Kitz ADSL Broadband Information
adsl spacer  
Support this site
Site ADSL ISPs Tech Software Tutorials Routers Forum
 
     
   Compare ISP   Rate your ISP
 
July 31, 2010, 04:42:34 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: phyRe technology  (Read 583 times)
roseway
Administrator
Senior Kitizen
*
Posts: 24519


Penguins CAN fly


new new
« on: March 09, 2010, 06:59:34 PM »

Poking around in the configuration options in the new DGTeam firmware for DG834GT I see one called phyRe - Impulse Noise Protection. This is apparently a Broadcom-specific feature, which is supposed to improve the stability of a connection by removing impulse noise from the signal.

What isn't at all clear (to me) is whether this capability exists on all types of connection, or just ADSL2+, and whether it depends on specific DSLAM/MSAN types. Information on the net seems to be rather thin. Does anyone know more about this?
Logged

  Eric
pintosal
Reg Member
***
Posts: 115


new new
« Reply #1 on: March 09, 2010, 08:23:44 PM »

From what I've read, this will only work with Broadcom chip based DSLAMs, and where phyRe is switched on.
Logged
waltergmw
Helpful
Kitizen
*
Posts: 1151


new new
« Reply #2 on: March 09, 2010, 09:29:16 PM »

@ Pintosal,

The two wire modems always seem to show some sort of impulse noise protection in their diagnostics page, but usually it's just a constant figure - 2.46 TI, 1.64 Unknown, 2.0 TI.
However the new O2 one I showed yesterday with a Broadcom DSLAM gives a figure of 2.08, but there's seemingly no mention of phyRe.


Kind regards,
Walter
Logged
sevenlayermuddle
Helpful
Reg Member
*
Posts: 665


new new
« Reply #3 on: March 09, 2010, 10:17:26 PM »

That's interesting,  I dug around and found some stuff, this being one of the best I came up with:

http://www.broadcom.com/collateral/wp/XDSL-WP101-R.pdf

My initial impression is that it's basically a more efficient error-correction mechanism involving physical layer retransmissions, so providing a lower BER. 
If it's based on physical layer ReTX, it's safe to assume it would need a co-operating DSLAM.

It seems to targeted at IPTV which apparently requires a lower BER (ie fewer physical layer errors) compared to more conventional internet traffic, which can rely on TCP/IP protocols for recovery from physical layer error.   I know nothing about IPTV, but if it can't benefit from TCP's error recovery then I can well speculate that it wouldn't work over normal DSL or, at least, it would require a more generous SNRM and hence a degradation of data rate.

I'd need to understand the document a lot better before speculating whether PhyR provides any benefit for users of applications that use TCP/IP, who don't need IPTV.

And in order to consume the document properly I'll need daylight, strong coffee, and a degree of motivation and attention span that I find hard to sustain these days, so perhaps I never will Smiley

- 7LM
Logged
roseway
Administrator
Senior Kitizen
*
Posts: 24519


Penguins CAN fly


new new
« Reply #4 on: March 09, 2010, 10:35:34 PM »

That's an interesting document 7LM, so thanks. Like you I'll need daytime attention to take it in. Smiley
Logged

  Eric
HPsauce
Helpful
Kitizen
*
Posts: 1078


new new
« Reply #5 on: March 09, 2010, 10:43:56 PM »

An interesting "fast read". More study required.
In the short term a quick question to my contacts at Be I think...
(my Be line is set at INP=2 I believe and has a Broadcom DSLAM and a DG834GT at my end with DGTeam firmware)
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!