Kitz ADSL Broadband Information
adsl spacer  
Support this site
Home Broadband ISPs Tech Routers Wiki Forum
 
     
   Compare ISP   Rate your ISP
   Glossary   Glossary
 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: G.fast  (Read 6817 times)

Black Sheep

  • Helpful
  • Addicted Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 5722
G.fast
« on: January 10, 2017, 07:22:18 AM »

Our G.fast trials have raised nearly 25,000 smiles…

Our commitment on Ultrafast broadband (that’s speeds of 100Mbs or more) is to make it available to 12m premises by 2020. 10m of those will be by using G.fast, and thanks to some fantastic work by teams across Infrastructure Delivery, Service Delivery, Customer, Commercial & Propositions and CIO, we’ve now taken our Ultrafast G.fast to almost 25,000 homes as part of our pilot in Cherry Hinton and Gillingham.
 
G.fast is a clever piece of technology that helps us take faster speeds to more people. It works by attaching a pod to the side of the existing copper cabinet which ultracharges our network to speeds of up to an incredible 330Mbps. But it’s not just our innovation that we’re proud of – it’s the pace at which we’re deploying it, too. In November we told you that we’d connected our first live customer, and in the next week or so, we’ll be starting the extension of our pilot rollout to an additional 17 locations and over 100,000 premises. But for now, it’s 25,000 down and 9,975,000 to go!

It might just be a drop in the ocean, but it’s a significant one.

Kim Mears
MD, Infrastructure Delivery

[Moderator edit to remove the errant zero.]
« Last Edit: January 10, 2017, 06:17:38 PM by burakkucat »
Logged

Jaggies

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 92
Re: G.fast
« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2017, 07:58:37 AM »

9,9750,000 to go!

Misplaced comma there, or a surplus zero?
Logged

jaydub

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 351
Re: G.fast
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2017, 01:25:00 PM »

Misplaced comma there, or a surplus zero?

Extra 0!

10,000,000 - 25,000 = 9,975,000.

The PR people must have been dozing when they released that one. ;)
Logged

NewtronStar

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4898
Re: G.fast
« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2017, 05:32:32 PM »

How could they reach that target of 12 million if the FTTC cab is 600-1000 meters from the end users premises, what I would like to know is how many broadband lines there are across the UK ?
Logged

ejs

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2078
Re: G.fast
« Reply #4 on: January 10, 2017, 06:03:34 PM »

According to the Ofcom Connected Nations Report 2016 page 25, total broadband uptake is 22.5 million premises (78% uptake), of which 9.1 million are superfast. But those are take up figures, the coverage figures would be much higher.
Logged

niemand

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1836
Re: G.fast
« Reply #5 on: January 10, 2017, 06:11:56 PM »

How could they reach that target of 12 million if the FTTC cab is 600-1000 meters from the end users premises

http://labs.thinkbroadband.com/local/index.php?tab=2&theory=1

Along with some FTTP. Those further away and not covered by FTTP are SOOL until at least 2020.
Logged

NewtronStar

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4898
Re: G.fast
« Reply #6 on: January 10, 2017, 06:13:23 PM »

Interesting so that leaves 15 Million who won't benefit from G.FAST
Logged

gt94sss2

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: G.fast
« Reply #7 on: January 10, 2017, 11:17:17 PM »

12 million super fast is Openreach's target for 2020 - the rollout is expected to continue to approx 2025 or so
Logged

niemand

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1836
Re: G.fast
« Reply #8 on: January 11, 2017, 12:05:09 AM »

The target is for 10 million at 100Mb or higher on G.fast by the way. That equates to very approximately 80/20 range, with crosstalk impact. The median line length from the cabinet, about 500m, is extremely unlikely to see 100Mb.

It should be made very clear this is not to compete with Virgin Media on speed, but to allow ISPs to deliver ultrafast to some punters who want it.

By the time G.fast leaves pilot it's quite likely that the 'incredible' 330Mb, sold as 300Mb most likely, will be facing a GigaWorld product - 1000Mb, sold at 940. Maybe more depending on the hub they use.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzBrAdafe58[/youtube]

In the UK it'll cost less per home passed to upgrade the cable network to gigabit than for BT to deploy G.fast from pods and a large proportion of the country can be done with no upgrades in the field.
Logged

j0hn

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4098
Re: G.fast
« Reply #9 on: January 11, 2017, 01:41:36 AM »

The 12 million "ultrafast" by 2020 is made up of 10 million G.Fast and 2 million FTTP. It's of no surprise that the only local area to me (East central Scotland) taking part in the extended G.Fast trial (Edinburgh, Donaldson) is well covered by Virgin. Why don't they start with areas with less choice? The rollout plans are pretty ridiculous, a good example below.

A new build in my area built just after the 1st FTTC commercial rollout has been left with 1mb ADSL. Every other cabinet in the area has FTTC except this 1 cabinet. As it made the local press the house builder Taylor Wimpey agreed to privately fund the FTTC cabinet. Due to scare mongering about cabinets filling up, for 500 homes they just installed 2 x 288 Huawei cabinets from launch.

Due to the press and the local Facebook campaign asking all residents to sign-up to the Virgin "come to my street" webpage, Virgin are now coming to that area in April, their first steps in my county. So OpenReach have went 1 further now that Virgin are coming and half the 600 homes are listed as "in scope" for FTTP. After all the DSLAMs didn't cost them a penny.

So from 1mb they now have 2 Huawei DSLAMs, Virgin coming, and OpenReach native FTTP coming. Given all that I'd be amazed if they even fill 1 of the 2 new cabinets. Meanwhile nowhere else served by my exchange is covered by Virgin, or has FTTP. Sledgehammer and nut come to mind.
Logged
Talktalk FTTP 550/75 - Speedtest - BQM

Black Sheep

  • Helpful
  • Addicted Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 5722
Re: G.fast
« Reply #10 on: January 11, 2017, 10:20:56 AM »

It's called business acumen, j0hn ............... nothing more, nothing less.
Logged

niemand

  • Kitizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1836
Re: G.fast
« Reply #11 on: January 11, 2017, 11:24:37 AM »

Interesting to see Openreach so interested in this, and overbuilding of FTTC with FTTP. I thought no-one cared about higher speeds and it was all about price?  :P
Logged

Black Sheep

  • Helpful
  • Addicted Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 5722
Re: G.fast
« Reply #12 on: January 11, 2017, 11:53:31 AM »

Interesting to see Openreach so interested in this, and overbuilding of FTTC with FTTP. I thought no-one cared about higher speeds and it was all about price?  :P

It's all about competition, my friend. If there was no threat by VM, I'm guessing there's be no FTTP ??  ;) :P

PS ..... no-one does care about gigantybytes speed ..... only a couple of dozen people.  ;D
Logged

Ronski

  • Helpful
  • Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4302
Re: G.fast
« Reply #13 on: January 11, 2017, 01:21:42 PM »

It's ridiculous thats what it is, plain and simple  :P

Just like installing G.Fast at the cabinet, let's try and sell faster speeds to people who already have the fastest fttc speeds available. Unless it's priced very similar to 80/20  I doubt the majority will pay more for what they don't actually need.
Logged
Formerly restrained by ECI and ali,  now surfing along at 550/52  ;D

Ronski

  • Helpful
  • Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4302
Re: G.fast
« Reply #14 on: January 11, 2017, 01:29:47 PM »

It's all about competition, my friend. If there was no threat by VM, I'm guessing there's be no FTTP ??  ;) :P

So is that BTor admitting that fttc is simply not up to the job  :P

Quote
PS ..... no-one does care about gigantybytes speed ..... only a couple of dozen people.  ;D

Probably not, but I'd be willing to bet that an awful lot of people would care about the improved reliability and getting the sync speeds quoted  ;D
Logged
Formerly restrained by ECI and ali,  now surfing along at 550/52  ;D
Pages: [1] 2
 

anything