMAL:

(https://forum.kitz.co.uk/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg35.imageshack.us%2Fimg35%2F7897%2Fdmtwithallpoweron.jpg&hash=f258299161aa3710dcca7e14ca26b67fdd0333db)


WITH EVERYTHING OFF:

(https://forum.kitz.co.uk/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg703.imageshack.us%2Fimg703%2F667%2Fdmtallpoweroff.jpg&hash=2b3f01ec5da2334ceee7e5285f9d0fbbbe749b76)


I think that confirms its not REIN in my house but is external, as I had those spikes before all my troubles its safe to say that THEY are not the cause of my current speed loss either

I used DMT to send command via Telnet, I dont know the command but playing around with it I managed to find this:
adslctl info --QLT

and the returned info was:

adslctl info --QLT
adslctl: too many options
#


was that the wrong command?  Iam unfamiliar with telnet (as you can see)


I also think Iam getting a lot of upstream errors but not sure, struggling to get someone to tell me if they are high or not and how to tell for myself :(


thanks for the help BTW :)

EDIT: router has dropped twice on its own in last 5 minutes, i may be wrong but iam sure errors are high and upstream Line Attenuation has creeped up again to 15.4db - so today its been 11db , 13db, 14db ,15.4db (not in that order , it seems to be random rather that 'climbing')
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: burakkucat on April 21, 2012, 06:46:32 PM
The measured attenuation of the metallic-loop should not vary.  :no:

The fact that it is doing so does not indicate REIN but a physical defect somewhere in the pair between your NTE5/A and (say) the HDF in the exchange.  :-X

Hopefully Black Sheep may be able to add further comments or suggestions?  ???
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: GigabitEthernet on April 21, 2012, 08:17:12 PM
On the DG834GT, you should be able to type "adslctl info --SNR" to get the information asbokid is looking for.
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: asbokid on April 21, 2012, 08:34:57 PM
well I disabled power to house alarm, boiler, cooker, turned on only ground floor sockets and only the router and modem plugged in, everything else around the house unplugged from wall, phone removed from filtered faceplate so its just the router

and results were identical:- 
- checkout the fluctuations of upstream Line Attenuation, thats not normal is it? ive seen it between 10-16 in last 24 hours
...
I think that confirms its not REIN in my house but is external, as I had those spikes before all my troubles its safe to say that THEY are not the cause of my current speed loss either

That's a shame. Maybe the next step is to note the precise frequencies of the noise and with an appropriate radio receiver, try to track down the source.   It would be best first to obtain accurate tonemaps for Quiet Line Noise (QLN), etc..

Quote
I used DMT to send command via Telnet, I dont know the command but playing around with it I managed to find this:
adslctl info --QLT

and the returned info was:

adslctl info --QLT
adslctl: too many options


Put your telnet client into 'log to file' mode..  then issue each of the following commands in turn. The output will run to several thousand lines of raw data.  Once it's graphed it's much easier to study. 

Code: [Select]
adslctl info --vendor
adslctl info --show
adslctl info --SNR
adslctl info --QLN
adslctl info --Hlog
adslctl info --Bits

You're welcome to email or PM it, or zip the output and attach it to a post, maybe?

cheers, a
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: Black Sheep on April 22, 2012, 03:14:12 PM
as some of you know it took 4 engineer visits to locate a battery contact fault in my line.

my house has a Junction Box on it on the wall (JB1) - it has 4 pairs going along to another Junction Box on end house 6 doors down (JB2), from there the cables travel 20m to a DP in a duct (DUCT).
so route is NTE-5 -> JB1 -> JB2 -> DUCT (then onto cab then exchange)

now engineer no.2 changed me onto a clean pair in same cable at JB2 (6 doors down) but could not access the duct to hook me up in there.
engineer no.3 goes into duct and hooks that pair up from JB2.
engineer no.4 finds the fault between JB1 and JB2 - he switches me onto a spare pair in that run...

now my pairs from JB1 to JB2 to DUCT have all been changed, the engineers did not leave site once and my service was working when they connected up and tested... now does this mean from the DUCT down to exchange my pair is the same as before? - im being told that he must of changed D-side and E-side tie pairs so im now on a new line right down to the exchange (even though its in same cable) - but Iam not convinced, I think its only that short 70m run thats been changed, the engineers did not visit any cabs or the exchange, am I right in thinking this? or has my line been changed over entirely?

that 70m-90m run (1100m line length or thereabouts) shouldnt make much difference to my connection? our lass says the phone is the clearest its ever been...

Ive been told that its likely there is still a fault on the line (probably at exchange because it all happened when sky switched us over) but convincing sky to do anything about it will be impossible, my 18Mb connection is now 11Mb

anyway - am i right in saying that about only the 70-90m run has been changed?

(https://forum.kitz.co.uk/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg593.imageshack.us%2Fimg593%2F7517%2Fscreenhunter03apr202119.jpg&hash=2a28fb9bca0fd1183024b084473116918b4145d0)

thanks in advance

Terminology is key to understanding what is happening. Who "is telling you" that the E and D-sides have been changed ?? Also, for clarification, 'tie-pairs' only exist in Telephone Exchanges. The correct wording is just 'pairs', when referring to the Network cabling. It does make a difference when reading event logs on here. ;) :)

From your description, it sounds like the engineers have only changed the pair within the 90mtr cable runs you mention. However, if that is where the fault was found to be, they would not just continue changing the pair all the way back to the Exchange. It wouldn't be cost-effective, time-effective, or serve any purpose.

If a 'pair' is changed on the D-side network from the PCP to the DP, that is always termed a 'D-side swap/change', if it's from an underground joint to another underground joint, or from an underground joint anywhere along the D-side cable run to the DP, this is termed as 'Pair changed in length'. The former is a 81.7P clear code, the latter an 82.1P clear code. Your ISP should have a history of which code was used. We use various codes as an audit trail so our Quality Auditos can perform spontaneous checks on our workmanship.

HTH bud.
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: burakkucat on April 22, 2012, 05:06:16 PM
<snip>

From your description, it sounds like the engineers have only changed the pair within the 90mtr cable runs you mention. However, if that is where the fault was found to be, they would not just continue changing the pair all the way back to the Exchange. It wouldn't be cost-effective, time-effective, or serve any purpose.

If a 'pair' is changed on the D-side network from the PCP to the DP, that is always termed a 'D-side swap/change', if it's from an underground joint to another underground joint, or from an underground joint anywhere along the D-side cable run to the DP, this is termed as 'Pair changed in length'. The former is a 81.7P clear code, the latter an 82.1P clear code. Your ISP should have a history of which code was used.

<snip>

 :thumbs:  Thanks for your clarification, BS.
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 22, 2012, 06:53:00 PM
thanks for the clarification BS :) really appreciate it

it was a user on Sky-Forums (Mr-Slant) who said he has changed the e-side & d-side pairs from my description? this guy knows a lot about it ..I learn a lot from the guy and I think Kitz speaks to him too - he said the fault initially sounded like a split pair, anyway, its pretty obvious that only that short run has been switched over, I'am  99.99% certain of it - perhaps he mis-read my posts..

anyway, i have had a few dropouts in las 24 hours and again the Line Attenuation has fluctuated between 8db and 16db - I have screenshots, it only changes between re-sync's, it doesnt change whilst connected - there has also been a 98db upstream noise margin once, needless to say the router dropped within 15 seconds or so...

ASBOKID - find the zip file attached to the post, I put your commands into DMT tool 1 by 1 and copied & paste into a text file, I put about 10 lines of space between each result

still no replies to my emails from SKY and no call back from Tier 2 as promised... Iam losing my faith in sky support again...just when I thought they got better, does CST Tier 2 not work weekends?
thanks a lot guys.. :)
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: Black Sheep on April 22, 2012, 07:32:33 PM
thanks for the clarification BS :) really appreciate it

it was a user on Sky-Forums (Mr-Slant) who said he has changed the e-side & d-side pairs from my description? this guy knows a lot about it ..I learn a lot from the guy and I think Kitz speaks to him too - he said the fault initially sounded like a split pair, anyway, its pretty obvious that only that short run has been switched over, I'am  99.99% certain of it - perhaps he mis-read my posts..

anyway, i have had a few dropouts in las 24 hours and again the Line Attenuation has fluctuated between 8db and 16db - I have screenshots, it only changes between re-sync's, it doesnt change whilst connected - there has also been a 98db upstream noise margin once, needless to say the router dropped within 15 seconds or so...

ASBOKID - find the zip file attached to the post, I put your commands into DMT tool 1 by 1 and copied & paste into a text file, I put about 10 lines of space between each result

still no replies to my emails from SKY and no call back from Tier 2 as promised... Iam losing my faith in sky support again...just when I thought they got better, does CST Tier 2 not work weekends?
thanks a lot guys.. :)

I can tell you, that from the wording of your post that I answered to, there is no way you can deduce the engineer has performed an E-side change !!

Is Mr Slant looking at other historical data, from other engineers visits to your line ??? As you say yourself, the engineers never left site, so how can they perform an E-side change, unless you're a citizen of Hogwarts ?? ;D
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 22, 2012, 07:58:46 PM
haha - no he has no historical data, maybe I didnt word it properly or confused him using the word "tie-pairs" lol

the thread is here (http://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Sky-Talk-Technical/day-8-and-4-engineer-visits-line-is-still-broken/td-p/392809), never mind!!
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: burakkucat on April 23, 2012, 01:18:26 AM
the thread is here (http://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Sky-Talk-Technical/day-8-and-4-engineer-visits-line-is-still-broken), never mind!!

Oh no it isn't!  :no:  Taking that link just gives a --

Quote
Forum > Page Not Found

 ::)
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 23, 2012, 01:21:21 AM
thanks for pointing that out B'kat :)  I have amended it... :)
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: asbokid on April 23, 2012, 01:30:08 AM
Hi snadge!

just plotted the graphs..

(https://forum.kitz.co.uk/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww3.picturepush.com%2Fphoto%2Fa%2F8101776%2F640%2F8101776.png&hash=2c4617b7a31b632209102623a3046cb16a0b078b)
Click to enlarge (http://picturepush.com/public/8101776)

Bit late to look now, but will try to study them properly 'tomorrow'   :)

cheers, a
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 23, 2012, 01:40:34 AM
wow!! - brilliant, thanks for that - similar to DMT's graphs but in much finer detail :) :)

I had a call from SKY tonight, she was wanting to close the ticket cos my phone was working and tier2 were dealing with me ??? - i said "noooo" - so she kept it open and will call me when she is back in on Wed.
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: asbokid on April 23, 2012, 01:45:05 AM
Just for reference, here are my stats..  LLU talktalk..

Code: [Select]

# xdslcmd info --stats
xdslcmd: ADSL driver and PHY status
Status: Showtime
Retrain Reason: 8000
Max: Upstream rate = 1104 Kbps, Downstream rate = 17348 Kbps
Path: 0, Upstream rate = 1020 Kbps, Downstream rate = 15736 Kbps

Link Power State: L0
Mode: ADSL2+
TPS-TC: ATM Mode
Trellis: U:ON /D:ON
Line Status: No Defect
Training Status: Showtime
Down Up
SNR (dB): 8.8 12.4
Attn(dB): 19.0 9.7
Pwr(dBm): 20.8 12.0

(https://forum.kitz.co.uk/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww1.picturepush.com%2Fphoto%2Fa%2F8101789%2F640%2F8101789.png&hash=4d61f45adfc44d7ebece0c63e55bcd92898a74a3) (http://picturepush.com/public/8101789)

cheers, a
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: Black Sheep on April 23, 2012, 09:41:53 AM
Completely OT, but as I was reading these informative posts, I've only just noticed Asbo's 'signature' (?) at the end of his posts, the one about skydiving.  :lol: :lol:

As you were ......... :)
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: kitz on April 23, 2012, 11:02:20 AM
Going back a bit in the thread but just wanted to confirm a couple of points.

>>> It's quite possible that DMT was wrongly reporting Annex M

That O2 DMT graph is weird. Its showing fully loaded upstream bins in the region of tones 31-56 which means that the line was on Annex_M. 
But the odd thing that strikes me is the shape of the bit loading indicating a PSD mask more in line with Annex_A than Annex_M.
From the graph its almost like only 'half a job' was done at putting that line on Annex_M.  ???   Could well be DMT being stupid but it is all rather odd.

>>> it was a user on Sky-Forums (Mr-Slant) /snip/ and I think Kitz speaks to him too

Just to confirm an earlier post which I said I would... although I speak to him under his real name, I did ask him last week..  and yes it is the same person. 
No... He's not a BT/telecom engineer but knows a lot about adsl & the adsl equipment in the exchange (eg DSLAMS/MSANS/routing), through his work and a previous occupation.
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: asbokid on April 23, 2012, 09:50:41 PM
Snadge.. i just read your thread on the official sky forum, and the excellent advice from Mr Slant.  The frequency-dependent noise is a cursory issue to your other line problems, since the noise pre-existed your migration to sky, and the subsequent fault at the exchange.   If I'm reading it correctly, Mr Slant is recommending that now the problem in the exchange is rectified, you try to get back your original good pair (i.e., all of the sections of your line which were changed or swapped in vain attempts to resolve the problem.)  Mr Slant didn't hold much hope of success there tho', but if Sky has promised to return your line to its previous performance...

As for that noise, basic arithmetic would probably reveal the theoretical loss of bandwidth due to the noise.  A 'line-of-best-fit' could be added to the Bit Loading graph. Where the loading for a carrier is zero or much reduced because of noise, calculate from the l-o-b-f what the loading should have been without that noise. Sum the bit loading for the whole bandplan. Then subtract the difference based on what you get compared to what you should theoretically get without noise.  Since you were getting very good performance with O2/Be,  maybe that noise doesn't cause as many problems as the graph suggests.

cheers, a
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 23, 2012, 11:11:17 PM
@ Asbokid - Mr-Slant is saying that , but he also thinks my entire run of cable has been switched, when it hasn't - I am on the same cable and same pairs to the exchange apart from the last 70-90m up here.

consider this:


1) only a 70-90m run has been changed into different pair / same cable
2) I was getting the same 11-12Mb speed for 36 hours after the switch before any engineers came out.
3) those noise spikes were present on my old line
4) Line Attenuation (upstream) fluctuates 8-16db

what happened was as soon as they switched the phone line over to MSAN (my broadband was already there for 6 weeks) the speed dropped and would be anywhere from 7Mb-13Mb and we had problems on the line, I contacted sky and the next day they sent an engineer out too exchange too fix what they said was a "crossed wire" - when he done this my broadband speed dropped to the 3Mb and no phone...for 4 days...until the next lot of engineers eventually changed that 70m run onto a different pair but in same cable, then its back up to 11-12Mb again (but stable).

I am pretty certain considering the above AND the fact my upstream line attenuation fluctuates between 8-16db that there is still a fault at the exchange somewhere - if it was the change in pairs then the speed loss would not have happened before?? - that speed fluctuated because them switching me over kicked over a fault at this end which wasn't previously affecting my signal..but now it did...dunno how? change in voltages or build up of resistance due to the fault at the exchange , the phone rang a few times and other people were on the line - i think there was too much voltage on the line because of this new fault and caused my degrading cable (which previously wasnt affecting my broadband) to "fall-over" and become a massive nuisance...I dunno if that's possible but thats what I think happened. this is when the phone become really bad, the next day the engineer done something at the exchange and the phone went dead and the broadband dropped to 3Mb...like I say it stayed like that for 4 days - then these 3 engineers manage to find the bad bit in cable that was "kicked over" by the fault at the exchange...change the pair in that run which repaired that...then my broadband is back up to 12Mb (roundabout the same figure after the switch and before phone went dead)

taking into account all that and the fluctuating Upstream Line Attenuation; I think there is still a problem in the exchange...

what do you think?

Iam so pee'd off with it you wont believe it - two weeks and still not sorted, major stress chasing sky all the time cos they do NOTHING once ther reply to you, full of false promises - the tier 2 rep didnt even call me back and teir 1 called me last night and wanted to close the case!!! i told her no... she had a look on Tier 2 case it says "CLOSING PENDING"...?? she says she is back in on Wednesday and will call me at 3.30pm to see if he has called me up yet...

annoying thing is I said to sky weeks before the switch that I wanted to opt out as I was worried that the switch would screw it all up for me and give me less speed!!!! - I PREDICTED THIS WOULD HAPPEN - they said "no you cant opt out, but if your speed drops we will sort it out for you"...

iam really upset about it all actually.... feel like Iam being conned and messed about...WHY DID I BOTHER...its like being with Tiscali again! :( I certainly wont ever recommend them

and they now go and advertise 6 months free on TV - I reckon they will introduce FUP/TS to manage the network congestion from further surges of new customers because of such offers - they already have loads of exchanges congested and go and do that?
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: asbokid on April 24, 2012, 02:49:43 AM
EDIT: sorry, I didn't appreciate that your upstream attenuation value is fluctuating across re-syncs. So the above, now deleted, was garbage.

Quote
- that speed fluctuated because them switching me over kicked over a fault at this end which wasn't previously affecting my signal..but now it did...dunno how? change in voltages or build up of resistance due to the fault at the exchange , the phone rang a few times and other people were on the line - i think there was too much voltage on the line because of this new fault and caused my degrading cable (which previously wasnt affecting my broadband) to "fall-over" and become a massive nuisance...I dunno if that's possible but thats what I think happened. this is when the phone become really bad, the next day the engineer dID something at the exchange and the phone went dead and the broadband dropped to 3Mb...like I say it stayed like that for 4 days - then these 3 engineers manage to find the bad bit in cable that was "kicked over" by the fault at the exchange...change the pair in that run which repaired that...then my broadband is back up to 12Mb (round about the same figure after the switch and before phone went dead)

taking into account all that and the fluctuating Upstream Line Attenuation; I think there is still a problem in the exchange...

what do you think?

Hmm...

it's very difficult to say - i'm also no telephone engineer so have no practical experience..

it's not clear exactly what sections of the line have been swapped, nor the exact nature of the work that was undertaken in the exchange.  maybe there was other undocumented work?

wish i could say something useful! good luck with the tier 2 staff at sky, though. There are no doubt some very competent engineers at sky, as with openreach and all other telcos.  Once you've found someone experienced in trouble-shooting, the problem will hopefully soon be solved.

cheers, a
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: asbokid on April 24, 2012, 04:47:54 AM
Fortunately, Snadge has made no secret of his geographical location - Newcastle upon Tyne, hometown of the heavenly Cheryl Cole.

However, with or without Snadge's disclosure, the QLN data from his modem could be used to pin-down his whereabouts..

The very specific narrowband spikes in Snadge's QLN tonemap correspond to noise from RF interference that can be mapped to broadcast frequencies of MW radio stations.

(https://forum.kitz.co.uk/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww3.picturepush.com%2Fphoto%2Fa%2F8109906%2Foimg%2Fsnadge-stats%2Fqln.png&hash=f8e5140656b7c56b1905abc4f363a3bb92a3438f) (http://picturepush.com/public/8109906)

The two largest spikes of noise in the QLN tonemap are at xDSL subcarriers DMT#161 and DMT#267. 

We know that ADSL2+ has channel spacing 4.3125kHz.

So DMT#161 is transmitted between 694.3125kHz and 698.6250kHz
And DMT#267 is transmitted between 1151.4375kHz and 1155.7500kHz

(https://forum.kitz.co.uk/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww1.picturepush.com%2Fphoto%2Fa%2F8109904%2Foimg%2Fsnadge-stats%2Fqln3.png&hash=9973841ae60e41090080693d9062f29fcda6c305) (http://picturepush.com/public/8109904)

We can poke those two frequency ranges into Mark Hattam's excellent web resource, mediumwaveradio.com [1].

From this we can pinpoint that Snadge probably lives in or near one of the following towns: Newcastle, Droitwich or Plymouth.

How so?

From the map below, we can see that those two frequencies (~694kHz and ~1151kHz) are used for medium wave radio broadcasts from transmitters serving those three towns.

It turns out that lucky old Snadge has BBC Radio 5 Live on his doorstep belching out their RF pollution at a whopping 50kW on 693kHz from the Stagshaw MW transmitter.

Snadge also has the pleasure of tiddler AM station, Magic 1152, gracing his QLN graph with the output of their 1800 Watt transmitter at Greenside..

(https://forum.kitz.co.uk/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww1.picturepush.com%2Fphoto%2Fa%2F8109944%2F640%2Fsnadge-stats%2Fsnadge-am2.png&hash=c8667a946f96a50d3249bfea10a20a6d545d4569) (http://picturepush.com/public/8109944)

Fun project there for someone?!  Using QLN data for geo-location?!

cheers, a

[1] http://www.mediumwaveradio.com

Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: Black Sheep on April 24, 2012, 07:14:03 AM
Asbo, sir ......... you are not of this planet. :lol: ;D You belong in another century mate, and I don't mean back in time.

Only jesting of course, I love your posts, I don't understand most of them, but I love them. ;D
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 24, 2012, 09:07:42 PM
bluuurdy hell.... :)  I agree with BS, you are extremely talented!!!    ;)  well impressed!!

yes I live near Blaydon which is a few miles from greenside and I can see the stagshaw one from our house (about 2 miles away)

now you have just got my brain ticking and there is an old black box on wall outside that runs a thick black cable into the soffit where the phone lines are along the whole length - its one of them old radio/TV thingys...cant remember the name , but I never heard of them until the BT engineer pointed it out last week when I asked if he knew what it was, he was shocked that I didnt know about them, had a funny name I thought

now I wonder if its that cable thats picking up the broadcast and running it near the phone lines?  its on my wall too, maybe I could go up and disconnect it? I assuming its no longer used, it must be running along with the phone cables just inches away.

just for info: ive had 2 people from sky call today after a lengthy worded email, a tier 2 rep called Chris has ordered a Line Card change for tomorrow, our phone is off, broadband is still on even though he said it should have went off hours ago, he is calling me back after its done.

then someone called Stanley rang from escalations to say he is monitoring the case from now on and making sure it all gets done and is working, he said if not he can roll back to WLR3 but it means 10 days with no service as its a cease & reprovide.

watch this space....

yeah Im gunna go up there with ladders and open it up that black box and take a look, I will take my Multi-Meter up and see if its live, what do your's reckon?

cheers :)
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: Blackeagle on April 24, 2012, 09:20:20 PM
Its not a Rediffusion box is it ??  If so I doubt its still connected to anything, but it could still be acting as an aerial.
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 24, 2012, 09:22:41 PM
aye thats the one, thanks BE :)

I will take a gander at it tomorrow - it sorta runs under the soffit then into it half way along - as you say it could be coaxing frequencies near it and thus introducing them into my line?  if not, does this mean everyone else will be suffering with this?

thanks
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: Black Sheep on April 24, 2012, 09:33:59 PM
<bluuurdy hell....   I agree with BS, you are extremely talented!!!      well impressed!!>

I suggest we call Asbo, Hannibal Lecter from now on. I daren't tell him my favourite colour for fear he'll track me down, and nick a couple of Huwaei modems off me !! ;D

We still have the Redifusion Cables around our way, I still hear on the grapevine of people with the old selector switch receiving pictures through the actual cable ?? As an OR engineer, we sometimes get urgent safety tasks issued that have been reported as 'Dangerous-cable down', and now and again it will be one of these Redifusion cables that the general public mistake as ours.
Years back, Granada TV took over from Redifusion and we used to pass the issue to them, but as time's gone by even they don't want to know. We just hacksaw through them and make them safe nowadays.
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 24, 2012, 09:39:36 PM
haha - thats exactly what the OR engineer said when I asked him what is was...haha

I will be up there tomorrow having a gander, will they be live at all?
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: Black Sheep on April 24, 2012, 09:44:44 PM
50-50 mate ?? As with all things carrying voltage/current, test your meter against a known souce, then test the actual cable, then retest against the known source. This verifies your meter is working correctly, and the readings you are getting are true.

I'd hate for you to go hacking through some kind of electric supply cable, under the illusion its a Redifusion one. I know this is highly unlikely with your good-self, but for anybody else perusing these forums who may feel the need to go chopping cables down. :) :)
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 24, 2012, 10:36:41 PM
50-50 mate ?? As with all things carrying voltage/current, test your meter against a known souce, then test the actual cable, then retest against the known source. This verifies your meter is working correctly, and the readings you are getting are true.

I'd hate for you to go hacking through some kind of electric supply cable, under the illusion its a Redifusion one. I know this is highly unlikely with your good-self, but for anybody else perusing these forums who may feel the need to go chopping cables down. :) :)

Very True - it has 'rediffusion' on the box, I wont be chopping wires if i can help it - I am hoping I can open it up and simply disconnect any wires and insulate them if live - if it IS live, where will the power be coming from?
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: asbokid on April 24, 2012, 11:08:37 PM
that's nice of both you lads to say!  it's just a bit of fun though, and unfortunately doesn't solve your line fault / broadband fault :-(

i've just been reading a TBB thread from 2008. Some poor blighter reports actually hearing radio 5 live when he does a QLT!

The government proposed turning off AM radio broadcasts some 10 years ago, but didn't pull the plug in the end. Does anyone listen to AM radio any more? Would anyone notice if it was turned off?

The old Economy 7 electricity meters used to receive their switching signal (from economy to 'standard' tariff) via the Radio 4 LW carrier on 198kHz.   Don't suppose that happens any more.  I often wondered whether a radio jammer fired up at the right time would leave the meter charging at the economy rate!

cheers, a
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 24, 2012, 11:12:00 PM
well hopefully tomoz it will get sorted :)

FINGERS CROSSED!!
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: asbokid on April 25, 2012, 12:13:35 AM
well hopefully tomoz it will get sorted :)

FINGERS CROSSED!!

yeah, very best of luck with it!  Please keep us all informed of progress!

cheers, a
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: Ezzer on April 25, 2012, 05:25:48 AM
Black Sheep's advice about checking your meter before checking the errant cable is spot on.

I have come across quite a few situations of voltage that shouldnt be there that lethaly is. From opening a nte only to get a blinding blue flash and the whole house electrics blow (some numpty connected an earth wire from the dowstairs wall lighting to the bell wire and plasterd over the mess) To getting a ruddy huge belt off the MDF in the exchange. I still have the scar from where I got zapped.

Or Black Sheep you'll like this one. Opened a jb23 to find a mc31. Fortunately although it was dark I still could make out electrical terminal screws before I prodded about inside (corroded as it was sopping wet inside) with 6 or 7 13 amp 240v cables inside. Some contractor had got a hold of bt plant and used it to connect the estates lighting and alarm system together.
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 25, 2012, 12:30:34 PM
well.... no joy :(

changed line card and results were still the same :(

luckily, as there was proof I had 18Mb before (even 19Mb at one point) that they are able to send out a Broadband Engineer to find the problem and fix it, he has specialist tools that can locate noise on line and he has full access to the lines and in the exchange so can do anything

he is booked in for Saturday afternoon

I told him it must have been something the first engineer done then - I got those speeds as soon as he messed with the line, he done something at the exchange end cos the phone went off and he wanted access to DP on end house but didnt because there was a dog in the garden, this is what sky rep told me last week, but the lad I just spoke to said there was nothing in his notes?

he said theres no reason the BB specialist engineer wont be able to fix it...but if he doesnt then there is nothing else they can do...which is fair enough...annoying...but at least they tried
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 25, 2012, 08:39:14 PM
...just too add to last post..  Stanley @ Sky escalations rang just now and said he wasnt convinced that the LL14 engineer would fix it, but hopes he does, he says some are good and some are bad BUT he done some more tests and they were all green except for ONE which was red and said "HIGH AM NOISE, POSSIBLE GROUNDING FAULT" - hehehe -  I explained what asbokid told us about the transmitters broadcasting on AM and how the noise spikes are now much more prominent since the switch and that there could be a wire in contact with something that acts as an ariel making the already present noise much worse...  he agree's

he was very nice and helpfull, at first I thought he was gunna cancel the engineer the way he is going on because I was playing about with SNR Margin and got it up to 13,500k with 3.5db SNRM  (2,200k increase) with almost no extra impact on errors and he seen it didnt he.. but he was reading the TARGET SNRM saying it was at 7db @ 13.5Mb... i told him I had been changing the noise margin and its actually at 3db..in an attempt to see what I could tweak it too should the LL14 engineer be unsuccessful at finding the fault - I reset it back to normal to show him it was still 11.3Mb with 7db and he said "ahhh yes, i see... how is it your able to change the noise margin..?" hehe - I told him I use a tool that changes it in my sky router (it is a sky one too, just not sky firmware)

I told him I was very pleased with the efforts that sky have gone to in an attempt to fix it for me even though I am inside the estimated speed they gave me, other providers wouldnt have done that...and he kept saying "thank you for that" - if he cant do it, then he cant do it... I will see if Chris at tier 2 can tweak INP/Interleaving and see if we can squeeze anything more out of it - I dunno if the values lowered will do anything to help (INP=1 / IL=64) and especially if Iam lowering SNR Margin... probably best just leaving it.


so, fingers crossed for Saturday... wished I had some wonga, I would backhand the lad some money if I had it in an attempt to boost his effort, as its likely to be pee'ing down I reckon he will just get sick and call it off (it is Saturday after all)  ..............TEA & BISCUITS  ::)
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: Black Sheep on April 25, 2012, 09:06:39 PM
Black Sheep's advice about checking your meter before checking the errant cable is spot on.

I have come across quite a few situations of voltage that shouldnt be there that lethaly is. From opening a nte only to get a blinding blue flash and the whole house electrics blow (some numpty connected an earth wire from the dowstairs wall lighting to the bell wire and plasterd over the mess) To getting a ruddy huge belt off the MDF in the exchange. I still have the scar from where I got zapped.

Or Black Sheep you'll like this one. Opened a jb23 to find a mc31. Fortunately although it was dark I still could make out electrical terminal screws before I prodded about inside (corroded as it was sopping wet inside) with 6 or 7 13 amp 240v cables inside. Some contractor had got a hold of bt plant and used it to connect the estates lighting and alarm system together.

Wow !! ..... and I truly am gob-smacked at that last paragraph, Ezzer.  :no: :-X :no:

I have to say, I've had the bog-standard DIY'er running a 'Twin & Earth' cable under the carpet, and unwittingly getting that and the telephone cable caught on the gripper rods. Nice little 240Vac contact.

Plus, the scenario where both electric and phone cables have been 'chased' into the wall and plastered over. For some reason they must have been damaged, as again there was 240Vac contact on the phone line.

That's just playground stuff compared to your find in the JB23 !!! PS .... what were you doing working in the dark Ezz ?? If you were using WITHOD, I'll get the CWU to track you down and give you a chinese burn !!  :lol: ;D
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: Black Sheep on April 25, 2012, 09:09:40 PM
"so, fingers crossed for Saturday... wished I had some wonga, I would backhand the lad some money if I had it in an attempt to boost his effort, as its likely to be pee'ing down I reckon he will just get sick and call it off (it is Saturday after all)  ..............TEA & BISCUITS"  

Try not to be too despondent Snadge. 'Tea & Biscuits' ???? ........ Nah mate, bacon & egg butty is the deal-maker.  :P ;D
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 25, 2012, 10:18:39 PM
"so, fingers crossed for Saturday... wished I had some wonga, I would backhand the lad some money if I had it in an attempt to boost his effort, as its likely to be pee'ing down I reckon he will just get sick and call it off (it is Saturday after all)  ..............TEA & BISCUITS"  

Try not to be too despondent Snadge. 'Tea & Biscuits' ???? ........ Nah mate, bacon & egg butty is the deal-maker.  :P ;D

Ive just got some buns in too  8)
soon as he gets here I will invite him in with offer of cuppa while I tell him what happened and tell him about the AM Noise and grounding fault and show him asbokids graphs and about the masts etc... (thanks asbokid)

BS - i dunno if you will know (coolsnakeman will) - im unsure as to what tests he performs.. but if that fault (HIGH AM NOISE ON LINE, POSSIBLE GROUNDING FAULT) comes up wouldnt it warrant an engineer visit anyway? as today Chris @ tier 2 arranged for the LL14 engineer to come out , but said he could only do so if my line tests ok - so Im assuming he run those same tests, how come he didnt get that error/fault result? I asked why it had to come back clean and he said because if its a line fault it goes to a field engineer - it must have been a line test he done but what test did this other guy do at escalations? - Iam wondering if he was just saying "yes thats passed..all ok" so that it went down on recorded conversation as tested OK...but actually he did see that fault and perhaps thought the LL14 would be able to deal with it better? so just went against protocol? hmmm dunno...
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: Ezzer on April 26, 2012, 12:46:49 AM
"That's just playground stuff compared to your find in the JB23 !!! PS .... what were you doing working in the dark Ezz ?? If you were using WITHOD, I'll get the CWU to track you down and give you a chinese burn !!"

Failing light with a couple of other customers with problem lines on top of my eu. It was a warden assisted senior estate. The JB23 was in a grassy area inbetween rows of bungalows away from the pavement.  Always remember a similar estate in another town. A dis, located the fault. someone (never found out who) had dug a big hole by the side of the road and obviously discovered some cable and thought whoops and scarpered. (100pr concentric). So the whole block was off. One of the residence needed an ambulance the night before. Nobodys phone worked, The nearby phone boxes were off. And being the demographic in that area no one had mobiles. So someone flagged down a passing car to call 999 
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: Black Sheep on April 26, 2012, 07:24:40 AM
"so, fingers crossed for Saturday... wished I had some wonga, I would backhand the lad some money if I had it in an attempt to boost his effort, as its likely to be pee'ing down I reckon he will just get sick and call it off (it is Saturday after all)  ..............TEA & BISCUITS"  

Try not to be too despondent Snadge. 'Tea & Biscuits' ???? ........ Nah mate, bacon & egg butty is the deal-maker.  :P ;D

Ive just got some buns in too  8)
soon as he gets here I will invite him in with offer of cuppa while I tell him what happened and tell him about the AM Noise and grounding fault and show him asbokids graphs and about the masts etc... (thanks asbokid)

BS - i dunno if you will know (coolsnakeman will) - im unsure as to what tests he performs.. but if that fault (HIGH AM NOISE ON LINE, POSSIBLE GROUNDING FAULT) comes up wouldnt it warrant an engineer visit anyway? as today Chris @ tier 2 arranged for the LL14 engineer to come out , but said he could only do so if my line tests ok - so Im assuming he run those same tests, how come he didnt get that error/fault result? I asked why it had to come back clean and he said because if its a line fault it goes to a field engineer - it must have been a line test he done but what test did this other guy do at escalations? - Iam wondering if he was just saying "yes thats passed..all ok" so that it went down on recorded conversation as tested OK...but actually he did see that fault and perhaps thought the LL14 would be able to deal with it better? so just went against protocol? hmmm dunno...

Quick reply here ......

'Grounding' is what we always call 'Earthing' in the OR world. Now, depending on the severity on the 'Earth contact' depends on what the remote testers 'see'.
I know our CSS test system (RAT -- Remote Automed Test) only shows values of Insulation Resistance up to a maximum of 1Meg Ohm, no matter how good the resistance is. Digital circuits should always be above 5Meg Ohm, but as I say. the system hasn't been upgraded to show that yet.

So, back to your problem, our RAT test will perceive anything below 500Kohm (1/2 Meg Ohm) between the live and neutral legs (A&B legs) to Earth, as a fault. My caveat on this is I've personally had tests as low as 200Kohm and still come back as a LTOK (Line Tests OK).

Sky will have to access TAMS to perform their own test on your circuit, so you could ask your advisor that you're dealing with, what the complete test results were, not just the summary. Adios for now. Work beckons.
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 26, 2012, 09:37:33 AM
just too let you all know I get up this morning and line atten down is up to 31db, speed is mere 6Mb and loads of CRC errors...  it would appear there is still a major fault on the line that has redeveloped...  sigh!! lol....

I have told Chris at sky via email but I wonder if its best waiting for LL14 on Sat or will it have to go to field engineer (bearing in mind 5 visits to the exchange have been done and still they could not fix it)

SF  = 3965390   CRC = 26319  <- this is from 5 emails and 2 webpage views
LOS = 41  LOF = 238   ES = 607

(https://forum.kitz.co.uk/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg715.imageshack.us%2Fimg715%2F3060%2Fscreenhunter06apr261040.jpg&hash=bed05576d0694762ff37e122d47542e91319c123)
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: coolsnakeman on April 26, 2012, 11:00:09 AM
"so, fingers crossed for Saturday... wished I had some wonga, I would backhand the lad some money if I had it in an attempt to boost his effort, as its likely to be pee'ing down I reckon he will just get sick and call it off (it is Saturday after all)  ..............TEA & BISCUITS"  

Try not to be too despondent Snadge. 'Tea & Biscuits' ???? ........ Nah mate, bacon & egg butty is the deal-maker.  :P ;D

Ive just got some buns in too  8)
soon as he gets here I will invite him in with offer of cuppa while I tell him what happened and tell him about the AM Noise and grounding fault and show him asbokids graphs and about the masts etc... (thanks asbokid)

BS - i dunno if you will know (coolsnakeman will) - im unsure as to what tests he performs.. but if that fault (HIGH AM NOISE ON LINE, POSSIBLE GROUNDING FAULT) comes up wouldnt it warrant an engineer visit anyway? as today Chris @ tier 2 arranged for the LL14 engineer to come out , but said he could only do so if my line tests ok - so Im assuming he run those same tests, how come he didnt get that error/fault result? I asked why it had to come back clean and he said because if its a line fault it goes to a field engineer - it must have been a line test he done but what test did this other guy do at escalations? - Iam wondering if he was just saying "yes thats passed..all ok" so that it went down on recorded conversation as tested OK...but actually he did see that fault and perhaps thought the LL14 would be able to deal with it better? so just went against protocol? hmmm dunno...

Ok with this being LLU sky have there own systems to test SVBN so they would be using systems completely different from BT. One of the tests i remember was a SELT test which i can't remember what it actually stands for anymore lol. From what i remember this tests from the bar pair (CLT card) at the exchange through the entire network. Yes my friendly engineers sky call the CLT card the bar pair which is fitted onto port 16 i think on the DSLAM or MSAN for SVBN or is it the line card i always get mixed up lol. So when they say they are finding something coming up as "red" it means the test is flagging a part of the network as faulty. Not to sure but i think they still use openreach's website to run a copper line test (CAT) on there SVBN network so that could easily test ok where as the SELT could fail. Don't ask me what CAT actually stands for cause again the years i worked for sky i never thought to ask but i knew what it was for. Hope this helps.

Gary
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 26, 2012, 11:48:07 AM
thanks Gary

you see my latest post above yours?

back to sq 1 today with phone and broadband is much worse and wont hold sync...its hard to post

my burfday today too... :(

LL14 engineer rebooked for tomoz morning - he agree's he may be better trained to sort it as he will be trained to do phone and broadband and has full access
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: asbokid on April 26, 2012, 01:26:56 PM
just too let you all know I get up this morning and line atten down is up to 31db, speed is mere 6Mb and loads of CRC errors...  it would appear there is still a major fault on the line that has redeveloped...  sigh!! lol....

I have told Chris at sky via email but I wonder if its best waiting for LL14 on Sat or will it have to go to field engineer (bearing in mind 5 visits to the exchange have been done and still they could not fix it)

SF  = 3965390   CRC = 26319  <- this is from 5 emails and 2 webpage views
LOS = 41  LOF = 238   ES = 607

(https://forum.kitz.co.uk/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg715.imageshack.us%2Fimg715%2F3060%2Fscreenhunter06apr261040.jpg&hash=bed05576d0694762ff37e122d47542e91319c123)

Many happy returns of the day, snadge! It looks likes someone has given you the broadband bumps though  :o

DMT is once again saying funny things.. It's only showing the tones for ADSL(1)... up to DMT#256.. whereas you have an ADSL2+ connection so we should be seeing 512 tones..

If the other DMT stats are more reliable, they show that your loop attenuation has gone up from (at best) ~-20dB on April 21st to (at best) ~-35dB today, April 26th.

The SNRs for the DMTs we can see, those up to DMT#256, are high enough to support much better bit-loading that you are currently getting.   Explaining perhaps why the RCO (relative capacity occupation) ratios are so low (just 40% RCO for downstream). This is presumably an effect of dynamic line management?

Sounds like you're getting some good attention from Sky and Openreach.  Here's hoping they will burst the boil on your broadband!

cheers, a




Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 26, 2012, 03:01:14 PM
Hi asbokid,

when did I have 20db downtream LA..?  do you mean 26db? I dont think its ever been below 26db which is where it should be...  Iam certain that there are two faults here, one the first engineer has caused (picking up rein), and a battery contact up this end due to the rain, either in that cable from my DP to end house' DP  ..or... in the duct around the corner as its filled with water, they installed that not long ago and its at the bottom of a verge off the field and the field has had problems with drainage, we all had 1 foot of rain water in gardens coming off field 3 years back and had to resort to sand-bagging to stop it.. the council put in some drainage which worked , but it seems to be clogged up on the field again as its like walking in a puddle over the whole field (although its not coming down onto our lawns again)

so I think the battery contact is actually in there and reason it worked after last engineer is because he fished out all the water before testing my line (as did the one before him, tested LOTK, but later on it came back)...  but there is still a fault somewhere that has the contact (grounding fault) thats picking up the AM noise...even sky's system picked that up last night.

Iam now in ADSL2+ mode but still same upto 256 bins.. maybe cos DMT see's theres nothing on the above bins it wont display them?

new stats:
I have not been using it either other than few emails and messages on forum

SF  = 4815999   CRC = 37875
LOS = 78   LOF = 483   ES = 652


(https://forum.kitz.co.uk/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg850.imageshack.us%2Fimg850%2F2905%2Fscreenhunter06apr261459.jpg&hash=a0098a753c8a288a735317720af52ee65a95c272)
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: coolsnakeman on April 26, 2012, 05:19:14 PM
Snadge,

Yeah i seen your post and def not looking good at all. Fingers and toes are crossed for you mate on tomorrows visit i hope this engineer has the wit to go out of his way to get this sorted for you. Happy b/day mate hope you where able to salvage the day from all the problems you have been having with that curse of a broadband service of yours.

Gary

P.s did kitz take the emoticon off that was of a wee man with a party hat on or did he never have that lol
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: asbokid on April 27, 2012, 12:49:18 AM
when did I have 20db downtream LA..?  do you mean 26db?

Hi snadge.

Sorry, I didn't word it properly.. what i meant to say was that on the 21st April, the least attenuated subcarriers were recording roughly -20dB of attenuation. They were the DMTs around 300kHz. But by the 26th April, the lowest attenuation level of any subcarrier had risen to roughly -35dB..

-20dB to -35dB (a logarithmic scale) is a considerable rise in attenuation. As a power ratio it's about 30 times more attenuation..

Quote
I am now in ADSL2+ mode but still same upto 256 bins.. maybe cos DMT see's theres nothing on the above bins it wont display them?

DMT is reporting that it is synced in G992.5 ADSL2+, albeit at ADSL1 speeds and with an ADSL1 tonemap.. But can that be clarified elsewhere - ie via adslctl?

DMT doesn't seem very accurate. Kitz and I questioned whether it may have wrongly reported that you were on Annex M with O2/Be*, and coloured the bitloading graph based on that error.  It's possible that it's wrongly reporting here that you're synced at ADSL2+..

Either way, crossed fingers for tomorrow!

cheers, a
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 27, 2012, 09:40:37 AM
LL14 engineer is not here yet, but weve had no rain all night and its a bit drier and the attenuation has dropped a bit (changes on each reboot), and able to hold a stable(ish) connection @ 6-9Mb

DMT Tool was reporting the correct sync as I was checking it against the router connection stats - just goes too show how screwed my line is, its sunny and no rain, im hoping it holds out so the engineer isnt working in rain and gets sick n calls it off.

This morning the router would not get an IP until I spoofed my sagem's mac address into my Netgear GT -  WIERD, because I have been using it without a spoofed mac address for weeks now.
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: coolsnakeman on April 27, 2012, 09:55:20 AM
This morning the router would not get an IP until I spoofed my sagem's mac address into my Netgear GT -  WIERD, because I have been using it without a spoofed mac address for weeks now.

ooooooo sky are onto you with a flashed router  >:D loll Was your appointment an AM slot time cause if it was he has up to 1pm to get to you  ;D

Gary
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 27, 2012, 10:05:20 AM
yeah it was...  :)

is the system automatic at detecting flashed routers or do they manually force new IP..? seems odd it would just happen this morning..seems automatic, I have always used mac spoof but i took it off weeks ago just to test it and it worked...then i was moved onto a diff line card 48 hours ago without re-enabling the mac spoof..
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: coolsnakeman on April 27, 2012, 12:14:29 PM
Snadge,

Not to sure if sky can actually detect a flashed router or not. I come across customers years ago when working for sky that had flashed routers the only reason i knew this was because they put there username as something fairly nasty towards sky. Off course seeing the fact that it was abusive towards sky and that it was flashed i refused to troubleshoot there issues and actually advised them they could be cut off due to being in breach of contract. I have a flashed sky sagem in the house which i think the sagem firmware is pretty good :). I also looked into flashing an o2 router but gave up the minute i had to do anything physical with the router cause it is the jtag i think you call it that gets flashed. I could take the time to build the tool that is needed to flash that router but i don't know if i could be bothered lol. That engineer turned up yet?

Gary
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 27, 2012, 04:12:39 PM
hi Gary

a flashed 2504N..? I wouldnt mind an unlocked one of those because its a good router... (I have one...but not unlocked)

anyway, he's been and NO JOY... because it went from being a BROADBAND DIAG job to a LINE REPAIR (HR Fault) job he has had to spend 4 fours installing a new run of cable to the end DP...broadband is still same with noise, i told him there were 2 issues when he got here and he wasnt convinced...he was by time he left!!

here is copy of email to SKY:

Quote
Hi Chris,

Got a problem, we should have booked a Field engineer out for the HR Fault that returned on the line and left the broadband engineer for Saturday, because he has had to spend 4 hours replacing cable just to get the phone back on that he has not had time to pursue the broadband fault; which is noise on the line - I have DMT SNR-per-tone graphs showing it, before (fine on 18Mb)...and after when its noisy (which I showed the engineer).

The engineer said that because his boss was on his case to get too another job that he could not stay around, I asked if an engineer came the day before and done what he did (which he should have because broadband engineers are only bookable on a clean line, which mine wasn't) what would he have done? he said he would be testing it in the cabinets with his JDSU all the way down to the exchange but he has not got the time to do it.

He was convinced that SKY may be applying some ‘cap’ but I know you aren't as I am 1150k up (20Mb profile) and I showed him the DMT SNR scans of the ADSL2+ frequency (before and after) which shows noise on the line suddenly more prominent after the first fault happened after the switch over, the graphs show two lots of AM noise spikes on the line, when I was switched over the speed was ok (17.5Mb), it was the next day when engineer went out (after his work) too fix the “crossed wire” that the AM noise came on the line and speed dropped to 11Mb ... this is what I told the engineer, between all the attempted repairs by BTopenreach the speed has remained at 11Mb, this is how I know there is a secondary issue.

He said if he could be re-booked he would certainly look into it, but because there was an outstanding HR Fault (Line Issue) that the job has fallen back onto repairing that rather than fault-finding for the broadband.

The noise is still prevalent and being introduced into the line, where it wasn’t before the 1st engineers visit at the exchange/cab.

What's your take on all this Chris?  I think that given the fact that a line fault occurred after the booking of the Broadband Engineer I think that a Field Engineer should have been booked to repair that HR Fault – then the broadband engineer to diagnose that (the problem engineer no.1 has caused).

Look forward to your replies.

Regards,

Paul
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: burakkucat on April 27, 2012, 04:20:42 PM
 :doh:  D'oh!
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: coolsnakeman on April 27, 2012, 05:31:27 PM
Snadge,

Pitch a tent and get your mashmallows out this is going to be a long one lol.

Gary
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 27, 2012, 05:36:40 PM
ive given up

is this fixed (2 hours stats)

Total time = 2hours 43min 17sec
SF  = 516330   CRC = 973
LOS = 2   LOF = 18   ES = 39

getn sticky unresponsive pages at times

can the 2504N (sky firmware) dish out error stats?

oh and a neighbour on sky has same issues too, phone issues but broadband still works (although they dunno or care about speed) think they may have been on same cable, DP & DUCT
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 27, 2012, 06:24:45 PM
....also, when  he left we were getting 13,700k sync (2Mb increase) - even between reboots, I could get it too 16Mb with 3db SNRM so was pleased a bit - then - she uses phone and its now back down to 11Mb...even between reboots... how is that possible?  it was fine until she called out?
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 27, 2012, 07:24:40 PM
engineer no.6 (special noisey lines engineer) coming tomoz afternoon...lol... he hinted that they may send another Bband one out again if needs be but has to come a point when they stop spending money...fair do's...  we had quite a laugh on phone actually...

I said to BT Engineer no.5 today that "by time all this is done and finished, I will know more about the lines in this street than BT" and the guy said "aye you can be the consultant...just send them too no.1 and he will give you a background on it" he he he
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 28, 2012, 02:36:58 PM
well, noisey line engineer cant do owt cos he is just for crackling noise on line... I need a broadband specialist he says and agrees that lad yesterday should of done both jobs....

he is gunna change my e-side wiring to see if that helps but Iam not confident tho...

EDIT: yup, it has not changed anything , changed the E-side pair from cab to exchange (same cable different pair) and results are exactly same, he did say he found a small problem down that end but its now removed..however my noise issue (broadband noise problems, not phone 'audible' noise) remains

I will bounce it back to sky, he did say that when he calls me on Monday they will decide then whether or not they will send another broadband engineer, so there is a glimmer of hope yet..but extremely unlikely

the really annoying thing is , after the engineer finished yesterday we got 13.7Mb on 7db..I was able to push that to 16Mb with little error impact...I was happy with that, it stayed even between reboots as I messed with it - then she used the phone one hour later and the speed dropped back to 11Mb after she hung up..   thats when I emailed sky about it - so i had a potentially 14-16Mb line, now Im back to 11-13Mb again...argghh!!

Its starting to affect my health too, yesterday the engineer said that I need to be carefull as I may get charged (and he is right) , however, since he said that I have been worried sick and its causing me anxiety making me feel unwell, if only it would go back up to 13.7Mb again I would be happyso I could tweak it to 16Mb, christ I had 13Mb on a 39db line, I cant even get 12Mb on a 26db line..says a lot doesnt it!

looks like Im just gunna have to absorb the loss in speed - sky have bent over backwards to help, cant fault them (apart from a couple of comms hiccups), the rep said there has to come a point when they have to stop spending money on it because they wont recuperate it, however, all these visits have been faulty line visits and costs should be absorbed by BTo which is what the engineer said, sky told me they were charged £300 for yesterdays visit....hmmm....

dont BTo engineers have tools that show/tell them the AM noise on the line and help locate it?  the JDSU only seems to show max attainable rates INCLUSIVE of the noise on the line - sky has a tool that says there is high am noise on the line, possible grounding fault, my router shows me the loss of SNR over the frequencies... surely BTo have something that says "yes, there is AM noise on this run of cable" and they can test various sections of cable down to and into the exchange? ...surely?  sky rep said they did but the BB engineer just fixed the HR Fault and fled with excuses (pressure from boss) when he was supposed to do BOTH jobs (Fix HR Fault and Diagnose AM Noise), he said he couldnt coax anymore speed out of the line but he hadnt even tried too?? he was going of the JDSU max attain rate which is inclusive of the noise on the line....im starting to wonder if its the MSAN (phone port) absorbing the rein..? as its been since the switch over this has happened, I have been put into another line card but still the same...i dunno if that means the phone was moved too, probably not, so the phone could still be in same card and port??? could it??  I may ask my neighbour who is also on sky if i can use my GT to scan her SNR over the tones and see if she has same problem
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: coolsnakeman on April 30, 2012, 10:05:41 AM
Snadge,

So sky are saying they are not going to send out anymore engineers due to cost. So they are bascially admitting to not being able to resolve your fault which puts you into a position of power to get out of the contract due to technical issues. I would certainly have a read over your T&C in regards to this cause there will be a part there that will state wither you can get out of a contract without getting hit with early charges if sky are unable to resolve a fault. It would need to be the tech team though to request the cancellation in order for this to happen. This fault can be resolved if pressure is applied by your service provider to have this escalated to a field manager. Sky certainly do not pay the costs of an engineer if the fault is found to be on the network they will only pay the costs of an engineer if the fault is found with there own kit like your router, filter, DSL cable and internal wiring etc so i certainly would not believe the £300 cost and if that did happen it would be down to sky to dispute that charge and show that the fault was found on the network and not with the end users own equipment. Don't lie down and take any of this your service needs and deserves to be restored back to what it was you where paying for so you can make that happen by playing your cards right and building your ammo.

Gary
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: Black Sheep on April 30, 2012, 12:28:38 PM
dont BTo engineers have tools that show/tell them the AM noise on the line and help locate it?  the JDSU only seems to show max attainable rates INCLUSIVE of the noise on the line - sky has a tool that says there is high am noise on the line, possible grounding fault, my router shows me the loss of SNR over the frequencies... surely BTo have something that says "yes, there is AM noise on this run of cable" and they can test various sections of cable down to and into the exchange? ...surely?  sky rep said they did but the BB engineer just fixed the HR Fault and fled with excuses (pressure from boss) when he was supposed to do BOTH jobs (Fix HR Fault and Diagnose AM Noise), he said he couldnt coax anymore speed out of the line but he hadnt even tried too?? he was going of the JDSU max attain rate which is inclusive of the noise on the line....im starting to wonder if its the MSAN (phone port) absorbing the rein..? as its been since the switch over this has happened, I have been put into another line card but still the same...i dunno if that means the phone was moved too, probably not, so the phone could still be in same card and port??? could it??  I may ask my neighbour who is also on sky if i can use my GT to scan her SNR over the tones and see if she has same problem

Sky haven't got a tool that says there is AM noise on the line. If they have actually said that, they're lying. The only way to determine if that is the case is by using an oscilloscope, or a Spectrum Analyser plugged into your line. Carrying out a low-frequency test remotely, which is ALL the ISP's can do, will not show AM Noise.

I've said before on one of your posts snadge, they may use the term 'grounding', but the term is 'earthing' that we use. This will be picked up on a low frequency remote test. Having said that, the plethora of engineers and all the PQT and Eclipse tests would also have picked up a 'earth' condition if there was one.

Believe me, if the MSAN was picking up REIN, then the whole Exchange would be susceptible. I doubt this is the case, very much so.
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on April 30, 2012, 12:55:24 PM
Hi Gary,

Well, I dunno... he did say last week that once the NL engineer been out that they would re-asses and decide if a Broadband Engineer needs sending out again, however I have since found that 2 neighbours are with sky, one is WLR3 and one is SVBN MSAN and guess what!! - the WLR3 neighbour has perfect healthy line like mine was and the SVBN MSAN neighbours has absolutely terrible line noise (worse than mine) she only gets 6Mb and the two AM noise spikes are present on her line too, I emailed Chris @ sky and presented him with my findings and I also said Iam going to test a neighbour who is on BT just for good measure to see if its the DP on end of our row, if his line is clear then it would show that its likely sky's msan that is absorbing noise/interference into the line -- I told Chris this and he replied saying he has passed my findings on to the Network Team who will check the possibility of radio frequencies affecting their equipment in the exchange and will report back as soon as he has an update.

I showed him the before and after pictures of my line, I have screenshots of neighbours too (well, I accidentally overwrote one neighbours with the other ...lol..I can get it again though if needed for evidence) - I told the WLR3 neighbour she would get a letter soon saying she is being moved onto SVBN and when she does too let me know so I can re-check her line.

so we'll see what happens... I need to find out how to set up my GT to work with a BT Broadband connection so I can run the tests on my other neighbours line.

@ Black Sheep - Hi mate, well, sky said they have their own internal testing kit but BTopenreach dont care for results from it as they only go off their own tests, the test that is picking up the AM noise is not a live test but runs taking 'snapshots' at various points in time and keeps results over last 7 weeks, last time it had a result when the phone line was working perfectly fine it said "HIGH AM NOISE ON LINE, POSSIBLE GROUNDING FAULT" and that was the only test out of the lot that was flagging up - it was the escalations team rep who first brought my attention to the test & result, I asked Chris about it and he told me what I just said about snapshots and BTo not caring for results from their testing kit and why it cant be used as evidence to BTo too say "look, their is AM noise on the line" - you've probably read my other findings about the SKY WLR3 neighbour not being affected but the SKY MSAN neighbour IS affected, yet I wasnt affected when I was on WLR3....seems a bit suss.. there is the possibility that it may be the DP on the end of my row and the cable from it to the duct, but I dunno - we'll find out when I test my other neighbour who is on BT because if the fault is in that or the cable then he should be susceptible to it also as I have had pairs swapped from that DP to the duct and still the same

Remember the Upstream Line Attenuation was bouncing all over the place too, so something aint right with their hardware by the sounds of it

as for costs etc: its not my fault it took 5 visits to find and repair an HR Fault in the line and sky should not be getting charged as you say...so "technically" sky aint spent all the money he is making out, he said "there has to come a point when we stop spending money on it as we wont recuperate the costs" which is true IF you are being charged for every visit - I made a point of telling him that we spend £537 per year on SKY services and have been with sky for 6 years already
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 01, 2012, 09:06:00 PM
well... I tested the neighbour thats on BT and guess what... perfect line, he has lower line speed due to high SNRM and heavy interleaving as he uses long extension cables and has internal wiring etc so is inviting problems, but the SNR graph showed no problems with his line, nice smooth contours with the odd gap - this shows that its not the DP or cable on the end of our row...otherwise its very likely he would be affected too.

it seems to me that its the Telephony side of sky's  "Broadband & Phone" (SVBN) MSAN at the exchange, this is because when I was on WLR3 my broadband was ported onto a "Broadband only" MSAN instead of the 'Easynet' Dslam and my phone was routed through WLR3 (BTw) and my connection was spot on, the other sky neighbour who is also on WLR3 is having no issues either - then when they moved me off WLR3/Broadband MSAN to a full "broadband & phone" (SVBN) MSAN I had these interference problems and my other neighbour is also on the SVBN MSAN has the same interference spikes in graph and is even worse than mine - could this mean its either that MSAN or sky's telephony networking in/beyond it? Ive had a Line Card switch with same results so it aint the Line Card.

as you can see from graph below (BT Broadband) he does not have the 'spikes' from radio stations like me and the other SVBN neighbour does, if he got rid of his internal wiring problems and got the SNRM lowered he would have a decent line.

(https://forum.kitz.co.uk/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg11.imageshack.us%2Fimg11%2F4103%2Fscreenhunter06may012102.jpg&hash=4d701ffecde882a7ee30ede8ee6143597409ab81)
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: Blackeagle on May 01, 2012, 09:27:10 PM
So snadge, when you were on SMPF, your broadband was fine, but moving to full LLU caused you these issues.  Is that correct ?
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 01, 2012, 09:38:19 PM
So snadge, when you were on SMPF, your broadband was fine, but moving to full LLU caused you these issues.  Is that correct ?

Hi BA,

yeah...

when I was on SMPF my phone was WLR3 and my broadband was on a 'Broadband Only' MSAN (I dunno why it wasnt on easynet Dslam, but it wasnt) - I had no issues, 18Mb connection speed - soon as they changed me over to MPF (broadband AND phone MSAN) I had this problem... and like I say a neighbour who has just signed up with sky is on SMPF and does not have any problems and no noise spikes on the line from radio stations MAGIC and RADIO 5 LIVE , nice healthy line like mine was on SMPF - but another neighbour 2 doors down who is also on sky MPF (broadband and phone MSAN) has the same noise issues as me, infact hers are worse but I cant comment on her internal conditions, however on the SNR graphs I can still see the two afore mentioned radio stations bleeding heavily into her line too...

so thats shows 2 customers that were on SMPF were fine and now 2 customers who are on MPF are not.

when the new customer gets switched and the problem is not resolved I will be over there like a shot to test her line to see if she is the same...im putting money on it!
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: Blackeagle on May 02, 2012, 07:24:19 PM
Certainly seems you are getting some evidence together that would seem to support your theory.
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 02, 2012, 08:18:56 PM
aye... ive not heard from the rep for a few days now...he may be off so I will give it a bit more time before I begin to assume if they are just forgetting about me...
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: coolsnakeman on May 04, 2012, 02:47:58 PM
This can be placed as a common issue then cause its the exact same issue in the same area. I would search more evidence from all your neighbours that are on WLR3 aswell as SVBN then get the ones that are having issues to contact sky about it. The more you have call sky the better the chance you will have of getting this resolved cause they will have to fix it if it is causing major issues in your entire area. You could also gather ticket REF numbers from those neighbours that have reported there issues then drop sky an email or call them with all the ticket numbers. Sky will have a major faults team they can pass all the details onto and get it investigated cause it could be an issue with there entire kit at that exchange and it might need all swapped out which is going to be a big job. Problem is sky are not going to do anything fancy if it is just 1 or 2 customers reporting the issue so you may have to get about 10 of your neighbours onboard with this.

Gary
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 04, 2012, 02:56:49 PM
aye thanks Gary, well I have 1 neighbour ON svbn and one who will be sometime in coming weeks perhaps, we live in a part of the estate where its all old folk in bungelows , I know one or two people in the next street, they may know someone who is with sky nearby that I can ask if i can check their lines hehe

its a sham - my only option to get it sorted is to be put back on WLR3 but ive been told it means 10 days with no service!!! surely something can be arranged so that we have some sort of broadband whilst the change takes place..? even if its mobile...?
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: coolsnakeman on May 04, 2012, 03:01:08 PM
I would of thought they would of kept you on SVBN until the switch back to WLR3 then cancel your SVBN so you don't have a loss of service. Bit of a back to front way of doing things but i guess that most be there policy. Have you got alot of RES homes in your area cause the more reporting the better. You have come this far with it no point in giving up just yet mate i would suggest you gather more evidence and then hit sky with it all at one go. They will surely have to spend the money then to get it repaired with no complaints  ;D

Gary
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 04, 2012, 03:22:23 PM
what are RES homes..?

I know I dont want too give up but its really grinding on me - when it went up to 13.7Mb and I could get 16Mb on 3.5db I was happy with that.. it stayed there between reboots too - but as soon as she phoned her gran and I reboot the router after that call the speed dropped back down to 11.2Mb again...grrr!!  defo problematic hardware in exchange.

Iam going to ask the people who I walk the dog with if they know anyone on sky, thing is 99% of people couldnt give a toss about speeds and wont be willing to complain unless their service was degraded to the point its crap - the lady 2 doors down is hit hard and hers is slooww!! and she said she will complain. she gets 6Mb sync on a 27db line... brilliant eh? she should be getting 16Mb-18Mb sync - the lady on WLR3 was 27db too but she was in middle of 10 day training and her connection was already up to 12.2Mb ...so she is beating us already and her DLM aint even finished, she got activated on Thursday and this was Sunday, so
thu - 4Mb
fri - 6Mb
sat -9Mb
sun - 12Mb
makes sense...exactly how mine happened but continued to 15Mb and stayed there (cos DLM is tight), then i got it shunted up to 18Mb..
her line was healthy on DMT and no reason she shouldnt be on 15Mb+ right now , DLM probably stopped at 12Mb because of me shoving my router on for 10 minutes thinking it was a dropout ..lol...
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: kitz on May 05, 2012, 03:16:27 PM
>> I would of thought they would of kept you on SVBN until the switch back to WLR3 then cancel your SVBN

Sky seem to have a backwards way of doing things.  They use their own engineers to work on their own MSANs and will only book a sky engineer when they know BTo has carried out their side of things.

Ive come across this causing delays a few times around here.  My daughter was badly affected because of their weird system of doing things and ended up being without adsl for the  best part of a month. By the time BTo did their bit.. acknowledged it to sky.. then they booked the sky MSAN engineer (who only visits her exchange on Tuesdays) it was a right PITA.:(

>> what are RES homes..?

RESidential ?
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 05, 2012, 03:25:04 PM
so they can do this SVBN to WLR3 switch back with no downtime (or very little)?

I still aint heard from the reps and I have posted on forum again and still no contact to tell me whats going on with Networking Team, i dont think they are even doing anything - I think his manager has just said to fake it in hope I will give up

been nearly a week since I got an email and I have sent a reply since!!

really am fed up and irritated...iam so annoyed I went with sky, they are crap!! simple as that, I had read about their SVBN causing problems and losing peoples speed and thats why I asked if I could opt out... look what happened...my neighbour gets 6Mb on a 18Mb capable line , I see COUNTLESS other sky members on their forums getting crap speeds because of the rubbish DLM system thats flawed!! - I made a BIG MISTAKE moving from o2/BE to SKY ...BIG MISTAKE!!!
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 09, 2012, 04:10:55 AM
well. no news yet - other than other day he said the Networking Team have not picked it up yet and Iam not priority as I have working broadband, I asked about going back to WLR3 and can they do it without downtime and he said I could go back to WLR3 as a last resort but will have "matter of days" downtime... this was on Saturday evening, its been 9 days since he submitted a request to network team too look into it.

more problems? -> at the weekend I turned on PC saturday morning to find that my sync was at 3Mb again but this time there were massive sections of tones missing in DMT Map, 2 huge blocks actually...i wished i took a screenshot!! but rebooted fixed the sync but since then the upstream noise margin is fluctuating again???
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: coolsnakeman on May 09, 2012, 03:38:51 PM
For the record RES means residential so yeah your right kitz lol. Just easier to type RES. What i was asking is if there is alot of RES houses around where you are i am assuming there is cause of your line condition i can't really see you being out in the sticks (as the crow flies). Perhaps your problem is not of great concern to them because you have a working service but this is a reason for you gathering this information from your neighbours on SVBN and getting them ALL to report faults with there broadband service. If sky see that coming through they will soon enough pick up the speed in getting this resolved. I understand alot of the residents in your area do not care much for technology and broadband speeds but that is only really because they don't understand any of it so try putting it across to them in money talk. Explain to them that they are paying over the odds for a service they are not even getting and just watch them dive across the room to pick the phone up and call sky. Again obtain there ticket id and gather at least 10-20 ticket id's to go back to sky with. Once you produce that evidence sit back, relax, drink some coffee or beer and smoke a cigarette if your a smoker and watch how quick your issue gets dealt with.

Gary
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 09, 2012, 03:47:46 PM
@ Gary - hehe yer right too...  8)  I will speak to the one neighbour , she said she would "would have a word" with them if I wanted her too after I fixed her dell laptop for free, like I say since the weekend and something happened to my connection the line attenuation (upstream) has started to fluctuate again, although not as bad as before, infact right now its back to 15.3db which is what it was at before...
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 19, 2012, 12:13:50 AM
well sky have fobbed me off, closed my case saying the hardware in exchange is congested and will take 10 weeks to upgrade and this may or may not resolve my problems, its obvious it wont as over-subbing does not cause massive increase of noise on the line.  also sky's checker says my exchange is fine AND latency and throughput have been 100% perfect at peak times....sounds like rubbish to me

this was the reply i sent back:

Quote
Hi Chris,
 
Thanks for your email, as always I really appreciate your help.
 
Sky’s exchange status checker says my exchange is just fine? and it has been for me..no throughput issues which is typical of an over-subscribed exchange?, latency and throughput have been ok as I test them regularly at peak times.
 
Personally, I think over-subscribing is unlikely to be the cause of the extra noise on the line, which is the cause of my massive loss in sync-rate.
 (just to add, I tested an old couples sky line in next estate last night and they had the same AM noise spikes, but, had much less ‘general’ noise on the line).
 
I think it best Chris if we just forget about the whole thing and accept it as it is.... but we would really appreciate it if we could be given some form of financial compensation for the loss of service and massive inconvenience it has been to us with all the problems we have had with communication with sky (before you came on board of course) , having to be in for 6 engineers to get our phone line repaired after the switch, the stress from it all which really has had an effect on me at every stage of the problem when attempts to fix the phone and/or broadband have been un-successful..and having to argue the toss with the Broadband Engineer who refused to stay and try and resolve the problem, I think you can agree when you look at our case as a whole that we have been through a lot and at the end of it we are no further forward, I mean its got so bad that now when I see sky calling I am ‘scared’ to answer the phone because I know its going to be bad news and its going to stress me out?, shouldn't have gotten like that.
 
I honestly don't think this upgrade will make an ounce of difference and that in 10 weeks time I am certain we will still have the same troubles (BTopenreach engineers and ISP reps on the various forums I use agree also.)
 
Sky promised me (when I asked to opt out of the switch to SVBN) that if my broadband speed suffered they would fix it, they have failed to do so , I just want to close the case and get on with it and forget about it, its one less stress I could do without, but I only think it would be fair to do so if we had some sort of financial compensation for our problems and everything we have been through with it.
 
Can this be arranged Chris?
 
The person who gave me your email was inconvenienced because he dis-agreed that his mother should have to pay £35 for new router, after complaining he got the router for free and Phone Line Rental at £1 month for 1 year, of course I don't want or need a new router, in fact I bought one last week just too make sure it wasn't both my sky routers I have that were the cause of the problem...and they weren't, so that's a cost I have incurred in attempt to resolve the issue, is there any offer similar to to my friends that can be offered so we can just put it too bed and forget about it?
 
We really appreciate everything you have done to try and help, you certainly are a credit to sky and I have said so on many occasions
 
Thanks Again,
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: coolsnakeman on May 21, 2012, 09:00:10 AM
Its always disappointing to see when a service provider has failed to realise the bigger picture in regards to repairing someones issue. Problem is they only see you as 1 person out of there almost or pretty possibly more than 10 million sky users for both broadband,tv and phone so when you have a complaint about something that is larger than you expect and is giving your neighbours trouble aswell without there backup and evidence to prove the picture is bigger then your complaint gets swept under the carpet. However your a brave man to close the door on this one and accept the level of service you are being provided. I hope in the 10 weeks time if your issues are still not resolve you start the battle again cause that appears to be what it is. However if this is putting an increase in your stress levels then its pretty clear and always has to be clear that your health is worth more than a broadband service so your better off closing the chapter on this one. Perhaps a migration move to another service provider could be an option for you and if sky attempt to hit you with early cancellation fee's and the rest of the contract you tell them no straight away and you get there tech guys to admit they where unable to resolve your technical issues.

Gary
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 21, 2012, 01:21:37 PM
Hi gary

ive since found out that the noise increases more in evenings , to point i lose as much as another 2Mb in sync rate, I have to reboot router next day to get it back.
So Iam reversing my decision on the "pay-off" because of this, because it means we will  accept a pay off and it will get worse and sky will do nothing. I was only happy to leave it if it stayed put... but its deteriating.

I have looked at my neighbours stats again (one on BT) and I can see he DOES have the AM spikes problem... just barely making any impact at all, so little I missed them the first time, another sky user 10 mins away from here back over from exchange (further away) also has them (via QLN stats) but they (again) at much lower noise levels and would barely make an impact on their connection if they were able to get a speed (SNR) good enough to allow it.

so it seems these AM noise spikes affect everyone BUT should only be to the point where it barely makes any impact on performance.. I had them with BT/o2 but again, made no real difference

so, can extra noise on the line increase the levels of the AM Radio noise spikes?  I have loads more noise on the line in comparison and because of such the AM Radio spikes are much stronger

Iam going back to the lass 2 doors down who has worse connection than me to extract her QLN/Hlog graphs today...

I have half-talked my partner into ditching sky completely for teh whole lot and going to Virgin for phone & broadband, and getting a Freesat+ box

mine is on left... blue line represents same levels in noise -125dBm (one on right is from connection in estate behind us, 45db line - only getting 4Mb sync)

http://i.imgur.com/V6T7L.jpg
(https://forum.kitz.co.uk/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FV6T7L.jpg&hash=00ed59b1e13999ab86806af3087bfe4f4ca28b12)
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: coolsnakeman on May 21, 2012, 04:55:03 PM
You need to make sure all this evidence your gathering are sky customers cause off course sky are not going to be interested in any BT customers that may be having an impact on there service. Also to keep ahead make sure they are also SVBN and try and match your results against SVBN customers in the area to WLR3 sky customers in the area to show sky the hugh difference. Get ticket id's and get your neighbours calling. If you do not want to do any of that due to stress levels then its time to move onto another provider cause at least that way you will come off SVBN and be put back to WLR3. It will also be a migration so no down time apart from the perhaps 30 minutes on the day of the switch over if even.

Gary
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: asbokid on May 21, 2012, 11:31:13 PM
What you are discussing here is nothing to do with "Tie-Pairs". They are Something Completely Different . . . (b*cat plays The Liberty Bell March (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_Bell_%28march%29), by J P Sousa (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Philip_Sousa), on the electronic organ.  ::)  )

A fellow connoisseur of the Sousa military marches?!

Sousa's Invincible Eagle March is one of my favourites.. played here by The President's Own United States Marine Band.   It seems an appropriate march for this forum which of late has become something of a breeding ground for eagles!

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keW93DCA6A4[/youtube]

cheers, a



Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 22, 2012, 12:07:22 AM
that one on right is a WLR3 phone but the broadband appears to be on the SVBN cos tracert 2nd hop was dr4.elnba.isp.sky.com address which is typical of SVBN MSAN (broadband only MSAN's usually have something like 840E6A89.bb.sky.com ) and of course EasyNet Dslams are easynet.net addresses

to me it seems to be something to do with Telephony side of it, but I could be wrong..they can obviously put the broadband anywhere they like while the phone is on WLR3,
that connection on right has bad internal wiring and could be why they only get 4Mb and their SNR was just a mess so couldn't reveal much more, BUT, iam sure they had 7-8Mb with Talk Talk before that (and thats what speed they should be getting at 45db) and going from the strength of the AM spike on their line I think it wouldnt have made much of an impact. Iam going to get my neighbours stats tomoz and will ask the one on WLR3 if I can pull more stats from her line again

ive started writing a letter to sky, then ive just realised I think I already have one...lol
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: Bald_Eagle1 on May 22, 2012, 12:10:38 AM

Sousa's Invincible Eagle March is one of my favourites..


Mine too, but it does all sound a bit Monty Python(ish).

Mind you this whole state of affairs regarding the UK's broadband services is a bit of a joke!
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: coolsnakeman on May 22, 2012, 08:33:24 AM
Get the stats from your neighbours WLR3 in the test socket so you can get straight results directly to the line. I would do the same for all the SVBN neighbours you have got given they have a test socket or not.

Gary
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 22, 2012, 11:51:40 AM
thing is its bad enough asking them If i can install my router and run tests on my or their laptop...never mind whipping me posi driver out and start dis-mantling their sockets hehe - their face would be a sight if I asked them if I could do that (when they dont know anything about test sockets and may worry I will break their phone lines)

the BT neighbour was concerned that I could be accesing his private stuff and said I could be taking bank details and he would be none the wiser...laughing about it of course but you could tell he had real concern...so much so that we had to create a new password in his Home Hub in order to get access and he wouldnt trust me with it lol.... not that Iam untrustworthy....just he is paranoid and has every right too be...lol

anyway, I will see what I can do...
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: coolsnakeman on May 22, 2012, 02:41:33 PM
Bring a BT phone book with you the test socket procedures are on page 7. Show your neighbours that and the fact it is in the BT phone book they will gain more trust in you removing the lower half of there socket.

Gary
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 22, 2012, 08:31:52 PM
OH I didnt know that about the BT Book hehe, anyway they did not have any extensions (other than the one who is on the other estate, I may ask of I can go around again sometime)

anyway, I went to my two neighbours houses today, one on SVBN and other on WLR3 (and I have stats from the other WLR3 in other estate behind me) and I have popped mine and theirs QLN stats together and just take a look (and bare in mind when I was on WLR3 it was perfect)...both SVBN ones a full of noise and both WLR3 ones have barely any noise at all affecting the connections.

the Blue line represents the same points in each graph , -125dBm , so take note of differences in amounts of noise above that line, as you can see the SVBN users have wayyyy more noise on the line greatly affecting our connections, yet the WLR3 users are barely affected, the WLR3 on bottom left had a 16.5Mb connection which is spot on for her line, the one on right has a long line and has dodgy internal wiring..!!

http://i.imgur.com/FkIpl.jpg

(https://forum.kitz.co.uk/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FFkIpl.jpg&hash=3162fb7aff0ac7dfa61cb0cad58e86ad938fa64e)
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: asbokid on May 22, 2012, 08:53:41 PM

Aha! Good stuff  :) To aid comparison, maybe plot using the same scale on the y-axis, or better, plot them over each other (in different colours) using the 'multiplot' command of GNUPlot :-)

cheers, a
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: Bald_Eagle1 on May 22, 2012, 09:09:02 PM

Aha! Good stuff  :) To aid comparison, maybe plot using the same scale on the y-axis, or better, plot them over each other (in different colours) using the 'multiplot' command of GNUPlot :-)

cheers, a

Here's how to plot them all at the same scale (-50 to -150).

Replace the existing equivalent section within ADSLGRAPH.BAT with this or just add the text shown in red:-


:QLN_GNP
   echo set terminal png small > qln.gnp
   echo set title 'ADSL - Quiet Line Noise (QLN)' >> qln.gnp
   echo set timestamp 'Data obtained %OBSTAMP%            Version %VERSION%                Graph created %%d/%%m/%%y %%H:%%M' 5,-1 >> qln.gnp
   echo set nokey >> qln.gnp
   echo set xlabel 'Tone (subcarrier index - 4.3125KHz spacing)' >> qln.gnp
   echo set ylabel 'QLN (dBm/Hz)' >> qln.gnp
   
   if %MODE% EQU G.DMT (
      echo set xrange [0:255] >> QLN.gnp
   )   
   

   rem ****** ADSL2+ ******
   if %MODE% EQU ADSL2+ (   

      echo set xrange [0:515] >> qln.gnp
   )

   echo set yrange [-150:-50] >> qln.gnp   
   echo set xtics out border nomirror 50 >> qln.gnp
   echo set ytics axis nomirror autofreq >> qln.gnp
   echo set mxtics 5 >> qln.gnp
rem   echo plot 'QLN.txt' w boxes fs solid >> qln.gnp
   echo plot 'QLN.txt' w lines >> qln.gnp

   goto :eof
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 22, 2012, 09:27:14 PM
thanks guys... I had thought about overlapping in diff colours.. I was gunna see if I could do it on Photoscape or GIMP

I will have a bash at plotting them on same scale :) that will be better than me having to draw a blue line

oh asbokid...any info on the SVBN noise on left? is that PSU..?  hers is much worse than mine and I think she has internal issues adding to it

edit: how do i get it to re-graph the log then?
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: Bald_Eagle1 on May 22, 2012, 09:40:32 PM
thanks guys... I had thought about overlapping in diff colours.. I was gunna see if I could do it on Photoscape or GIMP

I will have a bash at plotting them on same scale :) that will be better than me having to draw a blue line

oh asbokid...any info on the SVBN noise on left? is that PSU..?  hers is much worse than mine and I think she has internal issues adding to it

edit: how do i get it to re-graph the log then?

Just drag & drop the log onto ADSLGRAPH.BAT.

Make sure each log is in a different folder to ensure you don't overwrite the files (although they should all have their own date/timestamp).
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 22, 2012, 09:45:51 PM
I thought so, but when i do that with old or new ADSLGRAPH.BAT file the cmd window just flicks up for fraction of a second
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: Bald_Eagle1 on May 22, 2012, 09:49:35 PM
I thought so, but when i do that with old or new ADSLGRAPH.BAT file the cmd window just flicks up for fraction of a second

I just did it with someone else's log using the latest ADSLGRAPH.BAT (fixed Y axis at -70 & also at -50 to see the differences)


If you want to post the logs I'll check if they still plot at my end.
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: Bald_Eagle1 on May 22, 2012, 10:11:00 PM
Here's another version of ADSLGRAPH.BAT

I have added some grid lines to QLN & Hlog graphs.

Just a thought:-

If you are still struggling to replot the logs, you have to make sure there are no spaces in any file or folder names, otherwise that can cause CMD just to flick up for a split second.
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 22, 2012, 10:16:23 PM
ok i moved the log into same folder as bat file and it worked... i will replot them and stick them together again like before

thanks for that BA...really appreciate it :)
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 22, 2012, 11:24:19 PM
CHECK THIS OUT!!!! hehe spent hours doing these - i changed the script to make -130dBm to be the base and -60dBm to be ceiling to make it look more effective...

http://i.imgur.com/2HtfE.jpg

(https://forum.kitz.co.uk/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F2HtfE.jpg&hash=5db9d1a3b4b95389318e4988be7a2b3fe7ec4cc7)
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: asbokid on May 23, 2012, 12:44:31 AM
First class job, snadge!

Which is your line? Top Left?

Top Right is strange.  Those two notable noise troughs centred around DMT#95 and DMT#185 are unusual.

cheers, a
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 23, 2012, 11:42:22 AM
First class job, snadge!

Which is your line? Top Left?

Top Right is strange.  Those two notable noise troughs centred around DMT#95 and DMT#185 are unusual.

cheers, a

YEP mine is top left... I wanted to ask you about the top right one (my neighbour 2 doors down) - that noise curve, I noticed on someone else who had similar curve you said it looked like PSU noise..is that the case here? she obviously has it much worse than me?  I want to have a look at the JB on the end, thing is my nrighbour who is on BT and on same JB did not have any problems at all...  I may go along with my camera and posi driver and take some pictures, its trapped behind the apex of an old shed, its forever been crossing my mind if he has an AM Radio or something else in there OR on other side of the wall (their living room)

thing is it all started when sky switched me....but that doesnt mean it wasn't coincidence..I mean the line broke up here after being switched, perhaps it was at the JB all along? and my new line has sorted the crackling phone issues but still passes the RFI/EMI..?

edit: if  one was clever enough they could draw the curved line on those charts showing the border where noise meets the signal and starts to interfere with it? wouldnt that be possible? it would show just how much and where (which correlates to the SNR) the noise bleeds into the signal??

before all this started I didnt know much about SNR, QLN, Hlog etc etc....lol...or how to do these charts, so like someone said earlier "thats the good thing thats come from all this" ...sky will be begging me to come work for them when this is all over.....not!!
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: coolsnakeman on May 23, 2012, 11:45:42 AM
Nice graphs  ;D. See the reason why i had first said for you to get these results in the test socket is so sky can't give any excuses for your results. So if you go to them with those graphs and tell them each result was taking from the test socket they can't say there problem could be related to faulty equip or internal wiring etc etc.

Gary
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 23, 2012, 12:01:33 PM
Nice graphs  ;D. See the reason why i had first said for you to get these results in the test socket is so sky can't give any excuses for your results. So if you go to them with those graphs and tell them each result was taking from the test socket they can't say there problem could be related to faulty equip or internal wiring etc etc.

Gary

Thanks Gary,

Yeah they are all Test Socket bar the bottom right WLR3 one, which I may go back and see if it can do so and get it looking better than it is which would make it look even more persuasive ...

still not heard back from the rep I emailed, I bet he is ignoring my emails as he said he is closing my case, Iam emailing his work account directly... cant believe sky like...
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: Bald_Eagle1 on May 23, 2012, 12:36:52 PM
Yes, great looking graphs.
Well, not great at all, but you know what I mean ;).

The data is really useful as a quick snapshot of a given connection's current status & is much easier to see when presented so graphically.

For maximum impact though, I believe the graphical presentation of fluctuating data over time periods can add even more weight as proof of instability / deteriorated conditions.
i.e. A "before & after type" scenario all on one page.

My ISP paid some attenuation to my snapshot graphs, but eventually reached the stage of saying the changes were natural fluctuations, within acceptable limits and as to be expected.

Thus my development of the Ongoing Graphs.
They were sent to my ISP asking questions on the lines of "should users really expect to see all those fluctuations as depicted in the graphs, especially sync speed fluctuations of between 35Mb & 8Mb?"

More recently, I have been able to identify "fluctuations" that coincide with changes in weather conditions.

Many engineers have visited, usually with the warning that I may be charged if no Network fault is found.
These warnings have all come following remote tests conducted by both my ISP & BT where Line tests O.K. (LTOK) has been the result.

Each visiting engineer has ended up carrying out some different repair work that has slightly improved stability & speeds, therefore I have not been charged for any of the visits.

One of the simplest graphs that appeared to have the most impact in keeping my ISP engaged with my own connection issues was a graph of my IP Profiles since having FTTC installed last June.

The early data is rather sketchy as my connection was initially so good that I didn't feel the need to monitor it on a daily basis.

This graph is attached for reference.

If anyone wanted to graph such data, as long as they have the graphing applications installed, all that is needed is a simple text file in the following format.
The batch file that generates the graphs is available if required:-


01/08/11 10376
02/08/11 8714
03/08/11 8318
03/08/11 12257
04/08/11 23464
05/08/11 14830
06/08/11 15050
07/08/11 15050
08/08/11
09/08/11 20866
10/08/11 23149
11/08/11 23149
12/08/11 17657
13/08/11
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: coolsnakeman on May 23, 2012, 12:49:29 PM
Snadge,

How many WLR3 neighbours results do you have against SVBN customers? Remember to get at least 10 or more on SVBN alone if at all possible cause if sky do not then do some sort of investigation in regards to an MSO (major service outage) or MSF (major service failure) then you can go to ofcom with your results and evidence and ask them to look into it. Just so you know MSO and MSF both mean the same thing just some people call it MSO or MSF or at times just an outage  ;D

Gary
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 23, 2012, 12:54:44 PM
bloody heck BA -  ???  how many visits you had? haha

the majority of my problem is constant though, the late evening fluctuations vary, it seems to be worse at the weeked but need more data from this weekend to see if thats true, but I will keep an eye on those

sky have responded to my 3 page complaint I sent online (didnt have graph)

Quote
Dear ********

Thank you for your email regarding the slow speeds, noise the line and loss of earnings caused . I’m very sorry for the poor service you’ve received and apologise for any inconvenience you’ve suffered as a result of this.

I am unable to locate your account details, from your previous email. I tried to call you today although was unable to get a response. Please can you confirm your account number and address?

I will be working with you on this case until resolved and you can contact me via responding to this email or calling 08442 *** ***.

Yours sincerely

Mo Chaba
Service Excellence Consultant

Executive Support Team


I think before I respond Iam going too look at that JB/Shed scenario at the end, if it turns out to be something in their shed...who's fault is that? BT's for installling the JB on gable end of someones house?

@ Gary , cheers - I have found another sky user who says its slower since moving from BT but having just met them on the field I didnt wanna be rude and ask if I could come over and start testing their line...she said her hubby is a web designer so would know if something was up...lol... I didnt want to say that theres a good chance he doesnt hehe, for all I know he MAY be a xDLS freak....just like me!!!  anyway she has been with them 6 months, should be on SVBN, but that bottom right WLR3 result has been with sky for 6 months too (longer than me) and they are still on WLR3...why is this? I was with sky 2 weeks and I got letter saying I was being moved over to SVBN in 4 weeks time... yet the lady on the end on WLR3 has been with them a good 3-4 weeks and has not had any letter, and those I just mentioned are same and been with sky 6 months...  how do they decide who is being moved over to SVBN , and who isnt ?

also, both tracert results (on the WLR3 connections) 2nd hop were dr0.elnba.isp.sky.com IP's which are typical of SVBN MSAN... might be the Broadband Only MSAN - but befire I was moved to SVBN my IP was summit like 9450e59.bb.sky.com and one rep said i was on an ISAM and the last one said i was on BB only MSAN ???

I think...

123-456-78-90-easynet.net = Easynet DSLAM (WLR3+BB only)
12E4f567.bb.sky.com = ISAM (WLR3+BB only)
dr0.enlba.isp.sky.com = MSAN (WLR3+BB only or SVBN)

of course those addresses arent fixed and can change slightly

or you could say:

easynet.net
bb.sky.com
enlba.isp.sky.com

it seems they can port your broadband just about anywhere while phone is WLR3 provisioned
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 23, 2012, 01:09:15 PM
...sorry for all the changes I make after posting.. I cant help but rush everything then realise after posting it could be better...yes I do use preview too lol...

I have made loads of changes to above post
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: Bald_Eagle1 on May 23, 2012, 01:16:35 PM
Just a thought, but could any of your sync speed / throughput issues have anything to do with perhaps a suspect implementation of 'Cool Broadband' that has recently been mentioned in this thread:-

http://forum.kitz.co.uk/index.php/topic,11097.0.html

It appears that it has been removed for business customers following many complaints.

I THINK that Sky use Lower power mode L2 for some customers when individual demand has dropped, but I'm not sure.
You have mentioned SRA etc. so maybe a possibility that your power levels and/or sync speeds aren't being woken up properly when demand increases?

Do you ever see L2 in your info --stats logs?

This is mine (always):-
Link Power State:   L0
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 23, 2012, 01:40:47 PM
i know about cool broadband (ive joined that thread too so i can see what BS brings to the table for us :) ) but, no it aint effective on SKY's MSANs by looks of it... not yet anyway, whether or not sky will be rolling it out I dont know, I would imagine they will as it stands to save considerable amounts of money...

Link State: L0

and Output Power is alway 19.1dBm

thanks for the insight to L0/L2 etc anyway,

I have just heard that my neighbour who is with BT said his broadband ha become slow recently, he thinks Ive broke his connection with plugging my router into his socket to test the SNR etc all those weeks ago (and suddenly now its slow) lol.. I heard from my neighbour (his Pal).... mustnt be that bad or he would come and see me about it.!! ive been to 3 other non-BT neighbours twice to do same thing and they have no complaints... yet i fixed his laptop for him and showed him how to email etc...bah!!

maybe he has cool broadband issues ?

anyway, i cant go and help him as I will be dropping my neighbour in it, so now I have to smile and say hello and pretend like nothings wrong when I know he is not happy with me
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: coolsnakeman on May 24, 2012, 02:31:03 PM
Snadge,

Thats the sort of things you have to face when looking at other peoples technology problems. You have brought it to his attention there is an issue with the service. You have performed some basic simple tests to prove there is a wider issue in the area which would of course have no impact on his BB speed unless you took a hammer to his socket. However since you did some work your easier to blame for an issue that has just been brought to his attention. Would he have blamed you if you had NEVER brought these issues to his attention? Would he have ever even had a clue there was problems there? I would think not lol. So don't worry to much about his concerns they won't go no further than that. Cool broadband is still running with business customers at the minute the ones that are complaining of issues with it are being removed from it. I think its only BT services that are on this cool broadband thing at the minute which is only having an impact on 21cn customers so FTTC and 20cn are fine.

Gary
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 24, 2012, 03:04:44 PM
he is on WBC (ADSL2+) - is that 21CN..?

I have had a result with sky... they are sending out a special sky networking engineer with BT broadband engineer (so the sky engineer has full access) and they are going to start with the JB on end of my row... Im still not convinced as my (now unhappy) neighbour who is with BT is in that JB and he had no noise on his line like ours on sky - the rep was adamant that its not the hardware, also , some of the things he said seem to contradict some of the things ive been told, like moving from WLR3 (BT Line) to SVBN -> he said there is no physical moving of the cable within the exchange and that its just a setting change (or something alonng them lines) - im not convinced, my phone line was on BT's PSTN , then moved over into sky's part of the exchange into the ISAM (thats what he called it, ISAM, not MSAN?)

even if he meant the wire terminates at MDF before splitting off, there is still moving around from BT to SKY for the phone line...!! just didnt seem to make sense what he was telling me, I should have checked it with him, I just said "right" lol... you know you dont want to upset them by trying to tell them their jobs..haha  but there HAS been some physical changes to the line itself , doesnt matter if the broadband hasnt changed, ive said it for a while now that I think its something to do with the Telephony hardware side of it.. I may be wrong, but i can only guess...

http://forum.kitz.co.uk/index.php/topic,11218.0.html
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: coolsnakeman on May 24, 2012, 03:22:47 PM
Snadge,

21cn is ADSL2+ you are correct. Well you may be getting some results there sky have agreed to a "joint meet" with BT openreach so both sides of the field have full access to everything and can bash there heads together to get this sorted. Good luck mate.

Gary
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: roseway on May 24, 2012, 04:33:58 PM
To be slightly pedantic, 21CN is just a major upgrade of the BT national network. The feature which brings ADSL2+ capability is WBC (Wholesale Broadband Connect) and many exchanges are upgraded to 21CN-WBC but do not have the full 21CN upgrade.
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: burakkucat on May 24, 2012, 05:18:30 PM
Quote
. . . into the ISAM (thats what he called it, ISAM, not MSAN?)

A pedantic cat replies --

No, sorry Snage.  :no:  You've got things muddled. It is an MSAN -- a Multiple Services Access Node.  :)

The last time I recall seeing the abbreviation ISAM (in the 1980s), it stood for Indexed Sequential Access Method!  :-\
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 24, 2012, 05:51:54 PM
@ Eric - I thought that WBC was part of 21CN :)

@ B'Kat - no I have not got muddled, thats what he said.  ??? -  :)
ISAM - Integrated Services Access Manager. - Ive had 1 sky rep and 1 sky network engineer refer to ISAM's now at the exchange, they must have both?
when I asked months ago if I was on Dslam or Msan I got reply saying I was ported directly into their ISAM , my IP on tracert 2nd hop was something like AE527F120.bb.sky.com which users on Sky User said they hadnt seen before? - then the rep that was dealing with my case later said it was a Broadband Only MSAN..?  ive a feeling it was this ISAM and that was his way of describing it too me.

maybe all sky's MSAN's and DSLAM's go into sky's ISAM...?

now im on SVBN my ip on 2nd hop is dr0.enlba.isp.sky.com , but, my two neighbours that are on WLR3 also have enlba.isp.sky.com addresses on 2nd hop

Easynet Dslam (stinger) is something like AE527F120.easynet.net

the evidence would say (and it has been suggested by an ex sky rep) they can put your broadband wherever they like , regardless of your phone being on WLR3, normally it is the case (or has been) with sky that when your phone is on WLR3 you get put on the stinger Dslam (easynet.net) - then your moved over to SVBN MSAN if and when your exchange has the equipment

it has certainly been educational - by time its finished i will know sky inside out haha
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: roseway on May 24, 2012, 06:49:07 PM
@ Eric - I thought that WBC was part of 21CN :)

Well, as I said, I was being slightly pedantic. 21CN and ADSL2+ are not synonymous - the WBC component of 21CN enables ADSL2+ as an option, but other types of ADSL are supported too. And it isn't necessary for an exchange to be upgraded to the full 21CN to get these options - only the WBC component is needed.

(Sorry, I have a habit of doing this. I think I must have been a schoolmaster in another life. :) )
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 24, 2012, 09:12:52 PM
@ Eric - I thought that WBC was part of 21CN :)

Well, as I said, I was being slightly pedantic. 21CN and ADSL2+ are not synonymous - the WBC component of 21CN enables ADSL2+ as an option, but other types of ADSL are supported too. And it isn't necessary for an exchange to be upgraded to the full 21CN to get these options - only the WBC component is needed.

(Sorry, I have a habit of doing this. I think I must have been a schoolmaster in another life. :) )

No its ok , its good to make sure its clear :) it seems to get muddled up a lot  - ive always known 21CN as the term for the next gen network upgrades that BT are rolling out, these include WBC (Wholesale Broadband Connect) which is ADSL2+ provision and FTTC (Fibre-To-The-Cabinet) which as we all know is fibre provision , there is (I think) also hardware enhancements/upgrades and upgrades for the Telephone side of things too (I may be wrong there) - I just wanted to be sure thats why I asked.

Ive asked on sky help forum about the ISAM thing, but they dont seem to know much about it either (which is to be expected) - but a rep did say that MSAN replaces the ISAM when an MSAN is present, but they dont have any other info apart from that... so Im wondering if the ISAM is part of the old Dslam setup? maybe the ISAM controlled all the DSLAMs..? I dunno... I WISH i had asked the engineer now... anyway they do exist, Integrated Services Access Manager...theres even ASAM's (but dunno if they are used in this country)

I could be wrong.... just a guess, but maybe they started installing ISAM's to replace the easynet DSLAM's - but then they changed to MSAN's which handles both data and voice, and as such some exchanges have both and some have one or the other (which is more or less what the sky rep on their forum has just said)

Alcatel Lucent 7302 ISAM (http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/wps/portal/!ut/p/kcxml/04_Sj9SPykssy0xPLMnMz0vM0Y_QjzKLd4w3dnTRL8h2VAQADYR9IA!!?LMSG_CABINET=Solution_Product_Catalog&LMSG_CONTENT_FILE=Products/Product_Detail_000411.xml)

EDIT: more searching may suggest that ISAM is Alcatel's term for their MSAN's , so maybe when sky refer to ISAM it just a different/older type of MSAN they have...dont know who supplys there new ones then
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 26, 2012, 11:46:52 AM
strange SNR and bit-swapping in warm weather?

seems to be getting worse in warm weather which co-incides getting better in damp weather... Bald_eagle mentioned service specific filtered faceplate made difference on his and coould be iffy - ive only had this 'strangeness' since having it installed....gunna change it over

(https://forum.kitz.co.uk/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg72.imageshack.us%2Fimg72%2F2682%2Flinestatsp201205261140.png&hash=33760836de9b900935ec7799c6ebb84d841a9451)
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 27, 2012, 04:49:56 PM
UPDATE:

the SNS (Sky Network Services) Engineer called before – he said he had been getting my emails with my graphs, he said that he would like to get another BT Broadband Engineer out on his own (without sky engineer) because the last one didnt do the job and if they got a Sky Engineer out and the problem turned out to be on BT’s loop then they would be charging BT for the call out, and this happens a lot of the time he says, he reckons if it does happen then when BT get the bill they could and probably would say that they refuse to pay because they weren't given a chance to fix it, if the 1st broadband engineer couldnt stay to do it then you should have told us and we would have arranged another...
 
so...  to make sure that doesnt happen, he wants to get another broadband engineer out and if he is unsuccessful they will get a Sky Engineer out with a BT Engineer.
 
its been arranged for next Friday afternoon, the engineer I spoke to on the phone (Liam) has taken my mobile number so he can call me directly on the day so he can talk to the BT engineer, so the BT engineer doesnt have to go through the “co-op” system which can cause problems ... he said he may give you some rubbish like “iam not allowed to speak to him” but he can...so this should be interesting...
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: coolsnakeman on May 28, 2012, 12:31:24 PM
Snadge,

They are allowed to speak to a service providers engineer this is certainly not in breach of compliance cause that would not be deemed as favouritism in the eyes of ofcom. Whats the BT engineer going to do sell the sky engineer BT broadband lolll Anyway sounds like you are getting closer to getting this resolved and you can now see sky's engineers are seeing a problem there due to your investigative work you have carried out which for the record you should never have had to do thats what you pay your service provider for.

Gary
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 28, 2012, 12:45:28 PM
Hi Gary,

I have to say, the more I speak to the SNS Engineer, the less confident Iam about it getting sorted, Iam sure he is angling for cheaper alternatives (RF3 filter) and readying me for a big let down:

1. I sent him graphs showing Noise Margin fluctuations between 8-9pm through to 3-4am which lower my speed by a futher 2Mb - he says this is common and to be expected?? even though I said I never had this before...

2. I sent him graphs showing the bit-loading/SNR before/after where the higher tones where hit more by noise than the tones where the AM Radio Spikes where and he said "low bit loading on these tones is normal, so im not too concerned about that" - he went on about only being concerned where the tones are being completely knocked out...which...only accounts for a small amount of the missing bandwidth when compared to the upper tones missing bits/SNR which accounts for most of the missing bandwidth...

3. I sent him graphs showing the upstream line attenuation at seven different values between 7db-16db over just 3 days (between reboots) - but after what he said about the two above I didnt even ask him about it ...in fear he would be sick of me trying to hound him about improper values he may deem to be "normal"

Ive a feeling when friday comes it will be a quick test at the JB and stick an RF3 filter on once they realise the problem ISNT there... and if RF3 filter gets rid of the radio spikes then I will gain all of 1.5Mbps...or so? and may attempt to fob me off with that :( because that what it feels like its heading towards....how can those massive noise increases in evening, missing bits/SNR from upper tones and fluctuating Attenuation all be "normal" when i didnt have it before my switch to SVBN
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: coolsnakeman on May 28, 2012, 03:17:30 PM
Snadge,

Perhaps it is deemed as normal on there network as they expect this kind of thing on the SVBN equipment however its down to wither you deem it as acceptable and value for money. Remember you are the customer at the end of the day and its down to you wither or not you feel there equipment and everything else that comes with it is what you want as a service. That kind of carry on with a BT network i certainly would not deem as normal if anything i would see that as ridiculous and something needs to be done about it. I do hope something positive comes out of this on friday cause this has been a long road for you and i give you a big clap for your patience cause if it had of been me i would of been requested my Mac code by now to move away to another service perhaps one that doesn't use that type of technology. I would also been getting written confirmation that sky are unable to fix or improve your service so cancelling out of technical reasons would get you out of your contract without inccuring any charges. I played that call when moving from BT although they wanted me to pay £30 instead of £130 which i agreed to considering it was £100 knocked off which you can't go wrong with  :lol:

Gary
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 28, 2012, 03:54:55 PM
Hi Gary,

I could not get a MAC code though Gary, I may have swapped back if it were that easy, when your on SVBN its a cease and reprovide because its FMPF (Full Metallic Path Facility) , MAC code system does not operate over sky's SVBN, infact, as far as Im aware you can no longer get Sky Broadband on its own, you have to take phone line with it...could be wrong but Iam sure thats what I read over at Sky User.

also, the neighbour who thinks I have broke his broadband has just blanked our lass out when she waved at him... pathetic, really is... if he is that bothered about it WHY doesnt he come and see me about it?
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: coolsnakeman on May 28, 2012, 05:26:07 PM
Snadge,

Perhaps you should approach him and speak to him to clear the air. At least your giving him a chance to get whatever he needs off his chest cause he may be going around telling people you have broke his service when in actual fact it was broke well and truly before you touched it lol. Your right about sky you can not get there broadband service without signing up to there line service and you can't get there line service without signing up to there tv service so you need to sign up to it all to get broadband.

Gary
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 28, 2012, 08:15:52 PM
Snadge,

Perhaps you should approach him and speak to him to clear the air. At least your giving him a chance to get whatever he needs off his chest cause he may be going around telling people you have broke his service when in actual fact it was broke well and truly before you touched it lol. Your right about sky you can not get there broadband service without signing up to there line service and you can't get there line service without signing up to there tv service so you need to sign up to it all to get broadband.

Gary

SERIOUSLY???

you cant just get a Phone Line or Phone line & Broadband?
I thought there were extra costs involved if you didnt have the TV, e.g. broadband is £10.00 instead of £7.50..?

re my neighbour: I cant approach and say "you think this...that" cos i will be dropping my next door neighbour right in it, but, Iam just gunna make a point of saying hello and seeing what his response is, mind, before I found out about it he was fine, said hello and joked on about his garden when I walked past 3 times the other day, then I was told about it, my neighbbour could see I was upset about it and I was saying I wanted it sorted out, so (feelin a bit guilty / sorry for me) he said he would go and see him (he didnt want to because it would drop him in it, he just said he would as he could see I was upset) so, I just wondered away into the house and he (my next door neighbour) knocked 5-10 minutes later and said he spoke to him and told him I wanted to see him about it to get it sorted and he said "he says its your problem, you deal with it" (meaning its my next door neighbours problem, him deal with it???)... which I found totally odd.. I dont think my next door neighbour really went too see him, changed his mind and made that up....BUT... its been since then he ignored my lass and 2 days ago I was cutting grass and I said hello and he didnt say anything back but thought it may have been cos of the mower i couldnt hear him, im so pee'd off because TWICE this man has asked me too look at his laptop for him, and TWICE ive fixed it...first time for free, second time for £10... now I ask him for a favour and he calling me worse than **** down the pub?
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: coolsnakeman on May 29, 2012, 11:05:04 AM
Snadge,

Don't let it worry you to much it is just ignorance to technology. Not wanting to give himself time to learn about it he would rather blame someone else on breaking something that was already broken. Best thing to do is decline his requests to repair anything else belonging to him and if he asks why then just tell him you don't have liability insurance to cover for anything that might go wrong. Noone likes to fall out with there neighbours so pass yourself with him and carry on your day he will come around eventually when he realises he has been in the wrong. I run my own IT business i see this on a daily basis and taking the civilized approach to these circumstances are always best. If you do go and fix anyone elses laptops or PC's be sure to explain to them what you are doing to repair the machine and also get them to sign a consent form to show they are giving you consent to work on there machine and if any loss of data or damage due to static is caused during this procedure that you are not going to be held liable for those damages. Keeps your own back covered. Make sure you stick to your ESD procedures using an anti static bracelet if your going into a machine and grounding yourself and explain that to your customer so he understands your carry out safety procedures to protect his machine. Something as simple as that can avoid speculation from your customer  ;D

Gary
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on May 29, 2012, 04:14:02 PM
thanks Gary,

taken onboard, its been on my mind all day today and I made myself ill worrying about it, had to go lie down cos wasnt feeling to well. At least I know I haven't done anything wrong , the reason he is getting 8Mb sync instead of 16Mb sync is because he uses a really long extension lead from hallway into living room where it feeds the router, his SNRM was through the roof, he may even be fixed on an 8Mb package (he was on ADSL2+) , but I think its that, see I pointed it out that he should be getting 16Mb ... he said "oh im on cheapest package" and I said "I dont think it matters, I think BT are same speeds on all packages" - i showed him the RCO saying he could get 16Mb - but I went on to show and explain the SNR Spectrum and how his broadband is spot on, now I think about it he may have dwelled on this "should be getting 16Mb" issue and now assumes its my fault he aint getting it... silly thing is if he approaches me about it I could sort it out in seconds...  he has always had 8Mb and its been enough, but now ive pointed it out he thinks he had more and ive broke it.

ah well, watch this space
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: coolsnakeman on May 29, 2012, 05:00:01 PM
Snadge,

Not worth making yourself ill over the height of it. Like i said he is ignorant to technology and cause he doesn't understand it and you do that makes you an easier target to blame a fault on (even though there is no fault just a pretty long extension cable). If he approaches you about it and blames you on breaking it advise him to remove the extension cable and go directly into the master socket then check his speeds then come back to you if it still isn't working. He is obviously paranoid and thinks you have waived that magic wand and taking away 8Mb of speed on him.

Gary
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on June 02, 2012, 12:58:31 AM
Gary - see HERE (http://forum.kitz.co.uk/index.php/topic,11218.msg217818.html#msg217818) on how today went mate ..lol
Title: Re: Cable Pairs - A Question
Post by: snadge on June 04, 2012, 01:04:38 PM
Gary - sorted mate :)

all fixed... lost a little bit of speed (1-2Mb) but nothing to complain about

see here
http://forum.kitz.co.uk/index.php/topic,11218.msg217977.html#msg217977