Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[tbailey2]

What actual problems has there been with G.INP on ECI other than the strange FEC errors on upstream?

Surely if there was a good reason to halt we'd have seen it 

I've seen plenty of issues; loss of speed, loss of stability - just like when G.INP mk1 was rolled out.

its going to be a micky take if they start rolling out this 3db g.inp profile whilst people are still waiting for them to unsuspend the g.inp rollout.

Who said it's suspended? There have been several ECIs this week

[Chrysalis]

tony please check them, all had no previous data or long outage before the alert.

Have you seen any migrated ECI's this week which were running 24/7 before the alert?

[Terranova667]

Bob pullen on Plusnet forum has responded this is what he had to say

"To my knowledge, retransmission has been disabled from certain ECI lines it was recently enabled on. If you're one of those affected, it doesn't necessarily mean you were having problems.

If you did benefit from the change, then I'm fairly certain you'll see g.inp reapplied at some point".

I asked him why they did that and what about those where it had a negative effect he said

"Don't take my word for it, but probably an exercise in caution. Hopefully to sort issues like yours"

[tbailey2]

tony please check them, all had no previous data or long outage before the alert.

Have you seen any migrated ECI's this week which were running 24/7 before the alert?

Only just seen this and have posted elsewhere but I said:
==

Only one of those two [on Friday] (spotter) was ECI with G.INP and he was a NEW user so no previous stats - his last resync was 17 hours prior to first stats.

On Wednesday, xhemp registered for ECI and has G.INP but no previous stats. His last resync  was 93 hours prior to registration.

But there were two new ECI/G.INP activations on Tuesday from existing users as posted elsewhere.

There are only 30 ECI users on MDWS at the moment, and only five of those don't yet have ECI with one currently deactivated (skyECI). Not sure those figures are a reliable basis for evaluating whether it has been delayed or stopped?
==

You can derive all this from the existing MDWS stats.

[skyeci]

Called sky fibre pro support re losing g.inp again. No idea or information available.

[kitz]

A bit more info about what is going on about the suspension of g.inp on some lines.

http://forum.kitz.co.uk/index.php/topic,17446.0.html

[S.Stephenson]

How low can INP go?

I went from 49 on HG612 to 45 on ECi, and it has dropped to 44 on the ECi now.

[ktz392837]

How low can INP go?

I went from 49 on HG612 to 45 on ECi, and it has dropped to 44 on the ECi now.

Is lower better?  Thanks

[S.Stephenson]

It should be better, maybe it explains the increase in sync on ECi Modems vs HG612 since G.INP rolled out.

[Dray]

I think that's down to the modem chipset matching the cab chipset and fastpath being the default profile.

[skyeci]

Just wondered if there was any point in connecting up a spare eci modem I have just unlocked???

[skyeci]

Just thought it might be of interest. Modem resync this morning, whilst g.inp appears not to have been re-applied I have had the delay and interleave removed and an increase in ds sync rate. Back to 12ms on the latency which is good.

Not sure how to explain that...

[Dray]

Explain what? You're on fastpath..

[skyeci]

Ok cheers. Learning all the time 

[stevebrass]

It should be better, maybe it explains the increase in sync on ECi Modems vs HG612 since G.INP rolled out.

I have tried an unlocked ECI Modem and an unlocked HG612. Latency is the same but the HG612 achieves 18m download and the ECI 15/16M.

I am G.Inped