Apologies, my mistake and me seeing the lower cost for Market A from their pricing list and getting them mixed up, knowing that its supposedly unregulated that are cheaper.
I think BT may also be getting them mixed up too on their latest price list and transposed the figures... What the heck has happened to their pricing?
This is from the WBC Tarriff dated 1st Jan 2016
AP national coverage (combined with IPsC CP Handover option) - Market A 12 Months 01/07/2014 Month £20,968.00
AP national coverage (combined with IPsC CP Handover option) - Market B 12 Months 01/07/2014 Month £6,532.00
Yet this is the latest WBC Tarriff dated 14th of April 2016
AP national coverage (combined with IPsC CP Handover option) - Market A 12 Months 01/07/2014 Month £6,532.00
AP national coverage (combined with IPsC CP Handover option) - Market B 12 Months 01/07/2014 Month £20,968.00
Have they messed with the Market A & B figures big time, or have they got them the wrong way round on the latest price guide.
I think they initially got those Market A and B figures the wrong way round, and recently fixed them in the latest price lists.
I pointed this out when discussing Plusnet non low-cost area pricing, in the older price lists, with Market 1,2,3, it was indeed Market 3 that was more expensive - that's probably because WBC coverage for Market B covers far more exchanges and end-users than Market A. Yes I still think Plusnet non low-cost pricing for FTTC and WBC is a total con trick.
IPSC does look much more expensive in Market B than Market A. But there's probably very little or no IPSC used in Market B anyway, most or all has WBC available, WBC is cheaper and doesn't have different per Mb per month bandwidth costs for Market A/B. A&A presumably could use TalkTalk wholesale in Market B instead of BTWholesale.