Kitz Forum
Broadband Related => Broadband Hardware => Topic started by: tommy45 on May 27, 2014, 09:09:50 PM
-
When compared to the ECI modem, the min latency shoots up to 100ms + using the HG612, where as when using the eci it was around 40ms tops maxing the upstream out with 6-10 threads to a FTP server, does any one else see this with their HG612?
-
QoS disabled on the HG or perhaps a better processor in the ECI? There must be a reason the later HG appears to run cooler...!
-
Yeah the QOS option is disabled as far as i can tell, could be the on board cpu that is responsible for the latency increases, seems very likely
-
Not seen it.. but obviously somethings working hard.
Im not sure how this would affect things.. but what about packet loss and delays from CRCs?
-
Yeah the QOS option is disabled as far as i can tell, could be the on board cpu that is responsible for the latency increases, seems very likely
I would personally re-enable the QoS unless you are prioritising traffic on another device? It would explain the latency jump on upstream rapage.
Interleaving/INP differences between the two modems and adjacent MSANs would be the other I guess? Not easy to find out though as I believe the ECI doesn't provide stats...?
-
Well both modem and Dslam are Huawei currently Min latency is slightly higher , which i recall someone else talking about ,
As for interleaving it's off in both directions currently and was also off prior to me swapping to the hg612
-
I'm better with vendor strings than names :D
Huawei = which vendor string?
What kinda numbers are we talking here too?
I've had an ECI modem connected to my dad's ECI cabinet all week and the latency has remained a solid 11ms with the occasional 10ms. This is no different to the SR102 it replaced. This is a 40/10 service btw. I will probably chuck the HG on it next week so see some stats now that I have a realistic baseline.
-
HG612 3B modem, when compared to the ECI (2013) If i try and fully utilize the upstream by using an FTP client to upload 6 or more threads at the same time, the min/average latency shows a greater increase when using the HG612 when compared to the ECI , My baseline latency is 12-13ms when connection is idle,
ECI ftp 6 threads min /ave latency increases to 35-40ms
Huawei FTP 6 threads min/ave latency increase to 100-135ms
Both tests performed on the same PC using the same FTPclient to the same FTPserver
Interestingly you referred to temp of the HG612 running cooler than the ECI i personally haven't observed much difference between the 2 , both seem to run cool
The min base latency has only increased by 1-2ms and it is more or less stable, through a 24hrs period, downloading , gives the same/similar results as the ECI a typical 1 ms increase, unless the it hits congestion somewhere during peak times