Kitz ADSL Broadband Information
adsl spacer  
Support this site
Home Broadband ISPs Tech Routers Wiki Forum
 
     
   Compare ISP   Rate your ISP
   Glossary   Glossary
 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: BT sync rate 'advantage'?  (Read 4237 times)

plexy

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 115
Re: BT sync rate 'advantage'?
« Reply #15 on: August 11, 2016, 04:33:00 PM »

Hi folks
thanks for replies and thoughts.

Today the sync shot back up 76 currently. back to where it was with BT

interestingly, G.INP looks to be the culprit. It wasnt in use on the line until sometime during the night last night. yesterday a burst of 10 SES happened.. then INP went on overnight and sync went up.
« Last Edit: August 11, 2016, 04:36:08 PM by plexy »
Logged
--
SSE 80/20
Sky 40/10
Zen 80/20
Bonded: 200/50 (in progress)

Hardware:Hg612/HH5/Tg589vac/Linux SBC router

kitz

  • Administrator
  • Senior Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 33883
  • Trinity: Most guys do.
    • http://www.kitz.co.uk
Re: BT sync rate 'advantage'?
« Reply #16 on: August 13, 2016, 10:39:29 AM »

If G.INP has been applied and you have gained some sync speed, that would possibly infer that the line was previously interleaved.
I'm unsure if 10 x SES on its own would have caused G.INP to be applied.  What were your ErrSecs like?

It is possible that when you migrated the change of product profile will have caused a DLM reset and in this type of DLM reset its not unusual Interleaving to be applied by default. If the line is stable for 'x' period of time, then the DLM tends to apply G.INP.

Would need to see some before and after stats really to be sure. 
Logged
Please do not PM me with queries for broadband help as I may not be able to respond.
-----
How to get your router line stats :: ADSL Exchange Checker

roswellgrey

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 73
Re: BT sync rate 'advantage'?
« Reply #17 on: August 14, 2016, 07:51:52 AM »

Appreciate the kitz's comments were addressing plexy's situation, but by complete co-incidence, the day after plexy's return of G.INP,  mine did the same.
There appeared no stimulation for this (ES were behaving quite normally - no sudden bursts for DLM to get interested in ) so it looks like, in my case, "that If the line is stable for 'x' period of time, then the DLM tends to apply G.INP." would appear to be the cause.
It took just over 9 weeks in my case.
Logged
Billion 8800NL
Pages: 1 [2]