Kitz ADSL Broadband Information
adsl spacer  
Support this site
Home Broadband ISPs Tech Routers Wiki Forum
 
     
   Compare ISP   Rate your ISP
   Glossary   Glossary
 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Because I can't remember - is there any point in using DrTCP on fibre  (Read 4835 times)

Oldjim

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 242
Re: Because I can't remember - is there any point in using DrTCP on fibre
« Reply #15 on: March 08, 2017, 09:43:45 AM »

Thanks Chrysalis
Will change to the numbers suggested although before I do this page seems to suggest a value of 580,000 which is a lot higher https://community.plus.net/t5/Library/Guide-To-RWIN-amp-MTU/ba-p/1322233 also - and this contradicts both of these values - isn't the limit you can put in the field 65,535 as it is a 2 byte field or does the program do something with windows scaling - a value of 4 perhaps
« Last Edit: March 08, 2017, 10:08:17 AM by Oldjim »
Logged
Jim
Plusnet

Chrysalis

  • Content Team
  • Addicted Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 7390
  • VM Gig1 - AAISP L2TP
Re: Because I can't remember - is there any point in using DrTCP on fibre
« Reply #16 on: March 08, 2017, 01:04:57 PM »

windows scaling increases the byte limit.

you can try the higher value its up to you, I just suggested that as a starting point.
Logged

Weaver

  • Senior Kitizen
  • ******
  • Posts: 11459
  • Retd s/w dev; A&A; 4x7km ADSL2 lines; Firebrick
Re: Because I can't remember - is there any point in using DrTCP on fibre
« Reply #17 on: March 08, 2017, 09:28:59 PM »

Oldjim - correct this is a two byte wide field, but window scaling means that it is to be reinterpreted as something shifted left n places, so this is how you get the big values. The wider (shifted) result value that you can enter clearly has to be a multiple of 2n bytes and it has been suggested that you make the thing a multiple of MSS as discussed earlier, a slight tweak, not critical, if my understanding is correct (very rusty). I have heard of window scale shift values that are quite high, they are not always the smallest values that will reach a particular result. ( eg << 8 even though the result is nowhere big enough to need it.)
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]