Eleven months ago I attempted to gather statistics for the then available HG612 firmware images. [1] All was good for the ultra-short local loop (1.5 m) but the results for a longer loop were seriously degraded by a spool of copper coated steel cable. I made a note to source some new all-copper cable but never got around to doing so.
Last month I collected and shared the data relating to the latest firmware image from
Beattie, once it had been unlocked and given back its GUI by
Howlingwolf.
N*Star's comment (the previous post) was still in my mind when I saw an offer of two 100 m spools, 0.5 mm copper conductors, three pair, CW1308 specification cable on a well-known auction web-site. The price? £11-99
The two spools of cable were delivered on Thursday afternoon. The first test, with a magnet, was passed. Not copper coated steel. The second test, a good scrape of a conductor with a sharp blade, was passed. Not copper coated aluminium.
Batteries were fitted into the
Tester 301C, the green pair of one cable was shorted at the far end and the near-end was connected to the
LINE sockets of the
301C by 1.6 m test leads. The near-end of the blue pair was connected to the
REF sockets of the
301C by an identical set of 1.6 m test leads. With the
BAL control set off, a very satisfying trace for a short-circuit was seen. Look closely at the second image (attached below) and you can see that the indicated length is slightly more than 104 m. The next increment, to 105 m, positioned the cursor to the right of the deviation from horizontal by as much as it was to the left, when set at 104 m. So the measured length of that spool of cable is 104 m "plus a bit". Remembering to subtract the length of the test leads, 1.6 m (i.e. 1 m "plus a bit") from the measured length, gave me a result of 103 m.
Next the
Ohmmeter 18C was used to check the insulation resistance and conductor resistance of that spool of cable. Each pair (green, blue and orange) showed a very healthy insulation resistance greater than 1000 MOhms. Each pair showed an identical 18.4 Ohms value when shorted at the far end (over 206 m of conductor). Each individual conductor (of each pair) showed 9.5 Ohms (over 103 m of conductor). It was very satisfying to obtain consistent results for all the tests, for they showed the first spool of cable to be in excellent condition. I can therefore say that each of the six conductors has a resistance of 0.09 Ohm/metre.
Obviously I still need to check the second spool of cable, to determine its electrical length and condition. Once that has been done I should then be able to perform six separate experiments, with local loop lengths of 103 m, 206 m, 309 m, (309 + L) m, (309 + 2L) m and (309 + 3L) m, where L is the electrical length of the second spool of cable. I am assuming, of course, that fellow
kitizens will be interested to see the results?
[1]
http://forum.kitz.co.uk/index.php?topic=13160.0