Kitz ADSL Broadband Information
adsl spacer  
Support this site
Home Broadband ISPs Tech Routers Wiki Forum
 
     
   Compare ISP   Rate your ISP
   Glossary   Glossary
 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: DLM related question  (Read 11235 times)

sevenlayermuddle

  • Helpful
  • Addicted Kitizen
  • *
  • Posts: 5369
Re: DLM related question
« Reply #30 on: October 24, 2013, 02:01:12 PM »

Indeed,  I always thought the theoretical benefit of dying gasp was for example to stop prevent the DLM from taking emergency punitive action when a large number of 'lost sync' events  were seen in a short time, used to be ten in an hour, earned an immediate and semi-permanent 6dB on margin.   Was designed to quickly stabilise a duff line and make it usable.

The problem with above is, of course, if you're spending an afternoon experimenting with wiring changes its all too easy to hit the threshold... been there, got t-shirt, etc.    If however the router is able to send a dying gasp before the connection goes down then the DSLAM ought be be able to tell DLM not to count it as a 'fault'.   Unfortunately I seem to remember convincing myself that the DSLAM actually took no notice, so don't pin your hopes on it.

Above is based on 'old'   8 Mbps ADSL, I know the rest of the world has moved on but similar principles may persist.
Logged

ryant704

  • Reg Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 318
Re: DLM related question
« Reply #31 on: October 26, 2013, 12:19:20 AM »

"Once again the 15 minute data should show a number of parameters including
Actual INP, RTX_USED_ds, uptime, number of retrains, errored seconds ,
severely errored seconds and/or FEC seconds. The error counts should NOT
exceed 900 for any given 15 minute period."

From BT Sin 498
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]
 

anything